<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Positions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/2009/01/social-positions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/2009/01/social-positions/</link>
	<description>Reading the Pictures — Visual politics and the analysis of news images</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cenoxo</title>
		<link>http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/2009/01/social-positions/#comment-88212</link>
		<dc:creator>cenoxo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bnn.weightshift.com/2009/01/social-positions/#comment-88212</guid>
		<description>Compared to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/jacksoninauguration.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Frontier Andy Jackson&#039;s inaugural welcome&lt;/a&gt; of the Great Unwashed in 1829, Barack the New and (c&#039;mon) even George the Ex&#039;s polite drawing rooms look positively genteel.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.picturehistory.com/product/id/6606&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Margaret Bayard Smith&lt;/a&gt;, a Washington Whig socialite, reported on the invasion of the White House:&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;But what a scene did we witness! The Majesty of the People had disappeared, and a rabble, a mob, of boys, negros [sic], women, children, scrambling fighting, romping. What a pity what a pity! No arrangements had been made no police officers placed on duty and the whole house had been inundated by the rabble mob. We came too late.
The President, after having been literally nearly pressed to death and almost suffocated and torn to pieces by the people in their eagerness to shake hands with Old Hickory, had retreated through the back way or south front and had escaped to his lodgings at Gadsby&#039;s.
Cut glass and china to the amount of several thousand dollars had been broken in the struggle to get the refreshments, punch and other articles had been carried out in tubs and buckets, but had it been in hogsheads it would have been insufficient, ice-creams, and cake and lemonade, for 20,000 people, for it is said that number were there, tho&#039; I think the number exaggerated.
Ladies fainted, men were seen with bloody noses and such a scene of confusion took place as is impossible to describe, - those who got in could not get out by the door again, but had to scramble out of windows. At one time, the President who had retreated and retreated until he was pressed against the wall, could only be secured by a number of gentleman forming around him and making a kind of barrier of their own bodies, and the pressure was so great that Col. Bomford who was one said that at one time he was afraid they should have been pushed down, or on the President. It was then the windows were thrown open, and the torrent found an outlet, which otherwise might have proved fatal.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Depending on how Obama&#039;s Stimulus goes, perhaps we&#039;ll see such royal &lt;a href=&quot;http://memory.loc.gov/pnp/cph/3a00000/3a05000/3a05500/3a05553r.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;scenes&lt;/a&gt; again...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Compared to <a href="http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/jacksoninauguration.htm" rel="nofollow">Frontier Andy Jackson&#8217;s inaugural welcome</a> of the Great Unwashed in 1829, Barack the New and (c&#8217;mon) even George the Ex&#8217;s polite drawing rooms look positively genteel.<br />
<a href="http://www.picturehistory.com/product/id/6606" rel="nofollow">Margaret Bayard Smith</a>, a Washington Whig socialite, reported on the invasion of the White House:<br />
<blockquote><i>&#8220;But what a scene did we witness! The Majesty of the People had disappeared, and a rabble, a mob, of boys, negros [sic], women, children, scrambling fighting, romping. What a pity what a pity! No arrangements had been made no police officers placed on duty and the whole house had been inundated by the rabble mob. We came too late.<br />
The President, after having been literally nearly pressed to death and almost suffocated and torn to pieces by the people in their eagerness to shake hands with Old Hickory, had retreated through the back way or south front and had escaped to his lodgings at Gadsby&#8217;s.<br />
Cut glass and china to the amount of several thousand dollars had been broken in the struggle to get the refreshments, punch and other articles had been carried out in tubs and buckets, but had it been in hogsheads it would have been insufficient, ice-creams, and cake and lemonade, for 20,000 people, for it is said that number were there, tho&#8217; I think the number exaggerated.<br />
Ladies fainted, men were seen with bloody noses and such a scene of confusion took place as is impossible to describe, &#8211; those who got in could not get out by the door again, but had to scramble out of windows. At one time, the President who had retreated and retreated until he was pressed against the wall, could only be secured by a number of gentleman forming around him and making a kind of barrier of their own bodies, and the pressure was so great that Col. Bomford who was one said that at one time he was afraid they should have been pushed down, or on the President. It was then the windows were thrown open, and the torrent found an outlet, which otherwise might have proved fatal.&#8221;</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Depending on how Obama&#8217;s Stimulus goes, perhaps we&#8217;ll see such royal <a href="http://memory.loc.gov/pnp/cph/3a00000/3a05000/3a05500/3a05553r.jpg" rel="nofollow">scenes</a> again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theothertexan</title>
		<link>http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/2009/01/social-positions/#comment-88211</link>
		<dc:creator>Theothertexan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bnn.weightshift.com/2009/01/social-positions/#comment-88211</guid>
		<description>To me, Laura looks part of the furniture.  Whereas Michelle looks like the occupant of the room.
Laura has been a passenger on this ride.  The official portrait reminds us that she started as a librarian.  Her delight in the book feels authentic.
I&#039;ll bet she&#039;s sat in that chair often seeking refuge in a book while things happened around her that she couldn&#039;t condone, but which her own concept of her role rendered her powerless to challenge.
These two are so ill at ease with one another because Laura can&#039;t imagine a world in which she could have behaved the way Michelle undoubtedly will.
I feel for Laura because I think there&#039;s more to her than meets the eye.  But I love Michelle because she embodies the qualities that have been hidden from the public eye for the past 8 years.
Like the furniture that so needs a change, Michelle is long overdue.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, Laura looks part of the furniture.  Whereas Michelle looks like the occupant of the room.<br />
Laura has been a passenger on this ride.  The official portrait reminds us that she started as a librarian.  Her delight in the book feels authentic.<br />
I&#8217;ll bet she&#8217;s sat in that chair often seeking refuge in a book while things happened around her that she couldn&#8217;t condone, but which her own concept of her role rendered her powerless to challenge.<br />
These two are so ill at ease with one another because Laura can&#8217;t imagine a world in which she could have behaved the way Michelle undoubtedly will.<br />
I feel for Laura because I think there&#8217;s more to her than meets the eye.  But I love Michelle because she embodies the qualities that have been hidden from the public eye for the past 8 years.<br />
Like the furniture that so needs a change, Michelle is long overdue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molly</title>
		<link>http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/2009/01/social-positions/#comment-88210</link>
		<dc:creator>Molly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bnn.weightshift.com/2009/01/social-positions/#comment-88210</guid>
		<description>On another website, PunditKitchen.com, I saw a &quot;re-captioned&quot; photo of Laura and Michelle. Laura&#039;s thought bubble was: &quot;I hope she takes this ugly chair&quot; and Michelle&#039;s thought bubble was: &quot;I hope she takes this ugly chair.&quot;
That is one ugly chair.
I agree with above comments that Laura seems to be ultra-private. I imagine if she has let you into her circle or allows you to see something beyond the &quot;company face&quot;, she would be an interesting person to know. Unfortunately, she has had the misfortune to be wedded to the worst President in history. Maybe his retirement will give us some extra space and time to re-assess her.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On another website, PunditKitchen.com, I saw a &#8220;re-captioned&#8221; photo of Laura and Michelle. Laura&#8217;s thought bubble was: &#8220;I hope she takes this ugly chair&#8221; and Michelle&#8217;s thought bubble was: &#8220;I hope she takes this ugly chair.&#8221;<br />
That is one ugly chair.<br />
I agree with above comments that Laura seems to be ultra-private. I imagine if she has let you into her circle or allows you to see something beyond the &#8220;company face&#8221;, she would be an interesting person to know. Unfortunately, she has had the misfortune to be wedded to the worst President in history. Maybe his retirement will give us some extra space and time to re-assess her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yg</title>
		<link>http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/2009/01/social-positions/#comment-88209</link>
		<dc:creator>yg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bnn.weightshift.com/2009/01/social-positions/#comment-88209</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ll admit to a hatred and contempt for bush, but i think it&#039;s mistake to conflate bush with laura. they&#039;re two separate people, not an interchangable unit.
i don&#039;t get what the objection is here. laura is to be sneered at because she sat in a big chair and posed for the camera? really??
in the same way i hope critics don&#039;t make meritless attacks against michelle because they disagree with barack&#039;s policies, i think laura should be afforded the same courtesy. but i can understand the temptation. i say this as a reformed sneer-er who used to fault laura for petty things.
it&#039;s fun to make assumptions from a photo, but is it backed up by evidence? one photo doesn&#039;t tell the entire story. what other proof is there that laura is an unegalitarian and inhospitable host who made michelle feel uncomfortable?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ll admit to a hatred and contempt for bush, but i think it&#8217;s mistake to conflate bush with laura. they&#8217;re two separate people, not an interchangable unit.<br />
i don&#8217;t get what the objection is here. laura is to be sneered at because she sat in a big chair and posed for the camera? really??<br />
in the same way i hope critics don&#8217;t make meritless attacks against michelle because they disagree with barack&#8217;s policies, i think laura should be afforded the same courtesy. but i can understand the temptation. i say this as a reformed sneer-er who used to fault laura for petty things.<br />
it&#8217;s fun to make assumptions from a photo, but is it backed up by evidence? one photo doesn&#8217;t tell the entire story. what other proof is there that laura is an unegalitarian and inhospitable host who made michelle feel uncomfortable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen H.</title>
		<link>http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/2009/01/social-positions/#comment-88208</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bnn.weightshift.com/2009/01/social-positions/#comment-88208</guid>
		<description>ursula, it occurred to me while writing a longer piece that the poses were very similar. Good eyes. My thought was that Laura has a very limited personal vocabulary.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ursula, it occurred to me while writing a longer piece that the poses were very similar. Good eyes. My thought was that Laura has a very limited personal vocabulary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yg</title>
		<link>http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/2009/01/social-positions/#comment-88207</link>
		<dc:creator>yg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bnn.weightshift.com/2009/01/social-positions/#comment-88207</guid>
		<description>poor charles, heir to the throne and yet he couldn&#039;t compete against diana.
re laura bush, from a piece examining the role of first ladies:
&lt;i&gt;The same day Obama was elected, news broke that Laura Bush had gone public with her conflict with Vice President Cheney on a pending landmark ocean preservation act -- though understandably the main story was Obama&#039;s election. Still, after the post-election glow the holidays, there was a January 7 announcement that the President sided with her and enacted it. The enactment made the green news but as for the First Lady&#039;s role in it? Barely a blink in the blogs. It didn&#039;t fit the conventional narrative.&lt;/i&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>poor charles, heir to the throne and yet he couldn&#8217;t compete against diana.<br />
re laura bush, from a piece examining the role of first ladies:<br />
<i>The same day Obama was elected, news broke that Laura Bush had gone public with her conflict with Vice President Cheney on a pending landmark ocean preservation act &#8212; though understandably the main story was Obama&#8217;s election. Still, after the post-election glow the holidays, there was a January 7 announcement that the President sided with her and enacted it. The enactment made the green news but as for the First Lady&#8217;s role in it? Barely a blink in the blogs. It didn&#8217;t fit the conventional narrative.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackmormon</title>
		<link>http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/2009/01/social-positions/#comment-88206</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackmormon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bnn.weightshift.com/2009/01/social-positions/#comment-88206</guid>
		<description>Laura Bush&#039;s armchair is &lt;i&gt;gigantic&lt;/i&gt;. I almost wonder whether it&#039;s entirely appropriate for a receiving area---it&#039;s essentially a fancily upholstered Laz-E Boy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura Bush&#8217;s armchair is <i>gigantic</i>. I almost wonder whether it&#8217;s entirely appropriate for a receiving area&#8212;it&#8217;s essentially a fancily upholstered Laz-E Boy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g</title>
		<link>http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/2009/01/social-positions/#comment-88205</link>
		<dc:creator>g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bnn.weightshift.com/2009/01/social-positions/#comment-88205</guid>
		<description>I think it might be reading too much into the Laura meets Michelle photo to say that Michelle looks uncomfortable. Laura is definitely posing for the camera, but Michelle seems pretty poised and at ease.
I think Laura Bush is a profoundly private person, she was probably quite uncomfortable in the role of hostess.
One of George H. W.&#039;s finest qualities has always been his manners. The son - not so much.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it might be reading too much into the Laura meets Michelle photo to say that Michelle looks uncomfortable. Laura is definitely posing for the camera, but Michelle seems pretty poised and at ease.<br />
I think Laura Bush is a profoundly private person, she was probably quite uncomfortable in the role of hostess.<br />
One of George H. W.&#8217;s finest qualities has always been his manners. The son &#8211; not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ursula L</title>
		<link>http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/2009/01/social-positions/#comment-88204</link>
		<dc:creator>Ursula L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bnn.weightshift.com/2009/01/social-positions/#comment-88204</guid>
		<description>I find it interesting that Laura Bush is seated/posed in almost the exact same way in both the picture with Michelle Obama and in the official portrait.  While the other pictures are more clearly taken while the First Lady is entertaining, with the subjects looking at each other, gesturing, drinking coffee and seemingly unaware of the camera, Laura Bush seems to be there because she must be - she&#039;s got to have a picture showing she entertained Michelle Obama, and there the picture is.
The others are entertaining guests, Laura Bush is having a picture taken.  It is the social equivalent of the comparison of the pictures of W and Obama &quot;working&quot; in the Oval office.  Obama is working, Shrub is having a picture taken as a symbol of his work.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting that Laura Bush is seated/posed in almost the exact same way in both the picture with Michelle Obama and in the official portrait.  While the other pictures are more clearly taken while the First Lady is entertaining, with the subjects looking at each other, gesturing, drinking coffee and seemingly unaware of the camera, Laura Bush seems to be there because she must be &#8211; she&#8217;s got to have a picture showing she entertained Michelle Obama, and there the picture is.<br />
The others are entertaining guests, Laura Bush is having a picture taken.  It is the social equivalent of the comparison of the pictures of W and Obama &#8220;working&#8221; in the Oval office.  Obama is working, Shrub is having a picture taken as a symbol of his work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellie</title>
		<link>http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/2009/01/social-positions/#comment-88203</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bnn.weightshift.com/2009/01/social-positions/#comment-88203</guid>
		<description>This is a very interesting set of photos and reflections.
I have an old-fashioned &quot;polite society&quot; Southern upbringing and I can remember it being DRILLED into me as a child that the first rule of hospitality is to do everything possible to put one&#039;s guest at ease.
Barbara Bush undoubtedly had a similar upbringing (although it was not Southern. It was, however, according to the standards and expectations of &quot;polite society&quot;.) But she didn&#039;t seem know know how to pass it on to her children - or, maybe, to care. (And I&#039;m not so sure Laura was particularly well brought up.  Just sayin&#039;.)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very interesting set of photos and reflections.<br />
I have an old-fashioned &#8220;polite society&#8221; Southern upbringing and I can remember it being DRILLED into me as a child that the first rule of hospitality is to do everything possible to put one&#8217;s guest at ease.<br />
Barbara Bush undoubtedly had a similar upbringing (although it was not Southern. It was, however, according to the standards and expectations of &#8220;polite society&#8221;.) But she didn&#8217;t seem know know how to pass it on to her children &#8211; or, maybe, to care. (And I&#8217;m not so sure Laura was particularly well brought up.  Just sayin&#8217;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

