BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Saturday, May 25, 2013

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement

July 23, 2009

The Pathology Report on Obama’s “Comatose” Health Care Presser

Obama health presser1.jpg Obama Health presser 2.jpg

Responding to Digby’s take on last night’s press conference, one of her commenters, Jim, had this to offer:

It’s really un-friggin-believable that the press is blaming Obama tonight for their own bad press conference. Since THEY were the ones asking the questions, why didn’t they ask him what they wanted him to talk about? Obama sketched out a general picture of what he was after, yet almost NONE of them asked about any of the details– especially the public option– it was like they didn’t—what– maybe care?

At first, I found it odd — and very out of character, actually — that Getty Images would have included the second photo above in its edit. The commenter, however, brought into focus the feeling I had watching the press from the get-go. Whereas the inclination following this all-too-listless exercise was to conclude that Obama was ponderous (or doing a number), Obama — if you were really watching him — was energized, cool and impressively non-didactic in front of a press corps that mostly sat there like parched and wilted flowers. If by no other example, this “group affect” was blatantly demonstrated by the anesthetized reporters finally springing to life near the end of the session as soon as (crime! race! scandal!) the Gates incident came up.

Paying more respect to what, on first pass, seemed like a cheap shot-of-a-photo, the two-headed interpretation here is that either the media wasn’t all that interested in probing the substance and complexity of Obama’s presentation — or Obama’s emphasis on policy-over-politics left others dazed and confused.

(Update: Although I originally saw the photos above on the Getty Images website, it has come to my attention that the photo discussed above comes from the AFP edit of the press conference. AFP maintains its own staff of photographers and editors who make independent editorial choices separate from the Getty staff at such events. I appreciate the clarification and apologize for any misunderstanding.)

(image: Paul J. Richards, AFP/Getty Images. second caption: Two front row reporters listen as US President Barack Obama delivers remarks on health care during a prime-time press conference from the East Room of the White House July 22, 2009, in Washington, DC. Obama vowed to push affordable healthcare reform through this year and keep it from swelling the US deficit in a fresh bid to convince Americans to back his ambitious plan.)

  • Tena

    So much kvetching cause he didn’t get emotional, but was professorial instead.
    See, this is exactly what’s wrong with the American media – if it’s not a 3-ring circus, with Lindsey Lohan’s boobs in one ring and Michael Jackson’s autopsy in the other, they get bored and go to sleep.
    And just how bright are these folks? Look at the faces – they all say one thing: Duh, what’s he talking about?

  • paulo

    Maybe it would help if the questioners weren’t pre-selected and the press had to shout out to get Obama’s attention. At least that would keep them awake – maybe.

  • Tena

    Excuse me – first of all, let’s see the proof for your claim that the questions are selected in advance.
    You’re dead wrong on the second part – nobody shouted; Obama just called on reporters, one after the other – nobody was shouting. Ok, you’re wrong on that, so let’s see some proof you aren’t wrong on the first part of your claim.

  • http://www.woodka.com donna

    And most of us bloggers would do anything to be there and they wouldn’t even have to pay us to pay attention.
    Wonder why newspapers are dying and nobody watches TV news, hmmm…

  • doug

    You misunderstood. Paulo meant that if the reporters had to vie for attention by shouting, they might have been more alert and interested. I have no idea if the questions are preselected — since nobody had to vie for attention, I’m guessing they were. If they weren’t, what a bunch of lame ducks.
    Perhaps you should read something twice before getting so sharp. Jeez.

  • http://thenewsguysletters.blogspot.com/ Russ Nichols

    I was sitting there holding my breath waiting for Obama to utter the words “public option. He never did. And then when he finally tossed it to the press, it was 47 minutes into the session and FINALLY the guy from the Cleveland Plain Dealer said the words and there was a brief recognition of the issue and discussion by Obama. Talk radio has been going nuts over the issue for weeks now and none of these reporters could bring it up early in the press conference? Or Obama couldn’t have brought it up himself?
    The photo of the two reporters suggest to me they must have really excellent health coverage and are therefore out of touch and bored with the whole thing. Is Michael Jackson still dead?

  • Books Alive

    It’s my understanding that the papers, agencies, or stations know that their reporter will be called on in Obama’s pressers. He reads from a list, you may note. He sometimes looks out into the audience as he calls on the person, not knowing where they are sitting, I assume. For Robert Gibbs, tho’, there is a seating chart. So, you can say Tena is right – if you know your person is scheduled to be called on, you can pre-write your question.
    No one asking about the public option until the Cleveland Plain Dealer’s man and he’d been preempted by McClatchy’s having jumped up to be given the mike. Nuts!! Let’s have a do-over!

  • terraformer

    Sorry, but the reporter in the middle of the second photo looks just like Max Baucus.