Archives About Staff BagNews is dedicated to visual politics, media literacy and the analysis of news images.
May 12, 2011

Unit 4 in Danger of Collapse? (And Then, Don’t Tell Me There’s Nothing To See at Fukushima)

Beyond the novelty that Fukushima was back in the news at all, two things characterize Thursday’s BBC update. One is how shockingly brief it is, like a dashed of summary. The other is the almost casual tone it takes in listing through the nightmarish situations throughout the plant, especially the acknowledged meltdown in Unit 1.

It is often noted that the Fukushima story remains invisible because radiation is invisible, and/or the plant photos and video being released by TEPCO are also too abstract or technical. That begs the question, then, just how much is the danger hard to visualize as opposed to how much does the world (especially traditional media) have its eyes closed?

One piece of visible information that has floating to the surface, by way of indy media and the blogosphere, in the past few days regards the structural integrity of Unit 4.  Dr. Robert Jacobs, a Nuclear Historian at the Hiroshima Peace Institute, offered this diagram in an interview on Tuesday with Russia Today. According to Jacobs (which he says has been confirmed by the Japanese Government) , Unit 4 is starting to lean, a collapse certain to expose the fuel rod pools at the top of the building.

(It’s not like there isn’t a trail of additional images in the ’sphere, as well, by the way — all available for vetting by a more curious media. Following the de-evolution of Unit 4, for example, blogger Andrew Higgins offers screen shots of the building reduced to a shell over the first week in May. Higgins, using screen shots purportedly from Japanese television, also reports a fire at the plant on May 8th associated with a radiation spike, both of which, he claims, went unreported on the same day big media cited a Government-touted drop in radiation levels.)

Certainly, TEPCO did not neglect Unit 4 as a visual subject, at least in the early weeks after the disaster.

Here is a view of southwest side of Unit 4 on April 11th.

And there was this shot from a helicopter of Unit 4 taken on March 16th.

Since April 11 th, however, the only pictures TEPCO has released of Unit 4 have been video downloads, taken underwater of the fuel rod pools, one released on April 29th and the other on May 8th.

So, I guess — and Dr. Jacob’s fuzzy and disturbing illustration drives this home — what we’re sadly lacking from Fukushima (the vagaries of science and radiation as much an excuse as a reason) is a bigger and much better picture of this still-boiling disaster.

updated 11:50 pm PST

photos: TEPCO

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/George-Mokray/767686527 George Mokray

    Safecast.org is building a citizens’ radiation monitoring network. Here is one of their recent radiation dose surveys:

    http://blog.safecast.org/2011/05/10/a-radiation-dose-survey/

    That should help make the invisible radiation more visible.

  • Anonymous

    thanks for dealing with this story which has vanished from America

  • Raineagle

     It is most likely that  reactors 1 ,2 and 3 are all breached and leaking. The incorrect readings TEPCO was announcing up to the beginning of their current Government inspection were all just attempts of trying to hide the truth. Im sure the other guages are not working properly either. What happened to one in this case happened to all. Its logical that they all ran out of water. That now can be expected and is evident. But 3 is a different story that will be like hitting a brick wall for TEPCO. The fuel that was in the pool is vaporized and blown to bits and scattered for miles on land and sea. This is the worse case scenerio. The severely radiated water is in no way contained and is still flowing into the Ocean. Chucks of MOX fuel lay radiating in the sea bed. The lyes have snowballed to enormous proportions that must be corrected immediately. Their refusal to allow Greenpeace in the area is proof they are hiding the truth. It is one thing to keep the people safe by not causing panic. But it is another when they are not given the knowledge to make their own intelligent decision. They actually believe by sending children into the area to go back to school the unaware public and news media will in some way believe its safe. I question their judgement. safe by not causing panic. But it is another when they are not given the knowledge to make their own intelligent decision. They actually believe by sending children into the area to go back to school the unaware public and news media will in some way believe its safe. I question their judgement.

Refresh Archives

Random Notes