BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Friday, May 25, 2012

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement



June 29, 2011

“Diana at 50″: Newsweek’s Perverse Newsstand Seance

Newsweek Diana at 50

1. Two things that made the aged Diana come off so much like a freak that it disgusted and scared (scarred?) all those LAT readers.

First, the picture screws with us because the body language contradicts itself so badly, there’s no way the reader can psychologically put it together. You have the strained neck, cheek and chin muscles combined with an otherwise pleasant mouth, matched with that riveted, straight-ahead stare which quickly turns space-alien when combined with those heavy black lines replacing the upper eye lids — all this happening atop a body with an otherwise breezy, free-flowing gait. (And, did I mention the dissimilar arms and the anorexia vibe in Diana’s right arm and face?)

Second, the neck, cheek and chin telegraph so much tension, even anger, Diana comes off like a creature from one royal horror show.

2. What an abusive thing to do to Kate Middleton! I could understand raising Diana’s ghost around the royal wedding, but to raise the dead like this, and then make make the freak the consuming object of Kate’s attention — Diana the ghost-angel, mostly in white, while Kate skews to the black (most extreme in the hats).  And then, I wouldn’t go so far as to reference a limo crash — there’s is the hint of a car in the background which somehow disappears beyond Diana’s left shoulder — but the tension in the illustration is certainly increased by the severe body guard dude.

3. With this cover, Lady Evans’- uh, I mean, Tina Brown’s editorial judgement, short-circuited by her intense identification with Diana (note the book, see the pic), has spun out of control. Notice how, by the way, with the byline, Kate’s not the only woman who appears, side-by-side, with the Princess.

  • bks

    The zombie apocalypse has claimed Princess Di?  Good, maybe someone will blast her head off with a shotgun and we can get over the American fascination with the vestigial British royal family.  Blow off
    “Kate”’s head too –it’s the only way to be sure.

    Much, much more interesting magazine cover:

    http://images.newstatesman.com/afghanistan-new.jpg

        –bks

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=810889128 Molly Whipple Douthett

    Well, I don’t think shooting Kate is the answer, frankly. What’s she done except marry someone?

    Anyhoo, I wonder who got decapitated so Di’s head could be substituted? I would be angry and horrified. 

    • bks

       What has she done?  Look at that hat!

          –bks

  • http://twitter.com/caryconover Cary Conover

    I immediately felt that it was perverse before reading the apt headline of this post. Aside from it being inappropriate, bad taste, etc. it just looks stupid. Just for simple, off-the-top-of-my-head reference, she’d only have been three years older than FLOTUS, and we all know how how well she takes care of herself.

    One thing is for sure, if Diana hadn’t been killed we certainly wouldn’t have such casual, household use of the word paparazzi.

  • http://www.petercalvin.com Peter A. Calvin

    For me, the worst thing about this image is the magazine that it appears on. One of the two national news magazines reduced to supermaket tabloid.  

  • Anonymous

    Absolutely ghastly! If Tina Brown has done this to a person she did admire, what can we anticipate her doing to persons she didn’t admire?

  • http://ralfast.wordpress.com/ Ralfast

    Creep me out. Can’t we let the dead rest or burden the living with impossible comparisons?