Comments on: BAG Archive Edition: Early Signs Of Sarah Palin’s Radical Agenda?

By: Dede

Dede — Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:18:57 +0000

Maybe Dems value intellegnece, character, morals, decency, commom sense, education, you know, stuff that really matters. Just saying.

By: howlin' sandy

howlin' sandy — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:09:17 +0000

Vacant smile flashes
Pretty plastic ad selling
“Vacant Space Upstairs”
© sgs

By: Debra

Debra — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:01:59 +0000

Thanks for your comment. I agree that Johanna’s comment was one of the stupidest comments ever. It’s hard to believe someone actually thinks that way. But then again, George Bush was POTUS. That fact alone gives me great pause when I consider the intelligence of the average American voter.

By: Debra

Debra — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:57:41 +0000

It is strange to me that people comment about Palin’s beauty. Tina Fey has never been held up to the public as a beautiful woman, yet she and Palin could be twins because they look so much alike. Palin is not beautiful, though she is attractive in an average kind of way.

By: elpinche

elpinche — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:30:10 +0000

i agree. she’s an anti-american idiot, but them t1tties ain’t anti-american.

By: geek_lah@yahoo.com

geek_lah@yahoo.com — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:56:34 +0000

Johanna…..It takes Republicans to bash women and feminism, and make comments like Rush Limbaugh asking Americans if they wanted to see Hillary Clinton age before them. It takes every republican “MAN” in congress to vote against the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. Your whole comment on the physical attractiveness of women politicians is ABSURD. By your logic, a woman has to be young and pretty so that she has the time and energy to govern! You devalue yourself as a woman and all women for that matter. Pathetic.
This is probably the stupidest comment I have EVER heard.
Try this on for size….where will your loyalties to Palin be when she is as old, wrinkled and doing all of the same things that you accuse Hillary, Pelosi, and Boxer of doing? Will you then trade down for some more “efficient” model with less experience and throw away her VAST experience and contributions? Or is it a new Republican value to throw someone away after they put in the time, loyalty and hard work?
I don’t think I buy that you the poster is a woman. If you are, then you are truly empty headed.

By: Johanna

Johanna — Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:37:03 +0000

Here’s where you’re wrong to commend the Dems for preferring, as you call them “strong, intelligent women”. These older women are spending tens of thousands of dollars, and hundreds of man hours of work, on their appearances. This goes for Hillary, Pelosi and Barbara Boxer. In order to approximate “babeness”, they are constantly frequently the offices of doctors who specialize in botox, other skin fillers, plastic surgery, cosmetic dentistry, etc. It takes a huge effort to keep up that appearance in the later years. There’s something to be said for legislators who are not making the effort — like Mikulski. That mammoth effort was, I believe, the true reason behind Hillary’s tears on the campaign trail. She began to cry when she spoke of getting up early in the morning. She probably needed two hours ahead of Obama, who, like the other men, could just shower, shave, and put on a non descript suit. This huge effort is largely secret — no one speaks of the struggle, no one writes about it. Dems, getting actually young women, rather than older ones approximating youth, would give you a group of legislators who had more free time and psychological energy to govern.

By: womanwithsardinecan

womanwithsardinecan — Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:51:01 +0000

While looks may be “important in our time,” I don’t find it “odd” that the Dems haven’t found themselves a babe. There are plenty of very attractive women in office, but they lack the studied babe-ness of Palin. She makes a point of being as gorgeous as she can be, enhancing her natural good looks with lots of makeup, and she often wears clothes that are unprofessional. She deliberately uses her looks to get ahead and stay in the limelight. I commend the Dems for not searching out super-babes, instead preferring strong, intelligent women who know how to govern. When Palin opens that pretty mouth, the toxins and the stupid flow out.

By: yg

yg — Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:35:14 +0000

she looks normal, but she’s a wackadoodle.
nomoremisterniceblog found sarah using larouchian arguments.

By: Johanna

Johanna — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:08:30 +0000

It’s not shallow. It’s simply a fact. Since looks are so important in our time (I don’t say they should be — they just are) it’s odd that the democrats have not come up with such a stunning politician. I think the problem is excessive loyalty to the women who are presently in office. Somehow, the glasses are a big part of her look. Why can’t there be a democratic senator that lovely? Her looks have made it possible for her to get her message out. Without them, no one would pay attention. There are attractive men among the democrats — just not women.