BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Thursday, February 23, 2012

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement



October 1, 2011

al-Awlaki: What’s Wrong with this Picture?

Al Awlaki 2001

I am especially interested in this photo — and the opportunity for us to study it and think about it — since the Administration “predator-droned” Anwar al-Alwaki into the ground last Friday. (Yes, going forward, I recognize “predator drone” as a verb.)

First, let’s consider the caption from TIME’s “Anwar al-Awlaki in the United States” slideshow (keeping in mind — regardless of any ambiguity in that title — that al-Awlaki was born and raised an American). The caption reads:

Dar al Hijrah Mosque, Falls Church, Virginia
Patricia Morris, left, and Imam Anwar al-Awlaki stand inside Dar al Hijrah Mosque in Falls Church, Virginia in 2001. In Virginia, al-Awlaki served as imam of the mosque from 2001-2002, while pursuing a doctorate at George Washington University and serving as the school’s Muslim chaplain. Morris organized a vigil of solidarity at the mosque, in the weeks following the September 11 attacks.

In considering the photo, a critical thing to think about is exactly when it was taken. Unfortunately (but maybe not surprisingly, al-Awlaki now reduced to one more X-ed out evil-doer), the TIME caption leaves this ambiguous, as we have no idea if the photo was taken before or after 9/11/2001. The caption says Morris organized a vigil after the attacks, but by referring only to her (he had no involvement in it?), there is a subtle intimation that the photo was taken earlier in the year — leaving us to imagine what kind of face al-Awlaki might have presented to the WAPO photographer, Tracy. A Woodward, after the terror attack. …In point-of-fact, though, if we check GettyImages, we find out that the photograph was made on October 4th, 2001, three weeks after the attacks.

That being the case, how are we to account for the warmth and the normalcy here amidst the children, the soft and direct expression of the man in the khakis, open shirt and sports jacket, the relaxed shoulders, the only-loosely crossed arms and the sense of affinity and collegiality between the Iman and the WASP woman? Would you say that Al-Awlaki’s expression — the photo captured in that one-month period of national soul-searching prior to attacking Afghanistan, filled with compassion and gestures of goodwill and a desire for dialogue with America’s Muslim community — reflects the mood in the U.S. before America, too, became alienated by the Bush Administration’s radicalism and America experienced a progressively raw, building up of generalized hate toward the Muslim world incubating in that seventeen month stretch of time preceding the actual launch of the misguided war on Iraq?

Al-Awlaki’s story is full of contradictions. He father was a Fulbright scholar, an American academic but then, also, a member of the Yemeni government. Al-Awlaki lived in the U.S. till he was seven, returned to Yemen, then came back to the U.S. to go to college. In that stretch, he spent one summer against the Russians with the Afghan mujahideen in the pre-Taliban days.

Preaching in a mosque in San Diego after receiving an M.A. in education, it is alleged that Al-Awlaki had contact with several of the 9/11 hijackers. But then, showing no signs of radicalism, he actually moved East to make a life for himself in the DC area in January 2001, becoming the Imam at the Virginia mosque shown in the photo and also becoming the Muslim chaplain at George Washington University. After the 9/11 attacks, he even had meetings with Pentagon officials to discuss cross-cultural relations, and in 2002, he was the first imam to carry out a prayer service at the U.S. Capitol. It wasn’t till the end of 2002 that Al-Awlaki left the U.S., citing an increasing hostile climate for Muslims in the U.S. This was amidst a prosecution for passport fraud — because in 1990, he stated he was from Yemen to qualify for college scholarship money. To emphasize, much has been written about Al-Awlaki and his possible roots to terrorism, but the story is ambiguous. FBI officials claim al-Awlaki had prior knowledge of 9/11, yet it wasn’t until he arrived in Britain that his actions become demonstrably radicalized.

Which leads us back to the photo — and that ambiguity.

Now ten years beyond 9/11 and three years into Obama’s term, what does it mean, really, the idea of “looking back” and understanding? There was no inclination to look back and examine the Bush Administration’s prosecution of the so-called “terror war” and the law-breaking actions to justify the war on Iraq. At the same time, America has failed to bring the terror suspects held at Gitmo into and under the sphere of the criminal justice system. Today, the same goes for how we deal with our persistent, if aging Muslim antagonists. If anything is shocking about what happened Friday, it’s how much America’s relationship with those that hate us (against a backdrop of a Middle East, and a Muslim core, most notable now for wrestling with political freedoms) falls into the knee-jerk bucket of cowboy justice, pulverization, and targeted killings — this one, historic for the first ever of an American.

So, I’m interested in who the man is in this picture, what happened to the man in this picture, and, above all, what exactly is going on in this picture — as we all, naturally, should be. Those questions, and the ultimate answers to those questions, I would go so far as suggest, are not only vital to our American democracy but to also recovering our sense of humanity — even if this government, caught up in its warrior technology and bloodlust, could hardly give a damn.

(photo: Tracy A. Woodward/The Washington Post/Getty Images original Getty caption: Patricia Morris and Imam Anwar Al Awlaki, photographed inside Dar al Hijrah Mosque in Falls Church, VA. In background are students at the Islamic School. For a story on non-Muslims reaching out to Muslims.)

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=699726629 Dave McLane

    If I were Patricia Morris I would have already been heading for parts unknown.

  • Xxxmuff25xxx

    Wow! Do all liberal, progressives actually swallow all the garbage you guys spew out?  You leftwingers are a bunch of idiots!  I guess you assume that if you continue as a group to repeat the same socialistic B.S., everyone will eventually see it as fact instead of  the hilarious, mindless dribble that mainstream America sees it as.

  • glenn

    This response makes me curious. As Michael writes, this comment is a textbook example of “the knee-jerk bucket of cowboy justice.”

    The story itself is pretty mild – it’s essentially “here’s an old picture of a guy now known to be a terrorist (deceased) looking benign. What happened to the guy to change him? or was he concealing his ‘true nature’?”

    The story invites people to speculate and wonder. Even if one is a conservative, it would be a curious intellectual exercise.

    And xxxmuff25xxx denounces “garbage” being “spewed” (I’m in favor of a moratorium on the word ’spewed’ in online discourse, BTW} -  and “socialistic BS” – what is he talking about exactly?

    Don’t you want to ponder what makes a seemingly normal person turn into a terrorist? Isn’t it worth discussing? What’s the alternative to discussion and curiosity – NOT wondering, and writing off millions of people on the assumption that they are inherently and unchangeably evil? But even in that case, wouldn’t you wonder how they got that way?

    And as for the issue of targeted killings – don’t even conservative war-hawks question the concept of this? How odd, when coupled with some of the conservative paranoia about government, that they still seem to cheerlead for targeted assassination of terrorists” – or any other human beings – without question?

    Also amusing is the knee-jerk use of ’socialism’ – what’s economic policy got to do with it? I guess ’socialist’ has become the all-purpose invective.

  • http://reciprocity-failure.blogspot.com Stan B.

    We at least know that he was an American that was executed without trial. And since he looked more like them than he does “us,” no one here is gonna lose any sleep over it- even if understanding that conversion (as you rightly imply) could possibly help save some (of our) lives.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=699726629 Dave McLane

    @846a1a89f32a2abe57a9be8ed0df122e:disqus What I lose sleep over is that it seems that the President can now order anybody, anywhere, US Citizen or not, without trial.

  • http://ralfast.wordpress.com/ Ralfast

    Yes, minor dribble like law, the Constitution, and other trivial matters. Remind me of that again the next time you claim to be fighting for freedom.

  • https://quaxquax.myopenid.com/ quaxquax

    Makes me want to ponder what makes a seemingly normal person turn into a conservo-bot who’s spewing unrelated rhetoric.

    Well, actually this may be just a generic conservative spam bot.  It is written vaguely  enough to be just blasted automatically to a bunch of progressive blogs (captchas don’t work very reliably anymore – image processing tools became too good).

  • Anonymous

    To Dave McLane, one of my first thoughts after finishing Michael’s observations focused on Morris. The risk she might be facing hadn’t occurred to me, though your point is definitely well taken. I was thinking about how we see these persons standing together at a single moment 10 years ago. We know a fair amount about what happened to one of them in the interim (undoubtedly less than we think we know). But what about the other? What’s happened to Morris? Assuming the best, I wonder how she feels about the assassination of Alwaki?

    And, yes, this assassination of an American citizen without trial or even warrant is sad and irrevocable.

  • bks

    Executing an American without due process?  What trivia!  Could be get back to discussions about whether Christie’s weight disqualifies him for the presidency and other important issues that preoccupy the punditocracy.

        –bks

  • omen

    imagine if obama had assassinated an israeli. or an american jew. protests would be much vocal, wouldn’t it. if this sort of action is only reserved for “the other,” then it’s nothing but bigotry.

    another blogger had this to say:

    “Assassinations are ALWAYS political, NEVER about justice.”

  • http://ralfast.wordpress.com/ Ralfast

    I warned my conservative friends that the problem with the so called War on Terror (besides the wars of aggression, war crimes and crimes against humanity) was how much power was invested on the Office of the President, not on any one President, but on the office itself. Once given that power few, very few, loathed to give it up, especially if they have a ready made excuse to use it.

  • omen

    just dawned on me how our actions only served to affirm al awaki’s arguments.

    we didn’t get rid of a propagandist, we elevated him to be venerated for generations to come. that doesn’t count as a “victory.”

  • Anonymous

    Shorter Government:
    “we can spy on, imprison, or even kill anyone we want — including
    citizens — without any due process or any evidence shown, simply because
    we will tell you they are Bad People, and you will trust us and believe
    us.”

  • edddd

    Israel killed an American in International waters on that unarmed boat trying to get some aid to Gaza and the US Admin yawned.

  • LanceThruster

    What’s sad is that if we can get John Yoo to sign off on the legality of torture, then I don’t expect much questioning of the constitutionality of extra-judicial killings. Hardcore “patriots” may poo-poo such niceties as the Constitution, but my fear as a citizen increases exponentially when it’s treated as “just a goddamned piece of paper.”

  • Linda

    To Xxxmuff25xxx, if you’re not a “bot-post” then frankly, no, ALL liberals and progressives don’t swallow all the garbage etc…etc… Some liberals and progressives actually think for themselves and take the time to do it. I know it’s harder than just getting spoon-fed what to believe but well, being informed is an active approach to life that takes time, thought and energy. Ya might want to try it for yourself.

    As to the picture, it is amazing to look at this man and woman standing together 3 weeks after the communal spirit of 9/11 lived and just before the FEAR machine killed it. Literally. It is very relaxed. it seems to be impartial even.

    None of us will ever know if Awaki was innocent or guilty because he never had a trial, therein lies Obama’ real problem, this whole country’s REAL problem. Any of us could be wearing targets on our backs. We are NOT a nation of laws as Obama stated so vehemently when answering a question about Bradley Manning. (off topic: but what happened to that story or is he just another dead American?)

    Cut to our Nobel Peace Prize winning President killing this man, an American citizen, without due process, oh, I know he looks like one of them damn foreigners so why care, but we should all care deeply. Very very deeply. It is not only that the POTUS is a constitutional lawyer. It is the precedent he just set. He just crushed any semblance of that venerable constitution under the fire power of a sick and depraved “killing from a distance” by drone strike.

    (Picture, oh say, Timothy McVeigh being shown dead in his living room, after a presidential order to drone strike his home was carried out successfully and the news covering it like it was a weather story) Is that our future? Because if it is then…

    From a totalitarian regime stand point, Mr. Shaw…
    It’s picture perfect.

  • LanceThruster

    It’s clear we no longer even need to invoke their names any more and just use the generic, “Emmanuel Goldstein.”

    NEWSFLASH – - – Emmanuel Goldstein was again killed by predator drone today…”

  • Marte

    Michael, I have only “this instant” finished reading both your post here at Salon and a couple of posts at a different site where you post.  I clicked on your name hoping to find the most direct way to reach you personally but Salon reported it couldn’t call up the url.  Tried the Facebook connection but I’m not on Facebook (yet, any way … if ever).  If you find this comment could you re-post a link where you can be reached? I would much appreciate the opportunity for some dialog with you at greater length than I feel is appropriate in the midst of this (appropriately and welcomely) long series of comments to Glen’s original article. 

  • http://www.bagnewsnotes.com Michael Shaw

    mshaw at bagnews dot com

  • Anonymous

    There were also nice pictures of Hitler smiling and acting civilized, but I don’t the United States should have hesitated for a second to hunt his ass down and place a bullet in his brain (yes, I know it didn’t actually happen that way). 

    If al–Alwaki wanted a trial, he should he turned himself over to Yemeni authorities. 

  • Sweeetpig

    Nothing wrong with the photo. Time magazine, looking for a photo of al-Awlaki, found the photo on the Getty Images website (where the Washington Post syndicates their material) The new caption, on the other hand, is poorly written by most likely an underpaid web editor at Time.com who wasn’t expecting such a deep analysis here.

  • Marc

    agreed. good analysis