BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Saturday, February 04, 2012

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement



January 30, 2009

(Oops, Sorry. I Must Be In The Wrong Place. I Thought This Was The Trailer For The New “Miami Vice” Movie.)

(Note: In honor of Michael Steele being elected new chairman of the Republican party, BNN takes the occasion to republish this post from March 26, 2006, which, listening to Steele address party faithful, still seems all too applicable.)

Steele vice.jpg

Okay, now I’m convinced the NYT bleeds elephant red.

Even if today’s NYT Mag profile of Maryland’s GOP Senatorial candidate (“Why Is Michael Steele a Republican Candidate?”) isn’t completely flattering, why does it feel like we are somehow supposed to be fascinated with this guy? Why, especially given these shots, should it seem like the coolest, most obvious choice for the job is Maryland’s Michael Steele?

So Steele’s friend warns him not to become an “outreach” pawn (which the author of the article, Michael Sokolove, explains is an African-American used by Republicans to expand their voting pool). Steele claims he’s not, but the Lieutenant Governor (whose job is largely ceremonial) can barely explain what it is he stands for. Also lacking in political instinct, Steele essentially confirms that he got roped into running by Rove, Bush and Cheney.

But where the article really gets strange is with these visuals.

The shots look more like promo pics for a fast-paced, high contrast, high attitude action thriller. (As if Quentin Tarantino did the remake of Miami Vice.) Look, there’s Detective Michael (“Man Of”) Steele now! He’s tall. He’s bad. He’s on the move. He’s always smack in the middle. He can crack a case just by crossing his arms.

Steele leopard.jpg

If the lead shot would be great for an opening sequence, the second one would be a great set-up scene. I mean, this has plot written all over it. And atmosphere? Just check out that saturated blue sky; those leopard spots; the walrus-like mustache, white suit and sun glasses; and the local mayor with the shimmery tie and that stoic “been a regular on this show since before you were born” look to him.

But I’m not just being fanciful here. It’s one thing to visually pitch this charming, yet inexperienced and out-of-touch guy in cinematic terms. It’s completely another to instill his rudimentary campaign with a hint of the inevitable.

(images: Justin Steele (any relation???) for The New York Times. March 21, 2006. nyt.com. Caption for image 2: With J. Michael Downes, New Carrollton’s city administrative officer, Mayor Hanko and Audrey Scott, Maryland’s secretary of planning.)

« Prev

Next »

  • Karen H.

    I can’t think of a photo better than the second one to illustrate the GOP’s attrition problems.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/6p010536f3e344970c creditking

    Will former Lt. Gov. Steele follow in the model of the DNC’s Howard Dean and be a leader in “remaking” the GOP to reach out beyond its core? Or do we just have some theatrics going on here, to pick up on the cinematic theme. I can see the trailer now: “In a world where traditional values have gone astray, only a man whose name is Steele can give the shaft to those who seek to destroy the culture.” And with respect, cue Issac Hayes, cue Don LaFontaine. -30-

  • Harold Pomeroy

    I wonder what the top picture would look like if it weren’t distorted. The lens, or editing, or something, changed the depth of the elements. The changes make the doors look a lot longer. If you compare the length of the doors to the width of the opening, they look extra wide in a standard width opening. (Yes, I do make a living building doors.) Editing probably changed the size of a lot of other elements, and how they relate to each other.
    This isn’t to prove a point or intent, I don’t know anything about Michael Steele.

  • http://blogs.salon.com/0003935/theRanticore Julia Grey

    The thing that struck me about the second photo is that Steele is so starkly limned against that blue, blue sky that he almost looks like one of those cardboard cutouts of celebrities that you can stand next to to get your picture taken. So he appears at first glance to be a simulacrum literally stuck into the background of the scene.

  • http://www.thenewswriter.com newswriter

    And so he does, Julia. That got a chuckle from me. Steele is much better than his African-American colleague Ken Blackwell, but “much better” in the GOP is a relative term. I think the RNC had to pick Steele to counter their increasingly out of touch image. Will it work? Only if they can put the Palinites back in the box and shut Supreme Leader Limbaugh up. I’m not holding my breath.

  • http://unclegerald.blogspot.com Jerry Holtaway

    Could this be the case of a journalist hoping that down the road he’ll have the retro-scoop of “even when nobody knew this guy, I knew he’d be great”

  • http://kalimao.blogspot.com/ thepoliticalcat

    Perhaps as a person of a tinted persuasion, I have a different take on that second scene. It looks as if everyone in that picture is looking at the old white guy with the walrus moustache, and Steele looks kind of in the background, as if no one wants to acknowledge him or deal with him and he’s waiting for a chance to be noticed.

  • cenoxo

    …why does it feel like we are somehow supposed to be fascinated with this guy? Why, especially given these shots, should it seem like the coolest, most obvious choice for the job… The shots look more like promo pics for a fast-paced, high contrast, high attitude action thriller… He’s tall. He’s bad. He’s on the move. He’s always smack in the middle. He can crack a case just by crossing his arms.
    Or by raising them. He is the Man now, baby…

    …but we’ve seen this flick before.
    Wasn’t it called The Usual Suspects?

  • chrisanthemama

    In the first photo, the guy to Steele’s right looks JUST like Bernie Madoff.

  • Molly

    cenoxo, Barack is HAWT! Steele… not so much.

  • http://www.victorfitzsimons.net Victor F

    That second photo is srange to me. It’s dynamic, of course. The sight lines of all the people in the photo make almost a star shape. But, what the hell are they actually doing? Nobody seems to have their mouth open and talking. Nobody is gesturing, aside from Steele who has his arms impassively folded in front of him. Maybe Mr. Walrus Stache is saying something but he could just be breathing out of his mouth. Anyway, I see a real dynamic photograph with nothing happening in it. The caption doesn’t give me much of a clue, either. And that’s today’s GOP: trying to make something static and immobile look dynamic and new.

  • http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0192335/plotsummary yg

    the shot of steele busting through the door reminded me of the beastie boys song sabotage.