BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Monday, February 13, 2012

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement



December 2, 2009

The New Yorker’s Platon Layout: Obama Pre-AfPak

NewYorker-Platon-UN-Obama-A.jpg
(Click for larger size)

Oh, I’m going to miss print when it’s finally gone.

All kinds of activists and photo people have been linking to the on-line New Yorker portraits by Platon taken at September’s U.N. General Assembly opening session, which is where I saw them too. This evening, though, I had a chance to liberate the real-live print edition from my wife and the way the photos are laid out in the mag is as interesting as the pics — and definitely more provocative.

So naturally, I wanted to like to share the facing pages above.

Of course, I’m interested in your take on Platon’s Obama — reflecting not just Prez taking on the world that week (1, 2) but his portrait in the waning weeks of his freshman year. And I’m even more interested in your take on the pairing, Ahmadinejad bearing the color, his visage like a creature from the dark.

My personal curiosity, though, is the editorial juxtaposition.

Maybe it’s the effect of this week’s momentous Afghanistan pivot, but this pairing, clearly attempting to stir the pot, suddenly reads oh, so “Bush second term.” If the editor really wanted to stick his or her neck out, while upping the “surge ante,” I’d have said, give me Obama vs. Zardari.

UPDATE 4pm PST

Platon and The New Yorker should know better!

If you read through the discussion thread, you know I was guilty of assuming the photo shoot Platon did at the U.N. — involving 110 world leaders taken in the Green Room just off the General Assembly hall over 5 days in September, the photographer working around the clock at the opening session, as Platon proudly points out — actually included Barack Obama.

What I failed to pick up and sharper-eyed readers did was the fact that the date of the photo — a 3-year-old portrait Platon pulled out of the file and inserted into the New Yorker’s “Portraits of Power” feature in the magazine this week — was included in the print caption. Having first seen the feature on-line, I completely overlooked the caption in the print edition. The bigger problem, however, is that nowhere in the web version of the New Yorker piece does it say that Platon didn’t shoot Obama in September leading anyone who saw it on-line to assume he did.

Beyond that, the decision to include the Obama file photo in the print edition in a feature billed as photographically documenting the Heads of State at the September U.N. meeting — and then, going so far to juxtapose the Obama file photo with Platon’s U.N. portrait of Ahmadinejad, taking editorial advantage of the tension of the two attending the same meeting, Obama’s first General Assembly session as U.S. President (which formed the basis of my post about the New Yorker layout) — is also disingenuous.

I believe the New Yorker owes it readers notice in the on-line edition that the Obama photo is not part of the series. I also believe they owe readers an apology for including Obama’s photo in the printed series, regardless of the caption.

(photos: Platon for The New Yorker)

  • http://bildungblog.blogspot.com Fearguth

    Barack’s photo wasn’t taken at the UN at the time the others were. It’s one Platon had taken earlier.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/bagnews Michael Shaw (The BAG)

    Sorry Fearguth, but you’re wrong.

    Check out the New Yorker’s MP3 interview with Platon where he describes doing the shoot, including Obama, in the Green Room just off the General Assembly hall, where he photographed 110 world leaders. Otherwise, could you imagine the scandal if Platon and The New Yorker actually swapped in an old portrait of Obama when the whole point of this project was to capture every Head of State, around the clock over 5 days, specifically during September’s U.N. session?

    (You’re probably thinking of Platon’s cover photo of Obama for TIME’s Democratic convention cover which appeared in August ‘08. Before that, by the way, Platon also photographed Obama for the December 10, 2007 cover of TIME, and there’s also a photo — which I have seen variations of — which he did of Obama sitting with legs crossed for the October ‘08 issue of The New Yorker.)  

  • Chuck Albertson

    Michael,
    Fearguth is correct. If you listen to Platon’s audio commentary on the Obama portrait itself (click on the audio link underneath the portrait), rather than the full interview, he makes it clear that Obama didn’t want to sit for him during the UN session. Also, the caption underneath Obama’s portrait in the print edition says it was taken in 2006.

  • Lenny

    The captions seems weird (and another little thing to be missed with the loss of print). Maybe the focus on birth date makes more sense in the context of the whole article, but are they trying to say something about birthers and Obama image-making?

  • shoeflyin

    Just got the print copy in the mail yesterday, the whole series is pretty fascinating. To answer Lenny’s comment – all of them were captioned with their position, country, date of birth and the date they took power in their current position.

  • Lenny

    In the pic above, Obama’s is captioned with the date and location (Chicago) of the photo then the date of his birth.

  • http://bildungblog.blogspot.com Fearguth

    Thanks, Chuck!

  • http://profile.typepad.com/bagnews Michael Shaw (The BAG)

    My bad, and my apologies, Fearguth (and also, thanks to Chuck).
    The MP3 isn’t completely clear that Platon missed Obama, but listening to it again, he definitely alludes that getting Khaddafi blew his chance at Obama. Of course, though, and big duh! to me — it’s right there in the print caption!
    I have to also say I’m thoroughly disappointed The New Yorker went ahead and included a 3 year old photo of Obama (which is why, I’m thinking, I didn’t want to see it.) I also wonder what Platon really felt about coughing up a file photo because it’s an incredibly cheap move which clearly diminishes the integrity of his project — at least this presentation of it.
    By the way, and Lenny gets at this just below: how would anyone seeing the on-line edition (which is probably a big number) every know the difference? Where’s the disclosure?

  • http://bildungblog.blogspot.com Fearguth

    No problema, Michael. I’m one of your biggest 5′ 8″ fans.

  • lq

    I looked at Ahmadinejad and felt frozen with fear. I looked at Netanyahu and chuckled (you understand if you read the text – ‘Make me look good, Michael’), Abbas was next to Netanyahu and looked more open, less taken with himself. Jacob Zuma looks like he was just about to do something really important (and he did!) – paired with Mugabe, it was a welcome contrast. Putting Brian Cowen (open faced) and Gordon Brown (how did he ever get such a casual photo of the PM?) on the same page as the Presidents of Croatia and Serbia was a heck of a statement. Knowing how very much the Serbs still hate the Croats, and how much farther along the Brits and Irish may be – well, perhaps there is hope. The pairing which gave me chills down my spine was Evo Morales and Hugo Chavez on facing pages. Quite a coda to a pictorial display/manipulation. I realized right away it was a file shot of Obama (he looks so much younger, for one thing) – but the rest of the photo display was so much more important to someone who doesn’t see photos of world leaders on a daily basis. Some of these guys are really scary – right up there with GWBush with his squinty eyes.

  • Sondra

    The way I viewed it at first was just the top 1/2 of Ahmadinnajacket’s face. His eyes are smiling and pleasant then scroll down and the rest of his face is hard.