BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement

April 5, 2011

Split Screens: Administration Caves on Terror Trials

By juxtaposing this CNN split screen with Eric Holder’s real-time announcement that the Administration was doing a 180° and giving up on civilian terror trials on domestic soil, the Getty photograph fronting today’s NYT spells out the politics plain and clear.

Having buckled under to the fear mongers, Team Obama has bought themselves this graphic shouting out — in triplicate, yes — how the Administration has elevated Bush’s Muslim panic and the knee-jerk fears of the “evil doers” (in the loaded image of a bin Laden-evoking Khalid Sheikh Mohammed) to equal status with a confident, secure and democratic form of justice (in the symbol of the US Attorney General).

  • Paul Moment

    I check in with Bag for a lot of things, but not necessarily nuance. It’s sad to see sites like this missing the opportunity to focus on the very important context in favor of a story with an easy good guy/bad guy framing and an obviously dumb, but popular, premise – a “weak” administration and dithering President.

    Any political journalist knows the amount of budgetary roadblocks and FUD levers that Congress can pull when its own self interest is at stake. They blocked the closing of Guantanamo (remember Obama announcing the effort to close it almost immediately?), and they were largely responsible for abdicating the rule of law and forcing the administration’s hand on these terror trials by whipping up all kinds of nightmare scenarios about housing terrorists in the middle of our cities. They, and the American people. This post gets it right:

    http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2011/4/5/123749/3323

    I’m still flabbergasted at the self-righteous glee that the Left has in savaging it’s own, especially after 2.5 years of some of the most substantial progressive legislation we’ve had in a long time on a wide variety of fronts in the face of unprecedented opposition, and real measurable accomplishments. But, like I said, I’ve finally begun to acquiesce to the reality that nuance isn’t something I’m going to get from most political coverage on either side of the ideological spectrum.

    • http://www.bagnewsnotes.com Michael Shaw

      Thanks for the comment and your props to many things Bag. I appreciate your point, as emphasized by booman, that this situation slipped away as much because Bloomberg and the Dem Congress didn’t have Obama’s back. That acknowledged, though, I want to say that it’s the news photo that lacks nuance. Sure, I plead guilty to venting some knee-jerk frustration, but it seems the photo speaks to a similar conclusion (regardless of the causality). Along those lines, what I see is CNN, fairly or otherwise, elevating KSM to the same level as the back-peddling AG. Call it a failure for America, then, for the failure to stand up for the rule of (non-military) law. The split-screen still reads like a victory for fear.

    • jonst

      I strongly (but regretfully, not “gleefully”, self righteous or other wise…and what a strawman that was) disagree with Booman, and by implication, I assume, you, if you think this Administration is “restoring the rule of law”. As to “substantial progressive legislation”, I am rooting for it….but not waiting for it any more.

      And as to “unprecedented opposition”, I don’t know if you were around when Jimmy Carter was office, but I assume you were when they, remember, IMPEACHED and TRIED Clinton. So…you want to speak about nuance….you should try some.

      Personally, I don’t think this particular example (the decision to restore to Military Tribunals) is the best evidence that this is a “weak administration, and a dithering President. The Dems in Congress are the real villains, going along with the GOP efforts to whip up fear and hysteria. I think there are much better ones examples to prove the point.