BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Friday, May 24, 2013

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement

March 19, 2009

Smelling Blood

Geithner Obama MLK.jpg

I knew I should have grabbed a screen shot before the NYT replaced the Geithner photo leading their “AIG/Tim on the rocks” story. In many ways, however, this one leading the story now is more interesting.

The previous TG photo showed Tim, at a distance, alone at a conference table. Squeezed to the far left of the frame, he seemed like the loneliest man in the world. In the shot above, the sense of isolation is actually compounded, however, because Tim’s literally enveloped by the energetic Obama yet still seemingly lost in his head. Of course, the moral weight and visual jolt delivered in Obama’s alignment with MLK only drives home Tim’s isolation that much more. (Adding to the pop: it’s the first time I ‘ve see that bust show up in an Oval Office photo before.)

Dodd AIG.jpg

Also, take a look at this image of Chris Dodd on the newswire today. Between his expression and the other guy’s, it looks like he’s guilty of something. Dodd is in the bull’s eye (at least, the GOP bull’s eye) as the man who allowed language into the stimulus bill which facilitated the AIG bonuses going through. (Notice the last line in the caption below, by the way.)

I’m attracted to both photos for one reason. There’s na overwhelming sense right now, with all the venom and retribution reverberating around the Capitol, of blood in the water.

Update: Thanks to M. Scott Brauer for recovering the original Geithner photo mentioned above.

(image 1: Doug Mills/The New York Times. White House. March 2009. caption: Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner with President Obama last week during an economic briefing at the White House. image 2: Chip Somodevilla/Getty: caption: Senate Banking and Urban Affairs Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd (D-CT) leaves to vote during a hearing on bank supervision and regulation on Capitol Hill March 19, 2009 in Washington, DC. Dodd has become a point of focus in the AIG bonus story after he inserted language in the last economic stimulus bill that allowed the bonuses to be awarded to employees of the insurance giant. Dodd said he added the language at the request of the Obama Administration.)

  • http://motherrr.blogspot.com mcmama

    And as usual, the media leads with Republican talking points instead of thoughtful analysis.
    I’m nauseated by the whole thing, but most especially by the irresponsible reporting.

  • Stella

    Seems to me they’re going after Chris Dodd. I can’t watch any more.

  • http://www.thenewswriter.com newswriter

    I’m so completely annoyed with my colleagues, but then I’m quite accustomed to their using GOP talking points as news. Yeah, they’re going after Dodd. They think his senate seat is vulnerable. While they’re turning into pod people pointing and screaming at Dodd for adding the language, they forget that they argued for no restrictions AT ALL on compensation.

  • lytom

    Going after Dodd? What do you mean? Dodd is the one who got money from AIG (and not only he, but Obama too and who knows how many more?). Dodd is the one who put in the offensive language! History is unforgiving! Think, what would you write here, had it been a republican senator! They are all guilty, the whole Congress. Conspiring crowd, who wants to stay in power. How did they pass the Patriot Act? Overnight, no reading, no thinking!

  • Danny Guam

    uh, lytom?
    It’s my understanding that Dodd inserted language into the bill that restricted the bonuses and that language was changed at the insistence of Treasury to not restrict the bonuses.
    Or no?
    They may all be guilty as you say but just wanted to point that one aspect.

  • lytom

    Danny G, since you clarified that aspect, let me add to it. “Treasury insisted,” it seems it was someone whose name we do no know and who was not identified by Dodd. Why is that? If they were so unknown, then, why did he not check with their boss or even with some colleagues before he changed it? What is done cannot be undone, and responsibility is his.
    Regarding the contributions of AIG and other significant financial players to both parties’ coffers there go the souls and good intentions.

  • http://rosscalloway.com ross

    Why wouldn’t Sen. Dodd be in every one’s bulls eye?
    The notion that the AIG bonus exemption that was in the stimulus bill (that nobody read) came from Sen. Dodd is not a GOP talking point. It should be your talking point too. It also happens to be true. So, does that make you feel like you can trust him and his judgment? Is he the kind of person you want as chairman of the Senate Banking Committee?

  • cenoxo

    The media is swimming after the current Administration exactly as it should have hunted down the previous one. Shame on those Defeatocrats who say Team O hasn’t brought change to Washington…

    Caught in the web, Senator Dodd is manfully trying to protect his source, who finally owned up to it — CNN Politics, March 19, 2009: Geithner: Treasury pushed for bonus loophole.

    Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told CNN Thursday his department asked Sen. Chris Dodd to include a loophole in the stimulus bill that allowed bailed-out insurance giant American International Group to keep its bonuses.

    In an interview with CNN’s Ali Velshi, Geithner said the Treasury Department was particularly concerned the government would face lawsuits if bonus contracts were breached.

    Watch: Geithner on AIG bonuses

    Dodd admitted to CNN Wednesday he’d added the controversial provision after a Treasury official pushed for it. Earlier in the week, Dodd had said he had not played any role in the addition of the loophole.

    Geithner told Velshi Thursday he takes full responsibility for the situation.

    Addressing the next biggest oliphaunt in the White House, we must ask:

    • Did Timothy Geithner light the politically sticky AIG bonus bomb all by himself, or did Larry Summers give him the match?
    • Was this strategy discussed beforehand with President Obama? If so, when? If not, why not?

    Where (and where) do the big AIG bucks stop, exactly?

  • http://profile.typepad.com/6p011279095cc828a4 omen

    from wapo:

    Federal Reserve officials knew for months about bonuses at American International Group but failed to tell the Obama administration, according to government and company officials, exposing problems in a relationship that is vital to addressing the financial crisis.

    the former being something the AIG ceo also attested to at the hearings.
    yet we don’t hear republicans & corporate media demanding what did bernanke know and when did he know it.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/6p011279095cc828a4 omen

    Caught in the web, Senator Dodd is manfully trying to protect his source, who finally owned up to it
    yet, oddly enough, dodd has a history of scuttling attempts to curb executive pay:

    Despite industry opposition, the House approved Frank’s bill on a 269-to-134 vote on April 20, 2007. That same day, Obama introduced a version of the legislation in the Senate. The bill, which initially attracted only five cosponsors, was referred to the Senate banking committee. Weeks later, Obama sent a letter to Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), the chair of that committee, asking him to hold a hearing on the proposed law. Obama wrote:
    I believe public discussion and debate over executive compensation packages would force corporate boards to think twice before signing over millions of dollars to CEOs. Certainly, many CEOs are ably steering their firms and deserve their paychecks. But the rate at which executive pay has grown, as compared to stagnating wages among American workers, is rightfully frustrating shareholders and employees alike, especially given the lackluster performance of many of the companies paying these high salaries.
    Dodd, then running against Obama in the Democratic presidential primaries, apparently was not convinced. He held no hearings on the bill, and the measure met a quiet death in his committee.

    http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2009/03/geithner-aide-fought-ceo-pay-reform

  • cenoxo

    Well, we might reasonably expect AIG’s CEO to try and shift the blame somewhere.
    During the transition, did the outgoing Republicans and their media* not tell, or did the incoming Democrats and their media* not ask? Pick your POV and vilify as desired.
    With a new administration in charge of the White House, the problems the Republicans left behind have new owners: just because the previous occupants ignored them is not an excuse for the Democrats to ignore them again (unless we’re playing the same old shell game).
    *Distinctions without much difference.

  • cenoxo

    …omen said in reply to cenoxo…
    Caught in the web, Senator Dodd is manfully trying to protect his source, who finally owned up to it
    Forgive me for being too subtle. My comment lead-in was not an alibi for Senator Dodd, but merely a segue to Secretary Geithner.
    Dodd, not as reflexive as Bush, barely managed to duck one good old shoe, but Geithner — quite manfully, I might add — stood up and caught the second heel full in the face (now there’s a faint AIG logo imprinted in his forehead).
    In politics, virtue is frequently its own reward.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/6p011279095cc828a4 omen

    it wasn’t blame shifting. it was a statement of fact. a representative from the fed sits in on all of AIG meetings. the fed has had oversight from the beginning.

  • cenoxo

    I believe this is the Washington Post article you’re referring to: How the Fed Failed to Tell Obama About The Bonuses, March 19, 2009. Quoting further, it states:

    As pressure mounted on AIG employees to return the bonuses, new details emerged yesterday about what the Fed, the Treasury Department and the White House knew regarding the payments and when. AIG executives said the Fed was informed three months ago by the company that it would pay $165 million by March 15 to employees working at its most troubled division.
    The Treasury and White House said they learned of the payments from Fed officials only days before they were due.

    However, I don’t understand what you’re driving at.
    Are you saying that the White House — meaning President Obama — knew about the AIG bonuses months ago but now denies it (after acting outraged and using it for political advantage)? Or that the Fed failed to pass along the info and is now playing CYA?
    Explain more, please.