Archives About Staff BagNews is dedicated to visual politics, media literacy and the analysis of news images.
August 22, 2012

Todd Akin’s Right-Wing Science

If Congress had a committee on stupidity, we know who would be this week’s nominee to chair it.

The Huffington Post nailed it with this headline, and the triptych of images nicely captures how a blindly idiotic mentality can be hidden within the otherwise scripted demeanor of public performance.  (There are very few news photos of Akin that are not typical head shots of the Serious Public Official.)  Whether due to an offhand remark or the camera freezing a momentary blink of the eye, it’s only by accident, it seems, that we can see how a politician’s blue shirt, red tie, and white lies might be masking genuine stupidity.  After all, and I’m not making this up, Akin is a member of  the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

Except that no one should be surprised, and not only because of the many well-documented examples of conservatism’s renewed commitment to the subordination of women.  The larger truth of the matter is this: Akin’s understanding of biology is no worse than the Republican party’s understanding of economics, climatology,  or the other sciences that are essential resources for sound policy in the 21st century.  Furthermore, he has provided a remarkably clear example of how the Right finesses the difference between rhetoric and reality: they just make stuff up.

Paul Krugman at the New York Times has been doing a masterful job of exposing the lies on economic policy being pushed by those who obviously must know better.  (You can see the most recent example here.)  But Krugman remains America’s Cassandra, while Akin has been subject to instantaneous and comprehensive scorn.  So, what’s the difference between being flat wrong about conception during rape and austerity measures during a recession?  The difference is this: false claims about rape and pregnancy directly contradict the experience, education, and common sense of almost the entire adult population, whereas economics and other sciences are encountered only very indirectly.  Few adults haven’t had to think about pregnancy as a real consequence of their own actions, while only a very few can connect the dots between Congressional Budget Office projections and their personal well-being.

For better or worse, the public discussion about the presidential campaign is likely to swing back to matters of economic policy. When that happens, the GOP will once again be able to safely deny the obvious, contradict scientific knowledge, ignore decades of hard-earned experience, and promise sheer fantasy.  And like stupidity–and rape–it will be difficult or morally impossible for photojournalism to show the public what really is at stake.  In those all too familiar circumstances, it might help to remind people that Todd Akin sits on the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology–and the Committee on the Budget.

  • Grung_e_Gene

    Just like Dan Fielding on Night Court many years ago Akin has uncovered that he was Drugged by Soviet Agents!!! Now, he’s being targeted by the “Liberal Elite” they’re behind ever bush and tree ready to spring forth with their Gotcha Media Questions!

  • Gasho

    Your final point re: the inability to understand the significance of the budget discussion was handled really nicely today by an article from George Lakoff:

    While it isn’t accompanied by images in the normal sense, his using “Devil’s Budget” over and over starts to fix an image in the mind that makes the rest of the content stick. Check it out.

  • BamaGuy1024

    Brilliant commentary. The truly disturbing thing is that the average voter does not understand economics and so listens to the platitudes and empty promises and votes on just that. The GOP knows this. It is another reason we are so polarized

  • Elemenoise
Refresh Archives

Random Notes