BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement



September 30, 2008

Cheney’s Head (Or: Looking At It From The Goldman Sachs Side)

Wh Economic Meeting

Despite the anxieties — and outright anger — expressed during the Republicans’ nearly two-hour exchange with Cheney and the other White House officials, lawmakers remained respectful enough to give the vice president two standing ovations.

I was looking back again at the pics from last week’s White House economic peacock show.

Most of the images that went out on the newswires were taken from the ends of the table, focusing –obviously — on Bush’s side.  This Getty shot, which I found at the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, does offers a different orientation.  The tendency though is to read it vertically, top to bottom, still placing most weight on Bush’s side of the table.

It’s that disproportionate weighting, though, which led me back.  …You see, another picture that stuck in my mind last week was a newswire shot of Dick Cheney at the Capitol seeming to hightail it out of the building just before the bailout vote.  It was that shot which got me thinking about who has really been pulling the strings in the Administration, starting wars, poisoning the Justice Department, wishing ill on the polar bears, etc.  Even more, however, its been Cheney from day one who has been the Administration’s liaison with Congress, particularly the Republican caucus.

The quote above, by the way, came out of a Politico article last week describing Cheney’s attempt, last Tuesday, to push the bailout bill with Republican Congress members.  Apparently, they gave him an earful, one member describing the meeting as “a bloodbath” and “an unmitigated disaster.”  Still, however (Cheney having a brilliant ability to keep a low profile), the man managed to walk away with two standing ovations?

I think there is another way of looking at this picture which, true to this dying administration, says less about politics than it does about fealty.  That view simply involves reading the picture, and the center of power, starting from our side, with President Cheney holding court between former Goldman Sach CEO, Hank Paulson (left) and former Goldman Sachs executive Josh Bolton (right) who might as well be Dick’s Chief-of Staff rather than Bush’s. 

From this perspective — with McCain in particular seeming to look in Cheney’s direction — we get a much better picture of not just the true White House power structure, but also whose head should really be first on the chopping block for the country’s horrible demise.

(image: Tim Sloan/Getty.  September 25, 2008. White House in Washington, DC)

  • plebeianswillrevolt

    Odd, creepy photo. I’m not really sure what the point is here other than getting me in the mood for Halloween. Reminds me of the disgustingly compelling episodes of Donald Trump and The Apprentice, which was also first term Bush. A room full of posers focused on a horrid, pretensious bore. Why were we so enthralled with that junk back then? It actually did have something to do with Bush who was seen as coddled, nutured and elevated to power by well connected mentors. The Donald was offering to do the same for one of his cast of misfit young Republicans, “Omarosa, You’re fired!”
    Ps – Bag Jr. We are in a tight squeeze but I’m not really ready to sign on to “the country’s horrible demise” quite yet. That might come after 4 years of Palim McCain – still, lets fight on a little longer.

  • http://oldfashionedpatriot.blogspot.com/ George Johnston

    Goldman Sachs isn’t even in trouble. Why are they getting a bailout?

  • Angellight

    Great insight and article.
    Banks/companies that are Regulated are not experiencing any econimic crisis, just the investment banks/companies which are not regulated or de-regulated and have no oversight! “One of the regulations meant to keep insiders from driving down the prices of their own company’s stock so that they could sell short at will to make a quick million whenever they felt like it was called the “uptick rule”. The “uptick rule” is another one of the FDR Era regulations which the Heritage Foundations was talking about when they said that they wanted to roll this country back to the days of Herbert Hoover. They succeeded. The Bush administration got rid of this safeguard last year—with predictable results. The uptick rule is fairly simple. ”
    (And by the way, Sec. Paulson has a nickname only the insiders know of — Hanky Panky Paulson!)
    http://www.investopedia.com/terms/u/uptick...

  • bluinky

    “JUMP!”:Volcker

  • http://home.comcast.net/~sfs73/index.html MonsieurGonzo

    . . . !
    another fabulous grab, Michael. (i recommend that you re-post it in its slightly larger .jpg form, fwiw).
    Photographer Sloan’s vision=image is so profound a fresh perspective that I = the viewer experience it through mind’s eye as revelation.

  • http://www.rhubarbpie.typepad.com Megan

    What is all that space in the middle for? Such a big empty table and ONE person brought a pad of paper to work with? Why isn’t that table full of binders and papers and laptops?
    OK, in terms of the area of that picture:
    40% is windows and curtains, which is all colonade-like, so I’m going to say that the represents the structures and institutions.
    35% is empty table, where there should be information and work.
    25% is people, all of them in receptive postures, no one offering anything.
    This is such a static, receptive, passive presentation.
    Lest anyone think I’ve stopped harping on this: ONE woman in that picture.

  • jtfromBC

    George & Team A
    vs
    Dick & Team B
    in
    ‘Rock, Paper, Scissors’

  • odanobu

    after seeing this picture i am so angry. so this is what its all about. the press should be demanding the immediate resignation of Paulson and hounding Cheney. throw this vampire back into his coffin and drive a stake through his heart once and for all.