BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Thursday, May 23, 2013

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement

November 3, 2011

In “Upper Rung America,” Things Break but People Aren’t Left to Hang

The more I look at this illustration, the more curious it seems to get:

1. Maybe because you hardly ever look at a ladder this close, especially when the sides rails aren’t completely visible, I also can see this as two separate windows. The difference between the two is that, in “upper America,” things break but people aren’t left to hang.

2. If a rung shattered and you were hanging onto it, seems you would almost immediately loosen your grip. I can just as much see this hand, formed in the iconic symbol of protest, grabbing up a splintered piece of wood. At some level, is this cover a predictor of violence?

3. As an analogy for America and our economic food chain, how could two non-consecutive rungs possibly shatter at the same time? Talk about the country’s profound disconnect when it comes to shared problems and shared solutions.

  • Thomas

    A: If you run a pump and dump on rungs you know will fail and your dorm buddies at the Fed cover you bonuses, then … yes!

    Your remark on shared problems and shared solutions is totally on target. The question the cover is asking is rooted in the bogus Milton Friedman daydream that the core of human behavior is selfishness. As though my own upward mobility is the extent of my concern over the system’s legitimacy. Totally bogus question. It’s hard not to suspect that the messengers of corporate consumer culture don’t have such a fetishistic fixation on individualism because it discourages people from correlating their struggles, asking rude questions, organizing protests.

  • Anonymous

    3. As an analogy for America and our economic food chain, how could two non-consecutive rungs possibly shatter at the same time? 

    I see a ladder damaged by the weight of the previous users, those now on top. I gather those on top are not troubled by the damage they did as they climbed, feel no responsibility to those that might want to follow. In fact, I suspect they’d like that guy holding on to turn loose and go away so they can pull the ladder up after them.

  • Anonymous

    3. As an analogy for America and our economic food chain, how could two non-consecutive rungs possibly shatter at the same time? 

    I see a ladder damaged by the weight of the previous users, those now on top. I gather those on top are not troubled by the damage they did as they climbed, feel no responsibility to those that might want to follow. In fact, I suspect they’d like that guy holding on to turn loose and go away so they can pull the ladder up after them.

  • omen

    yes, it’s the raised fist of labor solidarity.

    the image implies the rungs broke under the weight of the underclass trying to hang on. when the reality is those rungs were intentionally sawed off with a chainsaw by the ruling elites who are uninterested in democracy and are opposed to the values that call for the sharing of wealth or power.

  • bks

    Like the repeal of the Bank of America $5/month debit card fee, this is a small yet significant sign that OWS has changed the parameters of political discussion.

        –bks

  • bks

    Like the repeal of the Bank of America $5/month debit card fee, this is a small yet significant sign that OWS has changed the parameters of political discussion.

        –bks

  • Ralph

     A ladder is a poor  symbol of life in America.  OWS has substituted  a lifeboat analogy, because we’re all in the same boat.  The corporatists  don’t want to see that because changing their focus from profit to protecting life is Hard Work. for Time-Warner etc. 

  • Enoch Root

    I don’t see an Italian leather shoe kicking out the top rungs, so therefore this analogy is incomplete.

  • Enoch Root

    I don’t see an Italian leather shoe kicking out the top rungs, so therefore this analogy is incomplete.

  • futurebird

    I find the choice of a white probably male hand unsurprising, but also incorrect, the people hurt most by this economy are not white and not men. (and not able bodied frequently) 

    And all the rungs should be broken.

    Also, the way the rungs are broken suggest some kind of downward force… how did they get broken? someone else scrabbling to the top? Sabotage?