BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Friday, May 25, 2012

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement



August 18, 2011

Obama: Campaign Bus As Metaphor

If people can’t stop talking about the Obama campaign bus, the question is why?

As I wrote the other day, Obama finds his center-of-gravity primarily by orienting himself to forces outside himself and in opposition to each other. Otherwise, he’s primarily a blank slate. I don’t think the real issue with the bus is its cost, or the fact it’s made in Canada, or that it’s reminiscent of Darth Vadar (though, if you don’t put your own mark or signature on something, people will gladly do that for you. That’s why the health care legislation, never named, is most often referred to as “ObamaCare.”)

I think people are freaked out by the bus because it’s a prominent and quite overt metaphor for a President who occupies the negative space; who can’t be pinned down; whose ideology is “split the difference”; who is chameleon-like; who is primarily and safely defined on the White House Flickr site in the most generic, most establishment of ways — as wrapped in the flag and the troops; as a golf fanatic; as incessantly reaching out to the GOP; as someone absolutely magnetized by American popular culture (movie stars, sports heros, the boys scouts, former presidents, fast food). Otherwise, like the bus, Obama can’t and won’t be identified.

I believe this nature — the resistance to being pinned down or planted — is also “reflected” in the many photos of Obama on the Flickr site which present him as mirrored — as not one person in one place so much as a two-way image balanced elegantly from opposite sides.

Here, in a White House Flickr shot that predates Tiger Woods’ meltdown, we see the still-new President drawing off Tiger’s glow as a mega-rockstar sports figure in a shot that mirrors the other’s body language. (Not surprisingly, by the way, this photo seems to have been removed from the WH Flickr site.)

And what about this? It’s the shot posted on the Flickr site April 8, 2011, to mark the end-game in budget negotiations, in which Obama was ultimately faulted for capitulating to the Republican’s threat to shut down the government in the last budget compromise before this most recent budget compromise. The inference from the White House, I assume, was that Obama, like a conciliatory sage, was seeing it from both sides.

Finally, the shot I love is the picture of Obama on Inauguration morning standing before a mirror.

Initially I thought, as I believe most people did, that the gaze represented a sober recognition of the responsibility ahead. Little did I appreciate that Obama might also have been looking for himself — a man never here nor there, exactly, but always somewhere in between.

(photo 1: Sun Times.photos 2 – 6: Pete Souza/White House caption 2: Reflected in a mirror, President Barack Obama poses with customers at the Famous 4th Street Deli in Philadelphia, Pa., Oct. 30, 2010. caption 3: U.S. President Barack Obama greets professional golfer Tiger Woods (R) in the Oval Office April 20, 2009.caption 4: President Barack Obama is reflected in a mirror as he speaks at a fundraiser in Los Angeles, May 27, 2009. caption 5: President Barack Obama is reflected in a mirror in the Outer Oval Office as talks with Chief of Staff Bill Daley, left, and Vice President Joe Biden in the doorway of the Oval Office, April 8, 2011. caption 6: Jan. 20, 2009 “President-elect Barack Obama was about to walk out to take the oath of office. Backstage at the U.S. Capitol, he took one last look at his appearance in the mirror.”)

  • Roberta

    Sorry,I don’t see him that way. Is you analysis a little bias? What he has to put up with everyday is just a bunch of crap.

    • jonst

      Really Roberta, your breaking my heart, “he” to put up with so much “crap”. It’s really breakin my heart.  All the way to the huge speaking fees. He is an elitist phony. Another one. There is not one, NOT one, politician, with the exception of the Bernie Sanders that I would give a dime for. And there is not one of them that would listen to the speaker if all he or she had was dime.  This group around now….GOP, DEMs, Teabaggers, whatever, in it for the money and the power.

  • Dwhite2762

    That’s not what I see in the bus picture.  I see Obama standing in the window of the bus, anxious, impatient to get out, the shirt sleeves already rolled up.  I have experience riding on a bus and I have experienced the same impatience of wanting to jump out of a bus soon as it stops. 

  • glenn

    In this piece of analysis, I think the link between the “mirror” and the bus is forced.

  • Boxcar

    People are NOT talking about the bus. The media and politicians who need to continually stay on the offensive are. It’s dumb and an obvious attempt at diverting what Obama may be saying by going “never mind that! Have you seen his bus!”

    Means nothing.

  • CathyMac

    I’m with Roberta. This analysis feels biased. Obama has done what he said he would do – he has sought compromise and a middle ground. He was never the socialist-lefty the media and the right wing have tried to paint him, nor was he the peacenik corporation-busting warrior the left wing wanted him to be. He’s a centrist. As much as I’d love to see him put a boot up the behind of the intransigent idiocracy on the right, I at least know that he is what he said he was; and that being not a dictator but a president, his options are and will always be limited.

    • CathyMac

      Oh, and for the record, the health care legislation is called the Affordable Care Act. The corporate-influenced media was only too happy to pick up the GOP’s Obamacare moniker, although when the law comes fully into effect and lives are impacted positively by it, I expect they’ll pull the ‘Obama’ tag and revert to the less catchy original name.

    • Roberta

      Thank you CathyMac, After I wrote that, I just was so disgusted I couldn’t go back on and correct all the misconceptions. There is absolutely nothing our President can do that the Republicans won’t stry and stoop, and there are some Dems who are starting to eating their own. It’s heartbreaking to see what is going on in the congress and the media. The 2010 elections had consequences and this shit that is going on is the outcome. I thought his bus tour was great, I watched all of his speeches and the reactions from the people outside the bubble of DC. They get it. DC doesn’t.

  • Guest1

    The Secret Service ordered this bus and the Republican candidate will be campaigning from one just like it.  It’s obviously not one that his campaign got especially for him.

  • Stella

    Dominating the landscape, the bus is a big dark symbol of our police state. 

    I’m glad to see the president’s safety being taken seriously, because things can get a whole lot uglier than this eyesore.

  • Stella

    Dominating the landscape, the bus is a big dark symbol of our police state. 

    I’m glad to see the president’s safety being taken seriously, because things can get a whole lot uglier than this eyesore.

  • psychohistorian

    Why isn’t he sitting down and have his seat belt on?

  • arcadesproject

    Bus is scary.    Looks like something to do with a prison.  Or war.  The creatures inside the bus are anonymous and probably cruel.  That bus will role right on over you.  Or take you away and you will never be seen or heard from again. 

    • http://profiles.google.com/glennisw250 Glennis Waterman

      It is a curious question of protocol. If the buses belong to the government, but will be used for both parties’ presidential candidates, will they be “wrapped”?

      Should a sitting president’s tour bus be branded and logo’d at all? Should it be logo’d discretely or marked accordingly to some kind of presidential protocol? What color should presidential transportation vehicles be, and is there a security reason for certain colors?

      Should the two parties’ candidates be driven around in identically colored buses, or is each candidate, once the campaign starts, free to wrap and brand his/her own bus more conspicuously as long as it’s being paid for by separate campaign funds?

  • T Perky

    Politicians in it for the money? Really? OMG! When did this happen? How long has it been going on? Someone’s gotta tell the American people!

    Seriously, what rock have you been hiding under if you think this is the first group of politicians in it for the money and power? I agree with Roberta – I’m not seeing what Michael is seeing. The only ones “freaking out” about the bus are the wingnuts, who do this every time Obama does something so normal that they’ve done it in the past. They’ve already moved on to “how can he go on vacation now??” Same old, same old…

  • T Perky

    Politicians in it for the money? Really? OMG! When did this happen? How long has it been going on? Someone’s gotta tell the American people!

    Seriously, what rock have you been hiding under if you think this is the first group of politicians in it for the money and power? I agree with Roberta – I’m not seeing what Michael is seeing. The only ones “freaking out” about the bus are the wingnuts, who do this every time Obama does something so normal that they’ve done it in the past. They’ve already moved on to “how can he go on vacation now??” Same old, same old…

  • jonst

    Did I imply that the present group of politicians is the first group to be in it for the money?  Look, T Perk, one either thinks this thing, the corruption, and the payoff, and golden parachutes,  is at a scale, and across a scope that is unprecedented since the Robber Barons.  Or one does not. And if you do not…if you see what is going on now as simply the same ole, same ole, that perhaps you are the one that is under the rocks.  The fact of the matter is…since FDR’s time, and the changes brought on by the dramatic reforms of the New Deal, the power of the lower and middle classes had been growing.  This progress, if you are among the people who deemed it progress, has now been halted, and is in the process of being reversed . And this reversal, I would argue, has come, partially, as a result of benefits moving from the middle class and lower class (those terms are employed in an economic sense) on to the upper class, via the subsidization of financial sector. This is being done through the privatization of govt services and selling of assests to the holders of capital who tack on their rent collecting games.. This movement is primarly facilitated by the GOP and by the Neoliberalism in in the Dem party. First and foremost among this group is Obama et al. 

    The battle, at bottom, is simply to repeal the benefits and protections of the New Deal and replace them with a bad deal.  Obama, et al, would, admittedly, like that deal to be a little less bad than the GOP would.  If I am supposed to throw up my hands, get down on my knees and thank the One as he gives us a little bit less worse deal than the next guy….simply because he is Obama and he talks a good game, he and you can forget it.  I say to hell with him and with all of the Neoliberals.

  • T Perky

    “Did I imply that the present group of politicians is the first group to be in it for the money?”

    You’re right, you didn’t imply it.

    “This group around now….GOP, DEMs, Teabaggers, whatever, in it for the money and the power.”

    You said it outright.

    “if you see what is going on now as simply the same ole, same ole,”

    I said the whining about vacations and buses is same old, same old. It was in the paragraph with the statement about politicians and power, but I believe it was clear what I was referencing.

    Look, I get it, times are bad, everyone’s disappointed and hurting. I am, too. And there’s enough blame to go around. But flailing at everyone doesn’t do anything; instead of building consensus, it destroys it. And really, “the One?” The only people who have called Obama that were people like you who irrationally hate him for not being what you want him to be. Also, I’d certainly like to know where Obama or I demanded you “get down on your knees” to him. If you have to be dishonest about your hate object, perhaps your arguments aren’t very convincing.

  • jonst

    Build “consensus” around what? I could point to ten policy positions where I think there is a “consensus” in DC.  And I hope said “consensus” is destroyed.  As to blame….whom the cap fits let him wear it.  I don’t irrationally “hate” Obama.  I hate him, or more precisely, his agenda, rationally, from my perspective. I’m not afraid to “hate” what I perceive to be injustice and oppression.  As to my arguments….like anyone’s, including yours, they will stand or fall over time.  And as to “failing”….it is in the eye of beholder.  

    If more people jump on your ‘bus-ride to a false and self defeating “consensus’ you will see the following:  the wealthy gain a bigger share of the wealth than they have now. You will see more power settling in the Executive. You will see more “humanitarian wars”.  You will see more so called free trade agreements. You will see more, dramatically, more,  corporate control over IP.  You will see more unemployment. Even less anti-trust actions than you see now.  More off shore oil drilling. And more cuts for Medicare/caid and Social Security. A further reduction in the protections in the 4th amendment This is the direction the bus is taking us in. ANd the best pitch the Neoliberals have is ‘we’re not taking faster than the batshit crazy GOP would. You should be satisfied and happy with that1′  And you want me to join THAT consensus?  I’ll pass.  Na….hating this bunch, is a good thing.  Actively opposing them in a peaceful and positive manner even a better thing.

    Look, in the end, you and I are never gonna agree. That’s cool. But I would love to hear…you don’t have the time, and why should you do it in response to me, but I would love to hear just what is this “consensus” you celebrate?  What are it’s policy goals?     

  • T Perky

    Flailing – with an L. Maybe I should have used the word coalition instead of consensus – if the left wants to see its policy goals met, we’ll have to create our own message machine and not give up at the first sign of trouble. We agree on the things we want, just not on how we’re going to get them. I just can’t see how tearing down the only vehicle we have in the race gets us closer to the finish line. Preemptively throwing yourself under the bus only means you’ll get run over faster.

  • T Perky

    Flailing – with an L. Maybe I should have used the word coalition instead of consensus – if the left wants to see its policy goals met, we’ll have to create our own message machine and not give up at the first sign of trouble. We agree on the things we want, just not on how we’re going to get them. I just can’t see how tearing down the only vehicle we have in the race gets us closer to the finish line. Preemptively throwing yourself under the bus only means you’ll get run over faster.

  • jonst

    Ah, a spelling correction, in a comment.  And you start your reply with the correction. Well, I stand chastised.  I’m dubious we “agree on the things we want”. You have not outlined any policy choices. You just continue to attack and at the same time attempt to dump guilt delivered in the sports cliches.  It is utterly ridiculous for you to state I am “giving up at the first sign of trouble”.  I am not “giving up” and asking off the bus. I never was on the bus to begin with. It is a Neoliberal bus….and I have seen, since Carter, where this bus is headed to.  And I have seen, since Carter, where this bus takes the people.  “We” do not have a “vehicle” in this bus…you do.He is your canidate and I salute staying with him.  We simply disagree on policy. And rest assured, or not, I have no plans to throw myself in front of the bus. I won’t have to. The Neo’s will (sadly….it brings me no great pleasure to suggest this) wreck the bus themselves. He rides away from the people….the people will ride away from him.

    And by the way…..It is the “Left” with a capital L Perkey, not a small “l”.

  • T Perky

    Sorry to have bothered you. That chip on you shoulder’s making it hard for you to comprehend what I’m trying to say. You should have it looked at. 

  • jonst

    You did not bother me….you saddened me.

  • jonst

    You did not bother me….you saddened me.

  • T Perky

    I’m flattered that you think so, darlin’, but I’ve been lurking here long enough to know you did that to yourself a long time ago. Epistemic closure isn’t just for the right anymore.

    Thanks for the conversation though, it was very informative and fun. 

  • Momly

    Jumpin’ Jehosephat, “wrapping” either of those buses will just invite bombs of the REAL variety. I wonder if there will be any decoy buses along for the ride for either candidate. Yeah, I am THAT paranoid about the state of our national politics these days.