BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Friday, May 25, 2012

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement



August 17, 2011

Thuggish Cameron Thinks Graffiti’s Got His Back

NewImage

NewImage


Prime Minister Cameron “denied that racial tensions, poverty, or his government’s controversial austerity cuts were to blame. He claimed there were around 120,000 problem families in Britain who had little respect for authority, singling out boys raised without a male role model as especially prone to ‘rage and anger’,” The Christian Science Monitor reported yesterday.

“These riots were not about race: The perpetrators and the victims were white, black, and Asian. These riots were not about government cuts: They were directed at high street stores, not Parliament,” said the Conservative prime minister. “And these riots were not about poverty: That insults the millions of people who, whatever the hardship, would never dream of making others suffer like this.

“No, this was about people showing indifference to right and wrong, people with a twisted moral code, people with a complete absence of self-restraint,” he said.

– from: Cameron’s London riots speech raises British ire (CSM)

I’m confused. I suppose Team Cameron chose to situated its “law and order” screed in front of a graffiti mural at a youth center to signify that the same culture that spawns such art is about to get its head handed to it?

Don’t they get that graffiti, and the combination of alienation, frustration, and yearning for identity and expression that underpins it, is the exact thing that Cameron is denying? Unless I’m missing something here, this has got to be one of the most blind and provocative political images I’ve seen in some time.

Maybe the government looks at this mural and sees “gang banger” and “riot perpetrator,” and assumes the folks at home see the exact same thing (with the further suggestion that “evil doers” — in some twisted, macho, “kill or be killed” scenario, are threatening to swallow up even the PM). I’m sure an awful lot of people, though, including the “bad poor” and the “good poor” alike, look at this mural — and Cameron’s indictment — and just see the name and the hand of those who have no voice.

For a second pic on London’s riot politics — why don’t they just ban the hoodie? — see this shot at BagTumblr.

(photo: Alastair Grant- WPA Pool/Getty Images caption: Prime Minister David Cameron speaks at a youth center in his constituency on August 15, 2011 in Witney, England. Following four days of riots last week that left five people dead, thousands facing criminal charges and at least 200 million in property losses, Cameron spoke on the break-down of morality, family values and human rights within Britain.)

  • Michael

    Yes, in that second photo it’s the show of hands that nails the contradiction and conflict. Only a PR minder who was deaf to the one side could suppose that there was a single message conveyed by placing Cameron’s podium there. It might have been more sensible to put him in front of a patch of disorganized graffiti instead. Then it would have been more persuasively a case of order vs chaos. But as it turned out, it does look more like one form of order vs an alternative order. They may need one another, but it’s not a good idea to make that so blatantly obvious.

    This descent into the lowest common tabloid rhetoric was maybe inevitable, since that is the refuge when politicians really don’t have a clue about what to do. The British civil service is always able to serve up some tasty number, in this case ‘120,000 broken families’, which ministers and their minders can polish into truthiness. There is one small light in the darkness, though, since some Lib Dem MPs are clear that this polarizing overreaction is loony.

  • Anonymous

    …said the Conservative prime minister. “And these riots were not about poverty: That insults the millions of people who, whatever the hardship, would never dream of making others suffer like this.

    There is nothing in the Conservative prime minister’s well-fed mien — the crisp shirt and tie, the immaculately manicured facial features and coiffure, the robust complexion — nothing that hints of poverty. When he speaks of poverty, it is not likely he speaks from experience. For the record, Mr Prime Minister and First Lord of the Treasury, poverty is a form of suffering.

  • marc sobel

    In the linked article:  
     ”For example, Mr Cameron said that the problem of police officers being snowed under by bureaucracy “will be fixed by completely changing the way the police work”.”

    Along with the collective punishment (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_punishment) of throwing the families of “suspected” rioters on the street, it now appears that there will be creative police work, like the creative accounting that got us into this mess.

  • Anonymous

    I opened the page and saw Cameron’s lips and eyes and then my eyes were drawn to the painting of the young black person hiding in a hoody and felt I was witnessing the PM’s hissy fit. “..Just because we shot someone here doesn’t mean you can get mad at us…” I imagined a not well thought out rant of what happened, just from the image of the pinched Prime Minister’s face… I expected Cameron to rattle off a bunch of disjointed thoughts on the class system, followed by some names of unconnected laws, with a not very well hid hint of racism and topped with a full blown temper tantrum with arms flailing and then, …Cameron running off stage left, crying in a handkerchief.

  • Pingback: Blogs on Parade: “The Negro’s Revenge” edition « BTC News: If It Says ‘News,’ It Must Be True

  • Pastafarian

    I don’t understand. Graffiti is now racialized? 

    Good gravy, it’s the art form of at least two generations now. 

  • Whimofah

    Cameron is a squawking potato of course: but Base 33 is not a hoody gang. “Base 33 plays an important role in the community and offers hope and
    support to young people who have lost their way” – David Cameron.