BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement

May 13, 2012

Gitmo Trial PR Strategy: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed & Co. vs. the 9/11 Families

NewImage

NewImage

Khalid sheikh mohammed walid bin attash ramzi bin al shibh ali abudl aziz ali mustafa al hawsaw Gitmo

You know when you should really be worried about the offshore, kluged-together, military trial that finally got underway a week ago? (And no, it’s not when you hear about it first from BagNews.)

It’s when the government, pressing its thumb on the scale, feels compelled to pit the five defendants against the 9/11 families as a visual tactic to distract from the otherwise-Rube Goldberg process in place. Flying victims families to Gitmo to not just witness, but pose for group portraits in front of the prison. Creating courtroom drawings imagining the family members in direct confrontation with Sheikh Mohammed, Waleed bin Attash, Ramzi Binalshibh, Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali and Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi (who, incidentally, were not allowed to wear civilian clothing). Framing the families larger and higher as if they were judges or jurors, as opposed to spectators. Also, no court room drawings of defendants jumping out of their chairs to pray on the ground or being strapped to their chairs — just docile illustrations of justice going forward.

And that was just for the preliminary hearing.

(photos/illustrations 1: Reuters/caption: Seeking justice: Family members of the 9/11 victims pictured at U.S. Naval Base Guantanamo Bay, where they came to witness the arraignment of five prisoners accused of plotting the September 11 attacks. 2 & 3: AP

  • bks

     If the government had a case they would have prosecuted years ago.   The only evidence they have was extracted under torture, the records of which have been destroyed.   A total sham.

        –bks

    • jonst

       so tell me BKS…just curious what do advise we do today? Not what we should have done. Or not done. What, exactly, do we do today?  Hold them forever without a trial?  Bring them to federal court in DC and do exactly what we’re doing now, except on a bigger stage? Release them?  Give them a Walmart Suit and carfare home? 

      .

  • http://www.serr8d.blogspot.com/ Serr8d

    You’re right, Michael. We should just let ‘em go.

    And give them Government Assistance. And, US citizenship.

    Maybe they’ll vote Democratic!

    • DennisQ

      So you didn’t like my idea of shooting them in the back.  All right, let’s beat so-called “confessions” out of them, put them on trial using the phony confessions as evidence.  And then we shoot them in the back. 

  • DennisQ

    The nine family members sure look like a hanging “jury,” don’t they?  Betcha their disposition to find the defendants guilty was a factor in their selection as guests of the U.S. government.  In fact it’s likely that the defendants themselves were selected not for their actual guilt but for their willingness to proclaim their guilt.  Didn’t Mussaoui – who may have only heard about the plot – declare his guilt from the witness stand?It’s significant that American justice has deteriorated so much that kangaroo courts have supporters who say that at least they can be relied on for a guilty verdict . . . as if that were something to brag about!  The butcher’s thumb is on the scale but heck, a sale is a sale, right?  What a corrupt mess.The reason the trials are held in Guantanamo rather than in New York is that the defendants are guilty.  Imagine if the hanging jury of 9/11 families ends up with misgivings about the process.  Let’s say Hanging Juror #1 and Hanging Juror #8 both demur from the findings on procedural grounds? 

    • jonst

       utterly fascinating….now the FAMILY MEMBERS, become worthy of sly scornful comments. Whatever one can say about the ‘process’ (and one can say plenty) in the wake of 9/11 what do these family members have to really do with it? Are they not worthy of a bit more understanding and sympathy?  I guess not.  Your sympathy seems to be with the defendants. I repeat, fascinating.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=570058329 Catherine McCallum

      The family members were selected by lottery.
      As for the kangaroo court, the Obama administration preferred a civil trial in New York but were forced to abandon the plan after encountering political resistance. The military commissions were retooled to exclude evidence obtained by torture.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=570058329 Catherine McCallum

    The Reuters photo looks like any other tourist photo, only the monument in the background isn’t Mount Rushmore or the Eiffel Tower; it’s Gitmo, and people in the foreground don’t appear to be happy to be there.

    The first AP drawing looks like a reasonable facsimile of the way the courtroom might have been set up, with the family members in a gallery separated from the rest of the courtroom.

    The second drawing appears to be unfinished, and possibly not meant to be published. It is clearly fantastical, with the defendants floating out of place at the back of the courtroom. I don’t know what to make of it, except that I don’t like it.

  • bks

    The Fed clearly don’t have a case, so the prisoners must be released.   And then we can declare an end to the Phony War On Terror.   Also, John Walker LIndh should be pardoned immediately.

         –bks

  • DennisQ

    Yes, we release them.  That’s exactly what we do with people who’ve been put on trial and not found guilty.  Of course, the fix is in.  If the government had a strong case, the trial would have been held in New York where the crime occurred.  Afraid to give these outlaws a fair trial, Marshal?  Shoot ‘em in the back!

  • jonst

     I asked for an answer…..I got one. I thank you for that.  Release them you say?  Sure…that’s realistic.

  • http://www.serr8d.blogspot.com/ Serr8d

    In the back? NO! in the HEADs!

    Just like the Chinese do. You know, the Red Chinese; the ones already running the newly-remodeled Democratic Party’s dream ideology, especially the one-Party-RULES! and the Government-controls-EVAHTHING! planks you so wantonly desire!

  • jonst

     The strength of the case, I would suggest, had nothing to do with not having it in NYC. It was more the LACK of strength in the Americans making the decision to not have the trial in NYC. But all that is beside the point….in the real world, except in certain spots only flirting with reality.  The Party that releases them can forget about the White House for a 100 years.  Please, don’t get me wrong…I support neither of these parties. They both are criminals, in my eyes. But that is all beside the point.  Release them?  Go ahead….the release of these guys is just what the world needs. We need it like we need more drones being fired. 

  • DennisQ

    I hope for the sake of history that the American government releases just what it has on these suspects because as of this juncture it doesn’t look likey they’ve got a whole lot.  We’re handing these guys a moral victory which they certainly don’t deserve – if, in fact, they did it. 

  • DennisQ

    The judgment of history kept Nixon from using atomic bombs in Vietnam.  He wanted to nuke ‘em, but Kissinger talked him out of it.  Historical players don’t live just in their own times but in the future as well.  Nixon’s reputation – such as it is – owes whatever good grace it retains to Kissinger’s shrewd counsel.  We certainly can get away for the time being with rounding up the usual suspects and ignoring the standards of justice that protect the rights of a common criminal.  But we’re about to hand the Muslim world a moral victory in addition to the real possibiility that whoever really did the 9-11 attacks got away with it.  It was not just a spectacular crime, but one that was so well-executed that we might was well accuse Bruno Hauptmann of being the mastermind.  Sloppy justice – who cares?  This thing has been open for 10 years, and we need closure.  Nixon’s Peace With Honor was averted at the last minute.