BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Thursday, May 23, 2013

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement

June 23, 2010

Your Turn: Getting Above It

photo: Staff Sgt. Lorie Jewell/Multi-National Forces Iraq Public Affairs via Getty Images

Destiny?  It’s particularly interesting reading this shot of candidate Obama and the General almost two years later. Your thoughts?

(caption: Sen. Barack Obama listens as Gen. David H. Petraeus discusses security improvements in Baghdad while giving him and Sens. Jack Reed and Chuck Hagel an aerial tour of the city Monday. July 21, 2008)

  • DennisQ

    Obama looks like a cool dude. But there’s no way that he would look today as Black as he does in this picture. The right wingers would be so aghast they’d be doing back flips.

  • jonst

    “Obama looks like a cool dude”? To you perhaps. To me he looks like one more shill trying to sell me a war.

    • qwer

      ha! Looks cool… so did Fonzi jumping the shark

  • http://justbetweenstrangers.blogspot.com/ acm

    The body language here gives me “newbie to things war, observing an Experienced Military Man in action.” I guess in the intervening years, Obama grew into his role as Commander in Chief, and knew better than to take crap from somebody unclear on the chain of command…

  • Gerry Desrosiers

    I don’t know about “cool” in the fashionable sense, but he did seem “cool” in the rational, dispassionate sense. I remember thinking , when I first saw this picture, that Obama seemed more credible than Michael Dukakis did in his Snoopy ears driving a tank.

    I don’t agree with Obama about a lot of things, but he does have my respect. He’s not a fool. And, despite being handed a shitload of problems, he keeps cleaning out the stable, day after day.

    We finally have adult supervision.

    • lytom

      How about some new refreshing and original approach one that would truly be different, so he would not have to clean the shit out of the stables day in and day out? Wasn’t that the famous “change” used over and over again?
      How long is the excuse of “shitload of problems” going to be used?

      You mean Big Brother?

  • lytom

    There is no “Getting above it”
    The deal is !it is your responsibility, Obama!
    War criminal with a war criminal chief.
    Looks like a mean couple: enabler and enabled…
    Well, what is the tally sheet?
    How many civilian casualties, how about destruction of the countries, Iraq and Afghanistan? Illegal drone strikes? Occupation without the end in sight…
    How about the measurement of happiness from all of this?

  • http://www.agrippinaminor.com/wp/ Wayne Dickson

    If the photo had been made today, the president’s hair would be a lot more gray! Being president is almost as stressful and wearing as pretending to be blond bimbo on Mox News, as Gretchen Carlson reminded us.

  • http://keepittrill.blogspot.com/ Kit (Keep It Trill)

    Awesomely cool, both then and now. Michael, I kind of recall you comparing this to a Bush photo with GWB looking remote, and Barack looking involved and learning as much in that helicopter trip as he could.

    Man, so much has happened since then. If people had protested Bush then, than they wouldn’t have shit to complain about now.

  • matt

    it’s all in the shades.

  • robert e

    Not difficult to see a movie still here, perhaps with Denzel Washington and Kevin Kostner in place of President and General. What would be the plot?

    Despite the physical proximity of the men, the prominent, outsized headsets isolate and mediate their communications, and allude to the mix of high-tech weaponry and primitive ground struggle, and the cultural and linguistic divides, that characterize this war. Obama, is even more difficult to read than usual, obscured as he is by shades, shadow and distance, but he seems intent on his companion, who seems focused on more distant things.

  • http://sozadee.blogspot.com/ Vigilante

    Obama is a useful idiot for the military-industrial complex.