BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Monday, February 13, 2012

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement



January 9, 2009

Delivering For The Children

pelosi-1st-day 08.jpg

Opening day of Congress following 06 mid-term election. Democrats retake majority, elect first woman Speaker.

Pelosi Sworn In 09.JPG  

Opening day of Congress following ‘08 presidential election.

Democrats expand majority, elect Democratic president, re-elect Speaker.

In comparing these two opening day images, it seems necessary to mention that the first session also doubles as a family day open house. As well, Nancy Pelosi’s ‘06 inspiration of creating a Democratic photo op with member’s children might make for a nice tradition (if, certainly, a sweet photograph).

On the other hand, however, given the fact that Nancy and the Democrats were so ineffectual over the past two years, what occurs to me about setting up the same scene — these children representing Nancy’s compassion, on the part of the party, to deliver for the youngest generation — is that it can also convey a sense of “same old, same old.”

In the most obvious difference, of course (beyond the additional row of children– for the larger majority?), Nancy is swearing an oath as opposed to hefting an oversized mallet, so maybe there really is different symbolism there. (Although, doesn’t that just remind how much the Democratic leadership over the past session failed to demonstrate almost any aggressiveness in standing up to the minority and the Bush administration and never did bring the hammer down?)

Anyway, the children (several of them, especially just to the right of Pelosi, back for a second appearance) are two years older now. My hope, in light of their innocence, is that there’s a lot more to show for their future before they visit the Hill again.

(image 1: Stephen Crowley/The New York Times. Washington. January 5, 2007. image 2: Richard Perry/The New York Times. January 8, 2009)

  • http://profile.typepad.com/6p010536b2fa33970c/ Lightkeeper

    In the first pic Pelosi’s smile seems genuine; in the second one it seems frozen in place, and the hand seems more emphatic – more heavy – than the gavel.

  • jtfromBC

    Pelosi appears somewhat subdued this time around.

  • Kevin

    It seems a little odd, perhaps ironic, that in the second pic there is an absence of black children (in the smaller group I see three children).

  • JayDenver

    I keep returning to the girl with her hands clasped over the chair in the bottom right of the photo…her expression is wonderful. Skepticism? Boredom?
    Kevin@3:23 — And the black children in the first photo are at the margins.
    Kids as props? I thought we had enough of that during the campaign. Time to get serious, enough with the cutesy photo ops. The Democrats have two years to get this right or we can expect the deluge.

  • http://wonderworldofbooks.blogspot.com/ Books Alive

    Speaker Pelosi WAS jubilant after the 2006 elections – becoming the first female Speaker is quite an achievement, so I’m not surprised that she showed her feelings. She is the mother of five and grandmother of seven, and being surrounded by her colleagues’ children and grandchildren is no doubt quite natural for her.
    As far as there being no black children in the 2009 photo, maybe the Black Caucus members were holding a meeting that they considered more important than a photo op. In the 2007 photo with the two minority children at the edges, hanging back may be a matter of social conditioning. How many “pushy” blacks actually get elected?
    In the case of Roland Burris, for example, Chris Matthews gave his first-ever Hardball award to the Illinois senate nominee for stepping up to claim the seat to which he’d been appointed. Matthews commends Burris for his refusal to accept being brushed off by the Senate leadership.

  • Julie L

    Given how completely incompetent the Dems have been the last 2 years, all I can say is “The Children are still in charge.” (this, from someone who is so relieved that Obama was elected, thinking “the Adults are back in charge.”)

  • cenoxo

    Her name is Legend:

    At last the people in a body
    To the Town Hall came flocking:
    “‘Tis clear,” cried they, “our Mayor’s a noddy;
    And as for our Corporation — shocking
    To think we buy gowns lined with ermine
    For dolts that can’t or won’t determine
    What’s best to rid us of our vermin!
    You hope, because you’re old and obese,
    To find in the furry civic robe ease?
    Rouse up, sirs! Give your brains a racking
    To find the remedy we’re lacking,
    Or, sure as fate, we’ll send you packing!”

    Nice mallet, but who comes first — the rats or the children?

  • http://wonderworldofbooks.blogspot.com/ Books Alive

    cenoxo: the rats!!!
    Abramoff, Cunningham, Foggo, et al., then on into the roll of elected officials who fleeced the taxpayers? I say it’s time to keep up the pressure and make sure that the mallet strikes. I’d like to have the Alabama governor’s case made front-burner, too, because Rove is implicated there.

  • Anonymous

    Delivering for the children? Yes. Since 1991, like this.
    http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=29685

  • yg

    she’s getting ready to finally pass the s-chip bill that’s been twice vetoed.
    why no word about the role of republican obstruction? it’s not her fault they’ve been blocking progress.