BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Thursday, May 24, 2012

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement



December 23, 2010

I’d Stick to the Reindeer

Credit:  AP Photo/The Repository, Scott Heckel

I remember as a child watching over and again the post-World War II movie Miracle on 34th St. (1947), a story about a man who looks rather like the elfish chap above and is institutionalized as insane when he declares himself to be Kris Kringle—the real Santa Claus.  Claiming to be Santa Claus, it seems, can be something of a threat to public safety, and it is only with the help of a lawyer who persuades the local post office to deliver thousands of children’s letters addressed to “Santa Claus” to his client that he is able to get the state to acknowledge his true identity and thus establish his sanity.  And the moral of the story was that sometimes it isn’t such a bad idea to believe in fantasies—or miracles—at least a little bit.

Of course, that was then and this is now.  The late 1940s were something of an age of anxiety, to be sure, but now we live in the so-called age of terror.  And today, not even an army of ACLU lawyers can save Santa Claus from the indignities of being patted and probed by the uniform wearing the rubber blue glove.  After all, in an age of terror anyone can be hiding a bomb inside his or her clothing: pilots, grandmothers, and even babies in blankets.  Why should Old St. Nick be any different?  And really, what is the loss of a “little” freedom—in some ways just another fantasy—in the interest of maintaining national security and public safety?  Or so it would seem.

My initial impulse upon seeing the photograph above was to smile at the incongruity of a fantasy figure being treated by the apparatus of a national security state as if he were real and wondering who the sane and the insane might be.  But then it struck me that there was nothing amusing here at all.  That indeed, what we are looking at is a very real and tragic sluice of contemporary life, a world in which even our most hopeful fantasies have been taken away and no one seems to notice … or maybe even care. Notice the man on the left who doesn’t appear to be paying any attention whatsoever and who appears to be absorbed with preparing himself for the blue glove. It is this last point, so blatantly on display in the above picture, that is the most troubling of all  and suggests that just maybe the terrorists have already won.

Crossposted at nocaptionneeded.

Help fund Bag’s unique mission: Reading news pics for media bias and political spin, and the publication of independent photojournalism. I’m asking each reader to please contribute at least $20 to help underwrite our expenses … or more if you can afford it. Each $20 also buys you a raffle ticket for prints and photo books signed by Bag’s contributors, as well as entry to our NY party if you’re in the neighborhood on the 29th. Click here now to donate, to see what’s in the raffle and get directions to the party. Thanks so much!  – Michael.

  • black dog barking

    The late 1940s were something of an age of anxiety, to be sure, but now we live in the so-called age of terror.

    Then: civilization had just finished bombing and burning most of Europe to the ground. From those ruins rose two opposing monoliths each armed with a new weapon that could burn the whole world to the ground if anyone decided, for whatever reason, to use it.

    Now: Santa stands stocking-footed for inspection before flying commercial because some middle class Saudis armed with box cutters hijacked some commercial jets and turned them into bombs nearly ten years ago.

    In one of these scenarios people responded by rebuilding and repopulating, by making something better. In the other people responded by being afraid.

    BTW, the green vest is a good look for St Nick. Is that Mrs Claus moonlighting for TSA? Downsizing at the North Pole, Santa flies commercial these days?

  • Vvoter

    I don’t want to deny that there are ways to read TSA activity in tragic terms. Lucaites certainly articulates the problem, or the tragedy, of freedom in a post 9/11 world.

    Meanwhile, I can’t help but read this analysis in light of a favorite criticism often advanced by conservatives (I’ll reference Dinesh D’Souza on this point), who like to decry the reflexive liberalism and anti-statism so often expressed by professors in America’s leading universities.

    Here, Lucaites dips his analytic arrows in the rhetoric of sanity; his analysis does not stop at a (justifiable, I would grant) criticism of federal intrusion. It argues much more than that. His analysis calls into question the most fundamental psychological orientation of the state.

    My concern here is that ideology drives this analysis, and as soon as I admit that concern, I hear the D’Souzas of the world reverting back to that all-too-easy indictment of the university system as a breeding ground for an ideological orientation grounded in resistance to the US military and the national security apparatus. (Think ROTC and DADT). And not only criticism or resistance, but a suggestion here that the object of criticism may just, in fact, be insane.

    I’d call it a sophisticated version of dismissiveness: a refusal to affirm in the object of criticism even the most fundamental component of validity. Does it have to be this way?

  • http://www.nocaptionneeded.com lucaites

    Vvoter: Your point is very well taken. And indeed, I share the concern of your final statement concerning “the refusal to affirm in the object of criticism even the most fundamental component of validity.” Truth to tell, I do agree that it is way too easy to convert an airplane into an instrument of terror and in that context TSA has an important function. The tragedy I was trying to point to — and I think in the end not as effectively as I could or should have … the other common mistake of us academics is that sometime we are too subtle for our own good — is not quite so much the loss of dignity (which I do bemoan), but the fact that we seem to have become completely normalized to it –what appears to be insanity has become sanity. What the photo shows is precisely that we have accommodated to a national security state. It may be needed, but that doesn’t make it any less tragic.