BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Monday, February 13, 2012

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement



January 7, 2008

Clinton: Ho Hum And Worse

Clinton-YawnWith the Clintons, it’s hard to tell how much the darkening visual coverage is illustrative — given the poll numbers and perceived momentum — or plain mean.

This image accompanied today’s NYT article: In New Hampshire, Bill Clinton Finds Less Spark.  (Link.)

Bubba is photographed with Jen Bella, who penned a positive article about Hillary  in The Conway Daily Sun.  She and her daughter, Veronica, must have been pretty surprised this morning to see that headline married to a yawn and a brief downward glance.

Much more clear-cut, however, is this example, which has been bothering me for a couple of days.

(Christian Hansen for The New York Times.  North Conway, New Hampshire.  January 2007. nytimes.com)

  • Cactus

    Perhaps everyone is tired of the Clintons (Mr/Mrs), including the NYT. This photo is an expression of same and, yeah, it’s mean.
    The photo The Bag referenced of Hillary, however, is remarkable. One thing that bothered me about Hillary has been her fixed expression and the immobility of her face, the set mouth. Now we are seeing a tired and discouraged Hillary. But in this expression and in her words earlier, lie the unmistakable hint of the expectation of privilege and the outrage at being so denied. I think it’s just that sense of privilege that people are voting against.

  • GPrimm

    As a former photojournalist, my 2 cents worth:
    With a campaign this long, all the boys on the bus begin to create narratives in their heads about the campaign (something to hang their hats on when they run out of ideas, which is often) and how any given photo op is going to fit into that narrative.
    This week’s narrative is “tired.”
    On the other hand, maybe the editor told the shooter that they were going to do a sidebar on the bone-crushing fatigue of a political campaign and that’s what the shooter delivered. The take got scrambled or an editor (art director, actually) working on a different story got handed the seconds from the sidebar shoot, and voila! Polaroid editorial.
    Just a guess. Who knows what editors think?