BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement



October 5, 2006

That’s My Dad

I’d like to welcome Dennis Dunleavy to BAGnewsNotes as a guest blogger.

Dennis is a Professor of Communications at Southern Oregon University with an expertise in visual journalism and digital media.  Prior to joining academia, he had a twenty-year career as a photojournalist and correspondent.

While my style is to take a more political or psychological approach to interpreting a photograph, Dennis’ interest has to do with the shifting media role of visual presentation and messaging, along with the social, cultural and moral questions that come into play.  Given these complementary interests, I believe Dennis’ involvement will enhance this site as a vital source for the understanding of  pictorial news and visual politics.  As well or better, I believe he shares the same good instinct for what’s interesting, and what’s happening between the point and the view, as does The BAG.

Flat-Daddy

(click for full size)

by Dennis Dunleavy

They’re called Flat Daddies and Mommies — life-size cardboard cutouts of soldiers serving overseas.

In an effort to ward off the pangs of loneliness, families of military personnel deployed to the Middle East have resorted to hauling around the likenesses of their loved ones. Flat Daddies and Mommies, usually poster-sized headshots mounted on foam board and supplied by National Guard units, have been seen at soccer games, weddings, and even wrapped in blankets on the couch watching television.

In the picture, the son smiles and looks to Flat Daddy the way sons do. It’s a tender, almost whimsical moment. And then reality sets in.

What does this picture mean if mommy gets lonely while Flat Daddy is away?

What does this picture mean if Flat Daddy never comes home?

The novelty of the Flat Daddy began shortly after the start of the Iraq conflict, but the trend has been catching on in recent weeks, especially with all the media attention.

During a war, photographs have always served as treasured reminders of those left on both sides of the front lines, but the latest fixation on families carrying life-size portable papas and mamas in the trunk strikes a tender, much more political nerve.

According to the White House, “Since September 11th, more than 243,000 members of the National Guard have been mobilized for various missions in the War on Terror.”

The real emotional cost of the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts on U.S. military personnel and their families can never be truthfully told by warm and fuzzy Flat Daddy feature stories found recently in the Boston Globe and The New York Times. The media, in typical fashion, is masking the reality and angst these families now face. In other words, the pictures and words turn tumult into triviality.

What gives this Flat Daddy picture news value is not relevancy in terms of the cost of war, but quirkiness and novelty.

What boils beneath the warm and fuzzy, feel-good, “I miss daddy or mommy” story is more alarming. The war is becoming trivialized.

Beneath the surface of a boy and his Flat Daddy is the reality that daddy exists in a liminal state. Flat Daddy is caught in the vice grip of human memory. Flat Daddy and his real-life double somewhere in the desert exist in an ominous position between ambiguity and indeterminacy — no news story can ever speak truth to this sort of power.

What appears at first a light-hearted picture of families coping with loss is in fact, a decisive and profound image of sadness and despair.

(hat tip: hbg)

(image: Linda Coan O’Kresik for The New York Times.  published September 30, 2006. nyt.com)

  • marysz

    Thanks for the great post, Dennis. These cardboard images might also have an ironic effect in terms of the families involved on a personal level, too. What if the kids come to prefer the cardboard cutouts to their real flesh and blood parents? We don’t know if this boy’s actual father would ever ride on the swing set with his son. Flat daddies can become fantasy objects for their families–they’re always there, never loose their tempers and don’t make any demands. What happens when a real parent, perhaps traumatized by the war, comes home and has to compete with their cutout? Their families have learned to function without them. The transition from non-demanding Flat Daddy back to emotionally complicated Real Daddy could be a tough one for military families.

  • weisseharre

    fundimentia

  • Neal

    Virtual people in a virtual age. What if flat daddy comes back looking exactly like the picture-no hands, no legs. Who will push his swing? Anyway,they are less than a comma in the big book of history..

  • D

    Great analysis! One crucial addition (that I have never seen commented upon in the media):
    These “Flat Daddies” are always in uniform. (camouflage/combat fatigues)
    How many Real Daddies wear their camos around the house….always?
    So, not only is real daddy replaced by a two-dimensional simulacrum–but this simulacrum is *exclusively* military.
    Instead of seeing their real dad, who might pulls a 9-5 at the office/warehouse, and only dons the combat gear one weekend a month, Flat Daddy is a full-time Warrior… not just a regular guy trying to pay the bills any way he can.
    I can understand, of course, why fathers posted in Iraq would want their families to see them as they are NOW–i.e., wholly taken over by their military role.
    But we need to recognize that these Flat Daddies are also a *militarization* of the HOME.
    (will this make for a less jarring re-integration into the family? Or will it make it worse–trap returning fathers into their uniforms in the minds of their children? I honestly have no idea.)

  • Jerry Holtaway

    Here’s an idea, let’s swap all the real Daddies and Mommies for Flat ones and see how long it takes for the price of oil to change!

  • Jerry Holtaway

    Sorry, I forgot to extend a warm welcome to Dennis as guest columnist – first time out suggests some ‘added value’ (with all due respect Michael!) for all us! Good luck.

  • Kerstin

    Flat Daddy is the perfect expression of a society intent on flattening all awareness and emotion with regard to the horrors of war. Flat Daddy is perpetually happy, non-violent, calm, with no trace of blood to be found on him here at home. Now imagine what an Iraqi Flat Daddy would look like.
    From an opinion editorial run in Al-Jazeerah by John Chuckman: “I discovered on the Internet that people in Iraq know this program, perhaps learning about it from the drawling chit-chat between laughter and machine-gun bursts at American check points. Iraqis apparently have started their own version, necessarily rather low-tech in view of the lack of electricity and running water in so many places. After allowing the sun to bake them for a reasonable time, the bodies of Iraqi men crushed by American tanks or flattened by 500-pound bombs are gently peeled from the pavement. They are lovingly brought to what remains of the family home and propped against a wall in the basement bomb shelter, an important family-gathering place in George Bush’s Iraq.”

  • D

    (oops, one more thought):
    Imagine, for second, that these Flat Daddies were pictured in their normal clothing. (whether suit & tie or carharts & flannel)
    How would it make the ENTIRE discourse about the war different?
    (I think it would shift the discourse from heroic, “soldiering on” rhetoric, to one of disruption or even potential loss…)
    And would the mass media (let’s face it, not the sharpest crayons in the box) be even able to handle the cognitive dissonance of a report about a soldier, which included an essential visua that depicted him as a civilian??! How would they try to negotiate that text/image contradiction?

  • mugatea

    Flat Daddy’s lack of legs in this photo is disturbing. To call a person at war ‘flat’ is so, I don’t know – dead-like? There have to be Flat Mommies too. Flat references regerding women are something I try to avoid. It’s a shame the Flat Daddies can’t do the fighting, think of how many they could ship to a location on one plane.
    Do they send a blow-up doll to the spouse?
    This photo, + the entire concept, makes me queasy.

  • readytoblowagasket

    Hey, can we order a Flat President and Cabinet?
    Welcome, Dennis!

  • jt from BC

    Hey Daddy why don’t you go and fight so I can get a cutout like Johnny ?

  • http://www.sumption.org Dan Sumption

    “What if flat daddy comes back looking exactly like the picture-no hands, no legs.”
    He’ll have to be put in a bowl to beg,
    Johnny I hardly knew yer.

  • http://www.sumption.org Dan Sumption

    “Hey, can we order a Flat President and Cabinet?”
    Try IKEA for the cabinet. The president you have is flat enough already.

  • KingElvis

    This is incredibly surreal. I had that disjointed feeling while reading it – that feeling that it was a put-on or some April Fool. I think I first felt this feeling of un-reality during the 2000 post election scrum.
    It’s like a parable – or a sophisticated satire maybe -something you’d expect to find in some political science fiction of Vonnegut or Orwell. The Iraq war has just jumped the shark. It was a farce to start with, and has seemed to devolve into a sick joke.
    The image is disturbing as hell since, as others said, it implies daddy might not have hands or legs.
    The nulmber of severely injured runs into the multiple tens of thousands right? Given sophisticated kevlar jackets and armored humvees, along with much better medivac and medical facilities, it’s no wonder ‘only’ 2900 have died.

  • http://www.dock.net/fuming_mucker/ Darryl Pearce

    simulacrum, humonculus, avatar, …doppelganger
    Some cultures prohibit the the depiction of human form.
    Meanwhile, our culture revels in it… and perhaps gets lost in the scintillating brilliance of pictures both still and motion. We get …distracted.
    Even the president–who says, “I know the images on your television screens are horrible”–can’t escape it.

  • http://www.woodka.com donna

    How about we send the cardboard cutouts to Iraq, and bring the people home?

  • http://molly.douthett.net momly

    Jesus’ General had a post about this about a month ago. I like his revision of the idea with the Commander in Chief.

  • http://www.keirneuringer.blogspot.com Keir

    Welcome, Dennis. Nice, enraging post.
    To take JT from BC’s spot on comment from a different angle. . .
    “Hey Johnny your daddy’s in the war too, why don’t you have a Flat Daddy like me?”
    This is really, really disgusting.

  • MonsieurGonzo

    incredibly surreal; disturbing as hell…
    perverse! hideously obscene. image fills me with such turmoil, anger and shame that i can not contain my disgust. insulting; not just sickening: sick.
    Expendable? not even: Disposable! Daddy without His Dignity!
    child abuse.
    a poster for the Cut & Run of American empathy.
    a Rumsfeld rubber-stamp on a Letter of Condolence.
    an Automated Death Cashier Machine saying, “Thank You.”
    => a wincing metaphor for Your Unknown Soldier.

  • Bolo

    This whole “flat daddy” idea makes me a little nauseous. It’s just so… wrong… on so many levels. I would seriously question the sanity and stability of anyone carrying one of these things around. It has that “sickness of the mind” feel to it.
    I know kids have imaginary friends and pretend that inanimate objects are actually thinking and intelligent beings (heck, we all do that from time to time). But replacing your father or mother with a cardboard cut-out and treating it as though it were the same is disgusting. They’re already intelligent to begin with.

  • Victor F

    I agree, wonderful analysis. I am truly scared for the emotional health of children born in times like these, and the idea that this child may only remember his father as a cardboard cutout if he never returns home fills me with despair. What reality are we running from, that people feel desperate enough to endow a piece of cardboard with a soul?
    A whole generation of people, and probably even more, will suffer the longer this war lasts.

  • http://ruinsofempire.blogspot.com/ Rafael

    I agree with all of the above, it is disturbing to say the least. Are parents nothing more that a ever smiling cutout for their children?
    Did anyone say Nineteen-Eighty-Four?

  • http://profile.typekey.com/JeanneMaria-Dolorosa/ sisterjmd

    This story is heartbreaking to me, as I lost my father only two years ago, when I was 28. It tore my world apart. I remember clinging to the only picture of my father I had, wrapping myself in one of his flannel shirts and feeling soooo lost.
    It breaks my heart to think that this child, and so many others will not get to have years with their Papas and Daddies (or Mommies and Mamas) because of this war. They will never get to have the relationship with their parents that so many of us take for granted.
    This story is why I abhor violence, fear, hatred and conflict and have dedicated my life to trying to bring more peace and love into the world. I don’t want others to feel the anguish, sorrow, loss, pain and utter despair I did when they are told that all they have left of thier fathers is a photo or a shirt.
    For those who are into that sort of thing, please, please, please, pray the rosary (or whatever it is you guys pray) for peace.
    Once again, thanks for a great story.

  • http://www.futurebird.com futurebird

    This little kid, playing believing is he an icon for the american people who still support this war?
    Many of you have made great points. Images like this make me wonder if we’ve all fallen down the rabbit hole.
    But, I guess these “fun” cut-outs make the whole thing seem more light and less scary. Nobody’s think they were disturbing if they were stand-ins for daddies on long business trips. These poor families are kidding themselves in to think it’s just a game. If in the same position I’d probably do the same.
    I hope no kid ends up getting stuck with the cut-out when no real dad comes home… but, I doubt we’ll be that luck.

  • http://solarray.blogspot.com gmoke

    Virtual parents and spouses for a virtual war, a war based upon cardboard lies and cheap deception.

  • Mad_nVT

    In our little town up in the hills we will have a memorial service on Sunday for a Flat Daddy who became a Dead Daddy.
    We’ll dedicate a granite bench that looks down at the river, just below the Falls where the Real Daddy used to fish.
    Mike left behind a wife and two little girls. His father says “I am so angry at George Bush. They threw away Michael’s life without thinking, without even knowing who he was.”

  • epistemology

    Can somebody make me a flat president? A substitute until we have a real one in this country?

  • http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~smith60 Chuck

    Man, oh man. I find photographs to be powerful tools (which is why I totally dig this site) — but this one literally took my breath away.
    It’s like looking at a freaking ghost. From the image alone, I thought it was representing the ghost of a father, dead from war, overlooking his son on a swing set. The cutout seems just enough higher in value than the rest of the photo that (and perhaps the camo jacket has something to do with it, too), but it’s less like you’re looking *at* flat daddy and more like you’re looking *through* him.
    What a striking and powerful shot. Thank you all for sharing.

  • PTate in MN

    Thanks for a very post, Dennis! I appreciate the insight that these images trivialize the sacrifices being made by these men and women.
    As I imagine the emotional void these images are meant to fill, I also think of all the photos we have analyzed on these threads of GWB pretending…walking in front of or with soldiers, firefighters, little black kids, screened crowds of admirers. We’re all just props to Bushco. So it seems fitting that even our soldiers have become cardboard figures.
    On a practical note, I wonder what happens when a flat daddy becomes soiled, sticky, tattered and bent from one too many swingset outings with ice cream? Does flesh&blood mommy put it out with the garbage? Burn it like a flag? And do they get a second, third, fourth image then?
    I don’t know about anyone else but disposing of a life size image of my husband would just creep me out.

  • ummabdulla

    Wow! I saw the post last night and didn’t have time to comment, and so many things have popped into my head since then, but I’ll try to be brief.
    Since this was the first I’ve heard of “Flat Daddies” and “Flat Mommies” (was someone at the National Guard involved in a Flat Stanley project?, I googled them to read more about it. The first article I read said:
    “He’s quietly in the background on family outings to the grocery store, to restaurants, camping, even on Mary’s most recent visit to her gynecologist…
    “The Holbrooks’ Flat Daddy has been to birthday parties, ballgames, school, the hairdresser, the babysitter’s with Logan, and to the funeral of Mary Holbrook’s mother.
    “When the family first got him, they propped him up in a chair at dinner.
    “‘We put plates in front of him the first few days,’ Holbrook said. ‘But he didn’t eat much.’”
    I wonder how the read daddy reacts to this.
    I’m trying to be sensitive to the needs of these families, and I can see where a photo might be comforting, but taking “him” to a gynecologist appointment and putting food in front of “him” seems very strange… it’s as if he’s become an idol. It reminds me of seeing trays and trays of fruits and other food set it all in front of statues of “gods” to rot – as if statues could eat or “gods” needed food.
    In the photo, it wasn’t immediately clear that the “Flat Daddy” was on the swing; it sort of looked like he was stuck in the grass, which makes him look sort of like a tombstone. He also made me think of something that Northern Virginians would use to pretend they had fellow commuters in the car so they could use the carpool lanes. Or those lifesize cutouts of Presidents they used to have around D.C. so tourists could take their picture with the “President”. (I had a great picture of me choking Ronald Reagan.)
    These cutouts could be a good idea for an anti-war protest. Sometimes they have rows and rows of shoes or combat boots to represent the service members who have died, but what if they had these cutouts? Or family pictures with the deceased cut out of the picture and a black hole left where he or she should be…
    If the country is going to take fathers, and especially mothers, and more especially, BOTH parents, away from their families, it should be for a fight that’s absolute necessary. In Iraq, they’re cannon fodder; they go into a neighborhood and snipers (increasingly sophisticated) fire at them or IEDs explode. But – to state the obvious – if they weren’t there, the snipers and IEDs wouldn’t be targeting them.
    (And welcome, Dennis.)

  • ummabdulla

    “I wonder how the read daddy reacts to this.
    That should be “real daddy”…

  • readytoblowagasket

    While I personally find Flat Daddies and Mommies thoroughly creepy, radically obscene, and profoundly disturbing, I also think the cutouts are entirely fitting and appropriate.
    Flat Daddies and Mommies are “fitting” in the sense that the families who ACCEPT Real Daddy’s fifth tour of “duty” in Iraq without protest must live in a state of complete denial and delusion in order to cope. So a cardboard surrogate makes perfect make-believe sense.
    Flat Daddies and Mommies are “appropriate” in the sense that they represent, in reality, what the military thinks of its servicemen and -women: that they *are* disposable, interchangeable, manufacturable — not flesh-and-blood human. Ironically, it’s the military’s only honest gesture to date.
    The Donald Rumsfeld-directed military has created a new class in the United States, one that exists *below* the working class: the military class, the disposable class. Since they aren’t human, they aren’t victims.

  • Donna

    Ok, well I am currently making posters of daddy’s and mommy’s and let me tell you, these kids that will receive these posters, were thrilled with the idea. And any of you who have not stood in a parking lot at 2:00 a.m. in the morning, and seen a daddy and child get peeled away from each other, so daddy can get in formation and march away, PER THE CONTRACT THAT HE SIGNED WITH THE GOVERNMENT, YOU PEOPLE ACT LIKE THESE SOLDIERS HAVE A CHOICE…HELLO….anyway, back to my experiences, until you have seen and heard this heartwrenching experience, don’t kid yourself about what these kids need. Why was a child in a parking lot at 2:00 a.m. in the morning, well let me tell you, its cause nothing was arranged properly and everyone hurried up just to wait, and this mentality comes down from the top of our administration. NO PLANNING. SO FAMILIES PREPARE TO SAY GOODBYE AND THEN WAIT AND WAIT AND WAIT…should those kids not been there? You are right and neither should their parents..so get involved, speak up and say something, not just pretend that these soldiers WANT to go where they are. Frankly, the whole thing makes me sick, THERE IS A FORCED DRAFT OF SORTS RIGHT NOW….its called a holdover….and if you don’t know what that means, then you need to spend your time researching that…I support our soldiers BUT not this war, oh yeah, MISSION ACCOMPLISHED….yeah well it certainly did not seem that way a few nights ago. Let’s not debate something you don’t know anything about and just have a knee jerk reaction and say its wrong….soldiers aren’t allowed to have a knee jerk reaction and shoot the crap out of someone…research the rules of engagement….trust me, the more you find out, the more mad you will become….please remember these little kids left behind. Thank you. Always praying.

  • weisseharre

    “Donna è mobil, qual piùma al vento, muta d’accento e di pensier, e di pensier, e di pensier!” (:

  • MonsieurGonzo

    Re: “YOU PEOPLE ACT LIKE THESE SOLDIERS HAVE A CHOICE”
    if you remain under the illusion that they do not, then all you’re doing is denying the existence of their humanity, while enabling the evil of their leaders.
    Men and Women don’t sell their souls when they sign up for Military Service (!)
    wow. hey, look ~ been there, done that ‘66~’72. back then we didn’t make posters of daddy’s and mommy’s. We made posters that said PEACE NOW, and… christ, what’s th euse……………………………………………………….

  • jt from BC

    Donna,
    1) signing a contract is a choice
    2) HUAW is historically correct and consistent for armies world wide;” hurry up and wait”
    3) yes there are formal rules of engagement, but combating insurgent or guerrilla warfare 24/7 with often inadequate training, rest or rotation time, lowered admission criteria, accelerated NCO or Officer promotion and other factors, produce a different set of survival rules not found in official documents. Think Rumsfeld Light and ” Wars of the 21 Century” & rewriting rules.
    4) “love the sin but hate the sinner”, or continue following orders until a personal moral imperative takes precedent over being “a good soldier”. There are also different rules of engagement, for instance in Israel a boy from Palestine is considered an adult at the age of twelve, in Fallujah there was not this official designation but the treatment was the same. I would be happy to expound further.

  • http://thirdeyepushpin.blogspot.com thirdeyepushpin

    The child is looking at the edge of the flat daddie it is just a line from the child’s perpective. Another line being fed to the next generation without depth or reflection.

  • Cactus

    Why don’t we send all the ‘flat daddies’ to Iraq and bring back all the real daddies. And mommies.
    And I second the idea that we should get a ‘flat president’ until we can elect a real president.

  • http://ruinsofempire.blogspot.com/ Rafael

    You have a flat president, one that spends his time describing his job instead of doing his job. You can’t get flatter than that.

  • limapup

    What if mommy or daddy does come home but not looking like the flat mommy or daddy? What if the real mommy or daddy is missing a face or arms, or legs or even half of the brain?

  • STL Christine

    Although I was opposed to the Iraq venture from the start, and have been an avid fan of the Bag since it’s inception, I think you’re lacking a bit of ground work on this one. Here in St. Louis, the elementary schools participated in a project last year based on a children’s book called, “Flat Stanley”. The children pasted photos of their heads onto bodies they drew and mailed them off to far flung friends or relatives to have their self portraits vicariously experience other families and communities. The recipient was asked to take the “flat child” with them throughout their daily routines for a week, and return the flat effigy with snapshots and a brief commentary to document their experience. I’m guessing that this “flat daddy” project is also connected to the Flat Stanley book project.

  • Donna

    Do any of you people even know anyone in the service? Let’s say a kid who lived in poverty and was promised an education, a career, etc. When someone enlists they give up their rights in this country and don’t you think for one minute that they don’t. I would suggest that you folks who think you have it all figured out, go out and adopt a soldier and let them tell you about the choice they made 4, 5, 6, years ago and how it affects them now.
    How their time is up and they are still serving and getting deployed. How their families are left behind, some two times already in a child’s short life of four years. Don’t tell me this is a choice! It might have been at one time, but it is not for those enlisted now.
    How about those rotations….let’s say for the next l7 months, and then in about 2008 the Army will go to 6 month rotations….how about serving over there in harm’s way for a year and then coming home for 6 months and then going back again for l7 months…until you have walked in their shoes, keep looking for a pair!
    I have seen it, live it, and dread it every waking moment and sleeping moment which are few and far between when a loved one is deployed. Again, keep looking for your boots…..This is not a debate about the possible psychological damage a cardboard cut out could do to a child….this is about giving them something at home while they wait AGAIN. If you missed, this read this post again…ie four year old with two years out of his life missing with a father abroad…
    For goodness sake, my 27 year old has a cut out of Canseco the baseball player and my 80 year old mother has one of George Strait and neither of them are harmed. And what if the guys and gals come home with no legs, at least they are out of the fricking military and home with someone who gives a crap about them. Again, go visit a military hospital, look up on line and find yourself an l8 year old who has been permanently changed by this war, and try to figure out where you were in America, making a difference in that kid’s life while he or she were pondering the military for a chance at the piece of the American Pie. I stand by my remarks, these kids today are caught up in a no win situation and all of us should stand behind them until they all come home. If we can’t pray in our own public schools, why in the hell are we in the middle of a religious struggle. Sadaam was caught, is on trial, end of story. And until it is the end to the story, I will continue my new endeavor to make the photo carry alongs for the kids of soldiers. Blessings.

  • jt from BC

    This is not a religious struggle.
    Praying or not praying in schools has something to do with your constitution I believe, the recent GWB intrusions on your civil liberties may be where you might want to focus some righteous anger.
    Saddam Hussein’s capture is irrelevant with regards to the insurgency, his trial at best is comedy at worst a farce.
    The victimization of children began in Iraq in 1991. Since Shock and Awe they have been filling the grave yards and hospitals in great numbers. Many of them live with Mommies and Daddies in a * Flat* position under the sand.

  • readytoblowagasket

    Donna said: “Again, go visit a military hospital, look up on line and find yourself an l8 year old who has been permanently changed by this war, and try to figure out where you were in America, making a difference in that kid’s life while he or she were pondering the military for a chance at the piece of the American Pie.”
    It’s called the American Dream. But regardless, both the dream and the pie are fictions. War, on the other hand, is real.
    The other guilt-driven fiction is that I owe the 18-year-old vet something extra simply because I am an American. I don’t. If the 18-year-old chose to kill people for a piece of the American “pie,” then he chose to serve himself and those currently in power, not me and not our country. Do some research yourself, Donna (start with the link below), and you’ll learn that the kid’s already got his “piece”; I don’t owe him *more than* I owe the homeless guy who sleeps in an overstuffed chair at my local Starbucks or the schoolchildren who line up on the sidewalk outside my apartment building every day. Since I have limited resources, I am going to focus my empathy on the homeless guy and the schoolchildren, who get fewer and fewer of my tax dollars the longer these fucked-up wars I oppose last and the fucked-up people who conduct and execute them remain in place.
    http://www.warresisters.org/piechart.htm

  • ummabdulla

    STL Christine, I also mentioned the Flat Stanley project, and since then I read somewhere that this did give someone the idea for “Flat Daddies” and “Flat Mommies”.
    But the idea behind Flat Stanley is very different; it comes from a story where Stanley was squashed, but since he was flat, he could visit people through the mail. Children send it to friends, relatives, or schools in other parts of the country or world, and they get some practice reading and writing, while also learning how people in other places live (and where those places are). It’s quite clear that this is not a real person; maybe some classes change it by using the students’ pictures, but when my niece sent me one about 10 years ago, he was drawn as a cartoon and was not life-size – and that’s the way it is on their official website. The whole concept is pretty different.

  • Donn

    Where in the hell did someone get the idea that because I support our troops that we support this war…and it is the American Pie, not the American Dream I was talking about…And for your information, my husband’s draft number in that other mistake was l6, so I have lived that as well. This is not a debate about the damn war, we all know that is wrong, it is about the kids who want something to carry around with them….how in the hell is that hurting any of you. As a matter of fact, I know a little five year old who has thrown up everyday since his daddy left, for the second time, let’s put our energy into bringing them home in one piece….and stop the bullshit about attacking one another and acting all up on politics….seriously look on line and I think you will find that most of these kids are very similar to someone in your own family, Unless you are a member of the White House Cabinet who wouldn’t dare have a child in harms’ way. So let’s all work together… if I knew how to get off this disgusting site, I would, I have way too much positive energy to be lectured about politics and how we are so stupid cause we support our soldiers…I hate this fricking war, it is stupid, it is ridiculous, it is A WASTE OF LIVES, IT IS A WASTE OF MONEY…and if I can make one little child smile while their parent is away doing what they HAVE TO DO NOW THAT THEY GOT THEMSELVES INTO THIS MESS, THEN THAT IS WHAT I WILL CONTINUE TO DO….Thank goodness for Freedom of Speech…let’s just try to stop the attack on our fellow citizens….and about those homeless people, you mean the ones I feed regularly that live beside the freeway in LA, or the ones that I serve in the soup kitchens….so a few of you who have such hatred in your heart for those of us who truly have a big heart, find something to do beside criticize little children who miss their parents….oh yeah, well before we get into that one….why not adopt a foreign child like three families I know, why not go to school and volunteer to help some underprivileged
    children succeed….there is enough going on in this country….without our spending zillions somewhere else in something that is none of our business. Now I am going to go tell my son in law goodnight, one of the last 30 nights I will have the chance to do that and I will go explain to my three year old grandson why he can’t go with Daddy…like I said, find yourself a soldier and support them, you will find that they eat breathe and sleep just like you!

  • ummabdulla

    I happened to see this photo in my newspaper. It was small and black-and-white, but I thought I recognized Flat Stanley. (It belongs to Schwarzenegger’s son.)

  • Bolo

    “Nobody’s think they were disturbing if they were stand-ins for daddies on long business trips”
    I would. I can understand a picture, but a cardboard cut-out that’s pretty much life size? That is invited to the dinner table or put on a swing to play with? Creepy.

  • Fatherless Children of War

    I have learned that your father passed in combat.
    My name is Neshia and I live in the Los Angeles area. I am writing a book about people who have lost their fathers in American wars.
    If you or someone you know has lost their father in any American war from 1941 to present, who wants to be interviewed about their feelings, and who lives within 100 miles of Los Angeles, can you put them in touch with me? If the person does not live in the Los Angeles area, that is okay because I can interview them over the telephone.
    The deadline is October 15, 2007.
    NeshiaBF@FatherlessChildrenOfWar.com
    Neshia