No other site reviews and critiques news images as well as publishes original photography — all in the name of helping you become a sharper “visual consumer.” Are you bombarded by powerful images from the world of news, culture and social media? Sign up for our “Week in Re-View” and let us help unpack them for you. Other sites read the words. We read the pictures.

Close
Archives About Staff BagNews is dedicated to visual politics, media literacy and the analysis of news images.
January 23, 2008

A Banner Year For Corporate Debate Sponsors?

Drexel-Walmart

Drexel-AstraBack in October, following the Democratic debate at Drexel University, I was doing my usual run through the pictures when I landed on a page at the Huffington Post “Off The Bus” project.

The entry featured a “behind the scenes” video by a young, indy media group called GroundReport.  As the young reporter, Rachel Sterne, moved from campaign and media operations outside the Main Building Auditorium to the debate setting inside, something caught my eye.

Behind Ms. Sterne, on the far wall of the media’s filing room, I noticed a banner for Walmart.  What then attracted my notice — while Ms. Sterne was interviewing Carl Cameron, the Chief Political Correspondent for FOX — was a large banner over his shoulder for $18 billion drug giant, Astra Zeneca.

At the time, I did a screen grab of the pharmaceutical banner, but sort of forgot about it.

What rekindled my interest, however, was the buzz on Monday over the coal industry’s sponsorship of at least three CNN debates.  If you missed it, the coal industry has created a front group called Americans for Balanced Energy Choices (ABEC) which has a $35 million ad budget in states with primaries and caucuses to snow the public on the idea of “clean coal.”

What is most disturbing, however, is the fact that, in those three debates — including the one Monday night in South Carolina, as well as the CNN/YouTube debates in Nevada and Florida — not one question was asked about global warming.

I know there are watchdogs, including Open Debates.org, which track corporate influence over the Commission for Public Debates (CPD), the organization that governs the debates once each party has selected a nominee.  In searching the web for information on corporate sponsorship of party debates, however, I couldn’t tell how these banners showed up, or how a deal like the one with ABEC came about.

So here are a few questions:  First, who is selling corporate sponsorship to the party’s presidential debates and what does it entail?  Second, what corporations (besides the media corporations themselves) have backed which debates, and what issues might have been left off of which as a result?  And third, but mostly: What is the point of the candidates sanctimoniously calling each other out on taking money from lobbyists, PACs and other corporate interests so long as big corporations can quietly buy a stake in the very forum and stage they happen to be pontificating on?

No Questions On Global Warming Asked At CNN’s Coal Industry-Sponsored Presidential Debates (ThinkProgress)

Americans for Balanced Energy Choices  Energy industry “clean coal” website

Corporate Sponsorship of the Commission for Public Debates (via Open Debate)

Behind The Scenes In Last Night’s Debate Spin Room: CNN and Fox Open Up On Debate Coverage Tactics (Ground Report video)

Astra Zeneca  (wikipedia)



(screen shots: Ground Report)

Comments Powered by Disqus

Refresh Archives

Random Notes