BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Saturday, May 25, 2013

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement

September 16, 2011

Who Else Wanted to Do Away with the World Trade Center. (Updated to Include the Arabs – But it’s not what You Think.)

There’s a lot to tease out of this Corbis file photo leading off a Spiegel “History of the Trade Center” slideshow.

Here’s the caption:

A 1962 protest against plans to construct the World Trade Center in Manhattan. A cardboard sign on an open casket reads: “Here lies Mr. Small Businessman – don’t let the Port Authority bury him.” In the end, the protests of these “Radio Row” businessmen helped little. Soon thereafter the wrecking ball arrived, and a total of 325 businesses were leveled to make room for what at the time was the biggest construction project in the history of the United States.

Besides the casket and all the death allusions, which are macabre to consider given all the corporate and Wall Street workers that perished on the spot long after the radio shops were buried, consider the argument being made. Small business owners are appealing to Congress to save them from a city colluding with huge corporate interests, evoking not just the Constitution but actually likening their battle to America’s tea parties. Thank goodness, given a proper appreciation for the free market, and the Constitutional enlightenment of conservative Republicans, we’ve got it all straightened out now.

UPDATE: First, thanks to Glen for his comment below. I somehow didn’t know (and am saddened, but not surprised to realize I never tripped upon this during last year’s “Ground Zero mosque” brouhaha) that the Trade Center was directly adjacent to what was known, for about fifty years, as New York’s Syrian Quarter. (Here’s the Wikipedia entry; a post of wonderful pictures drawn from over 1,000-related images owned by the Library of Congress; a write-up with video at LA public radio’s KPCC; and a NYT piece from the NY section published last year a few weeks before 9/11 while the protests were fomenting.)  Considering that the (mostly Christian) Arabs were forced off the land by the city in the mid-40’s to accomodate the Brooklyn-Battery Tunney, the photo above echoes a previous community (and constituency?) buried and dispossessed.  With this history in mind, perhaps a more telling sequence of photos might look like this:

(photo 2: Chris Hondros/Getty Images. caption: Opponents of an Islamic cultural center and mosque planned to be built near Ground Zero in lower Manhattan gather during a demonstration on August 22, 2010 in New York, New York. photo 3: Bain News Service. Pastry counter — Syrian restaurant. undated. Aproximately 1900? )

  • Anonymous

    They pose for the still camera, their argument neatly laid out in commercial copy with the graphic appeal of Wednesday supplemental newspaper ads. Their visual prop, a cheap coffin, lies quietly off to the side. The tiny gaggle of Mr Small Business, (a subset of Mr Shirtsleeve Whiteguy), holds its thin white line as Stereophonic High Fidelity and Television in three foot tall letters arch over them like a tsunami wave rolling up on a fishing village.

    • http://www.serr8d.blogspot.com/ Serr8d

      Nice racialisms you’re mocking there.

      A full-on follower of the late Dr. King, I presume ?

  • glenn

    Actually, one fascinating historical footnote is the fact that the neighborhood where the WTC was built used to be an enclave of immigrants from Syria and Lebanon. It was known as Little Syria from the late 19th century till the mid ’40s or so. Although most of residents were Christian, a good amount of them were Muslims from Palestine. There were Arab merchants, groceries, bakeries, places of worship both Christian and Muslim. So in fact, the so-called Ground Zero Mosque is not the first mosque to serve the community in this neighborhood.

    The neighborhood was razed in the late ’40s during construction of the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel.

    • http://www.bagnewsnotes.com Michael Shaw

      Fascinating, indeed. Almost as interesting is the fact I never heard a mention of this during the “Ground Zero mosque” histrionics.

  • glenn

    Hey, cool you found all that material after my comment!

  • http://ralfast.wordpress.com/ Ralfast

    And you are not making much sense, are you.

  • http://www.serr8d.blogspot.com/ Serr8d

    Come on, your brain needs the exercise.

    Mr. BlackDogBarking twice referred to the ‘color’ white in his comment; anyone can see he’s full of hatred and resentments towards those not of ‘his’ ‘color’. Not hard to discern, really.

    Dr. King expressly disavowed acknowledging color as a determinant of a person’s character. I’d guess he would look askance at Mr. BlackDogBarking’s comment as unhelpful. But, given the times, and the inclinations of Democrats to race-bait at every opportunity, such a comment goes unnoticed in this sort of echo chamber.

    I mocked Mr. BlackDogBarking; you, who couldn’t see that, obviously are not attuned to simple counterpoint nuances.

  • Anonymous

    Good grief. Look at the picture. A dozen 1962 white guys in their white guy uniforms (white shirts tucked neatly into uniformly dark slacks, dark shoes ) are protesting a city ordinance by getting their picture took. In 1962 Dr King is in Albany GA protesting civil slavery by filling the local jail with the civilly disobedient. Going to jail as a protest.

    I’m actually sympathetic with the white guys’ plight. They’re right. They’re being forced to accept some discomfort in the name of the common good. They’re also asserting a goodly amount of white and male privilege and I’ll bet there’s not the tiniest trace of a clue in the entire group that the “Mr” in Mr Small Businessman automatically excludes half the human race. Interestingly the photo also shows the coming wave of TV and music — we the viewers can see the signs and our protesters cannot — neat little dramatic irony. From our vantage in history we the viewer know they could walk a few blocks up the street and catch a set from a young Bob Dylan, this being 1962 and New York. Bet they don’t.

    For the record, you *know* nothing of my gender or race. I’ll help you out. When asked Race? on a form I always write ‘Human’.

    Look at the picture.

  • http://ralfast.wordpress.com/ Ralfast

    Race-bait? Or pointing the obvious? and Dr. King disavowed color as the ONLY determinant of a person’s character unless you are one of those who blithely exclaim that they “don’t see color but the person” as if it somehow it is a choice of makeup. Then again, the signs these folks are holding are far more accurate than their TP counterpart today. Strange isn’t it?

  • Anonymous

    It amuses me that every time someone mentions a skin color in their post, you dub them race-baiting Democrats. Apparently you are addicted to playing the race card whenever you think you’re talking to a Democrat, which is…erm…race-baiting.

    Is there such a thing as a self-awareness clinic? Because you’re in deep need of one.