BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Sunday, February 12, 2012

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement



August 2, 2006

Jews On The Beach

Haifa-Beach

On Sunday, just before I heard about Qana, a reader wrote me about that day’s Reuters photo gallery.

The shots from Lebanon featured scenes of civilians injured or crying for loved ones, along with a picture of a sweet Lebanese school girl drinking from a tap.  The images from Israel, in contrast, featured Haifa bathers and soldiers peacefully sleeping (one in an orchard, the other on a tank), along with one pic of an Israeli convoy passing along a mountain highway.

Those who condemn Israel for it’s health or strength might not see anything curious at all in this shot.  In that case, the message might be that the state can maim and decimate, while for the Israeli, it’s no skin off his back.  (To which the photo editor might say, check the caption.  The beach in Haifa is mostly empty these days.)

But then, is Israel — perhaps, as a religious state — seen as more immoral for its aggression — and, therefore, more indifferent to the suffering of others?  I can’t recall Reuters — during the U.S. attack on Falloujah, for example — featuring Americans enjoying the surf in Miami, or lounging around the pool in the Green Zone.

——————

(Update 1pm:  You can choose to comment on the original post, or not.  I was thinking about deleting it, but I didn’t think that was fair to the commenters — and, perhaps, to the form.)

Every couple of months, I seem to need to step back and take a look at the “larger picture” of what I’m doing.  Because, as a blogger, you have to be “on it” every day, however, it can be awkward when that moment actually presents itself.

Excuse the public instrospection.  (And, please skip it, if you’re not into it.)  Still, I have a few things on my mind.  For instance,  I’m thinking that I can’t really blog (too much) about the Middle East.  I don’t know if it’s because my feelings and viewpoint diverge from my readership, or because I can’t find the proper objectivity.  Along those lines, I’ve also been wondering if The BAG, overall, is just too partisan.  I like reading Abu Aardvark, for instance, where Mark does a wonderful job focusing on “the data” and sidestepping own own opinions.

Finally, I worry about maintaining a consistently high level of quality at this pace.  Earlier this year, I was straining — both energy-wise and confidence-wise — to keep up.  (During that stretch, I made a big effort to locate and bring in some guest writers, but — for various reasons — the process didn’t really pan out.)  In the past few months, however, I’ve really been feeling really strong.

The tricky thing now, though, is that I’m in the process of making a big personal change.  As I mentioned a few posts ago, I’m moving (August 20th) to Spain for a sabbatical.  It’s been a big deal renting the house, closing my office, packing up everything, blah, blah, blah.  The bottom line is that I’ve got a lot of distractions, and — here and there, for the next month — I’m going to be unavoidably disrupted.

Usually, I keep this kind of business to myself.  I mention it, however, because the site has a strong community, a loyal following, and is evolving into a legitimate enterprise.  As such, I’m even more committed (as, I know, you are) to The BAG.  Which brings me back to this entry.

To be frank — this post was really “a push.”  In between the usual chaos, I spent yesterday looking at, and into Mel Gibson.  I started something regarding Castro.  I had three other ideas going relative to Lebanon.  …I hate excuses, so I’m not offering one.  I’m pleased with my image selection and my growing skill in the area of visual semiotics.  I also think I can manage a whole lot at one time — and still deliver.  But, I didn’t with this one.

  Basically, I want to say — both for my benefit and yours — that I might be a little off my game, at points, over the next few weeks.  Or I might miss a day, or, I might rely more on “Your Turns” (both of which, as you’ve already profusely reassured me, is fine).

So, what can I say?  I’m overly conscientious.  …Thanks for letting me get this off my chest.

(hat tip: jl)

(image: Eliana Aponte/Reuters.  July 29, 2006.  Caption: Two Israelis sit at an empty beach in the northern city of Haifa.)

  • ummabdulla

    There are only two of them, but they feel comfortable enough to sit at the beach that close to the border?
    Last week, the front page of the Daily Star had two photos next to each other. One was dead or injured Lebanese civilians, and the other was a very crowded beach in Tel Aviv the same day.
    “I can’t recall Reuters — during the U.S. attack on Falloujah, for example — featuring Americans enjoying the surf in Miami, or lounging around the pool in the Green Zone.”
    It’s not exactly the same, though. Israel is saying that they have to continue this war as a matter of self-defense, that its citizens are living in fear and vulnerable to attack, that it’s impossible that Israelis should have to be sitting in bomb shelters, etc. They try to make the situation of Israeli citizens the same as the situation of Lebanese civilians, and it’s just not the same. For one thing, the people that left the northern areas were perfectly safe in making their way down to places like Tel Aviv. (And beaches in Lebanon and even Syria have been damaged by a huge oil spill caused by an Israeli strike on a power plant.)

  • http://www.wreckingboy.com/madworld Nezua-Limón Xoloquinta-Jonez

    It’s not the same at all. In fact, I see so many variables that differ I think it’s a completely false analogy. Furthermore, I think there is a huge push out on the ‘Net, now, to make the state of Israel look better; it feels like a panicked reaction designed to counter the widespread perception that Israel is wrong. Seems Israel is losing one of the main things she’s had going for her—that Olde Tyme Persecuted Image. Hard to be “poor us” when you are the stronger, the aggressor, and the unhindered killer of children. But there’s an easy way to stop that. And that is stop going after the “root” (children who will one day grow to be adults) of the “problem” (people you don’t want living near you/with you/trying to get their land back).
    Image:
    Two people relaxing on some beautiful geography, seeming to enjoy their environment. However, they do not look at anything but each other, unmindful to the tempest around them, the waves that tower over them. As if their narrow gaze weren’t enough, their eyes are also shielded.

  • anonymous

    This is really a bullshit post – you can’t find anything better to talk about?
    WHAT ABOUT CORRECTING YOUR LIES?
    What about correcting YOUR lies?
    ‘No Hezbollah Rockets
    Fired From Qana’
    By Dahr Jamail
    Inter Press Service
    8-1-6
    QANA (IPS) — Red Cross workers and residents of Qana, where Israeli bombing killed at least 60 civilians, have told IPS that no Hezbollah rockets were launched from the city before the Israeli air strike.
    The Israeli military has said it bombed the building in which several people had taken shelter, more than half of them children, because the Army had faced rocket fire from Qana. The Israeli military has said that Hezbollah was therefore responsible for the deaths.

  • margaret

    There is no equivalency between the military might (fighter jets, tanks, rockets) of Israel which has the support of American weaponry and the backing of our government and the Lebonese with scattered Hezbollah fighters using leftover rockets from Russia via Syria and/or Iran. This is not a war against even partners. It is a massacre, and it may have been instigated by the inferior force, Hezbollah, but the result is a disaster for the innocent Lebonese.

  • limapup

    Let us not forget that the rest of the world is seeing Israel as an extension of the US. Beach bums in Haifa, beach bums in the Hamptons. No difference to the world.

  • Shaun

    I wonder whether the 20 or so ski resorts in Iran are closed, or the Black Sea beaches…probably not, despite the fact they’re orchestrating this war with Israel. You won’t see pictures of Syrians or Iranians relaxing though, that’s just not ‘ironic’ enough…
    People love to scoff at the notion of Jews enjoying themselves, as if it undermines all complaints about past and present attempts to annihilate them.
    limapup, here’s the difference between beach bums in Haifa and beach bums in the Hamptons:
    http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/07/22/emergency.draft.ap/index.html

  • Shaun

    Caspian Sea…

  • jt from BC

    Shaun > “despite the fact they’re orchestrating this war with Israel”. (ie Iran and Syria)
    Reviewing your recent comments, the following factual chronology of events may assist you in acquiring perspective as well as context. Your remarks to date have been unhelpful, glib, uninformed, repetitive and lack credibility. As we analyse the MSM here, in “framing” the issues in print and photographically, whether its the Caspian Sea or other oceans in which you may be flounding, I’m throwing this lifeline.
    ” Which raises a question: If journalists have been told by Israel for more than a year that a war was coming, why are they pretending that it all started on July 12? By truncating the cause-and-effect timelines of both the Gaza and Lebanon conflicts, editorial boards at major U.S. dailies gravely oversimplify the decidedly more complex nature of the facts on the ground”.
    Down the Memory Hole
    Israeli contribution to conflict is forgotten by leading papers http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2928

  • readytoblowagasket

    The BAG said: “I can’t recall Reuters — during the U.S. attack on Falloujah, for example — featuring Americans enjoying the surf in Miami, or lounging around the pool in the Green Zone.”
    I’m having trouble sorting out this post, and this point in particular. Since Reuters didn’t know about Fallujah while it was happening, they couldn’t have had the wherewithal to feature such contrasting photos of beach scenes. Finding photos of the U.S. military enjoying Saddam’s palace pool is not hard, however — a beautiful one is featured on Wikipedia:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Republican_palace_pool_baghdad_iraq.jpg
    The caption reads: “View of the rear of the Iraq Republican Palace detailing the pool area, in August, 2003. U.S. Marines in the right side of the photo can be seen enjoying the warm water amid temperatures approaching 120 degrees Fahrenheit.”
    While these men are taking a cool dip in 2003, prisoners at Abu Ghraib were being tortured, raped, and killed. I think the world opinion of Americans in Iraq is based on the atrocities we have committed, not the photos of us playing.
    Likewise, I don’t think this photo of Israelis on the beach is going to make a damn bit of difference on world opinion after seeing the pictures of dead bodies in Qana. World opinion is already fixed.
    Speaking of Fallujah, according to Lebanese president Emile Lahoud and eye witnesses, Israel has used white phosphorus in Lebanon. These reports gaining momentum in the progressive ’sphere, including Booman Tribune, Democratic Underground, and Democracy Now!
    http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2006/7/25/81627/7984
    http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364×1723146
    http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/07/25/1442242
    Human Rights Watch contends Israel has used cluster munitions in civilian zones, which is the same, essentially, as using them *on* civilians.
    http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/07/24/isrlpa13798.htm
    So again, I don’t think this photo of two people on the beach matters. The news, rumors, and other pictures are far more compelling.

  • Tracy

    Bag: It’s been my thought for some time that you should take at least one day off a week. Sundays would probably be good because you don’t get as much traffic then, anyway, and the readers who stop in on Sundays can just add to the thoughts on the preceeding week’s threads. Also, every Saturday you could have a “Your Turn” or, as you did once, have the readers link to pictures they find interesting. In other words, you could have a complete vacation on Sundays and a semi-vacation on Saturdays.

  • Stacia

    I dunno, I see where you were going with this. The beach is apparently close to areas where there’s been bombing, so it’s significant that there are still people who feel comfortable enough to lounge there. It gives the impression that Israelis are hanging out, unworried, and not in any danger, contrary to the official spin.
    But there’s always people who think nothing can happen to them and put themselves in harm’s way just to get a tan. So we shouldn’t read too much into this. There’s plenty of other photos that make this same point. And “Jews on the Beach” sounds like a Mel Brooks segment from “History of the World”.
    As for your readership, I have seen diverse opinions here. I can’t begin to assume what your opinion on the Middle East is because I don’t know what “majority” opinion your readers have that you’re opposite to. If that makes sense.

  • wire

    There’s a point where consideration of a view can reveal as much (or more) about the viewer than the content of the image. I think this image and it’s write-up is such I case. What is revealed is not national, ethnic, righteous, ideological or even partisan, but rather personal: the image itself is context free, containing only people on a beach that could be anywhere. The author has presented a dream image for consideration and annotated a geopoitcal news context. The coments are all responding diligently to the anntation, while leaving the image untouched.
    So what is the power of the image in its as presented? It is that ‘we’ on the shores of privilege, who sit comfortably in thoughful consideration of distant strife, idly wonder and fear that we may be overtaken by terror ourselves. We can’t help but suspect, if only subconciously, that we and the targets of violence may be the same; that the means of violence may overtake us without any connetion to the ends as we understand them. This is cognative dissonance as a function of being aware of “the terrible” yet only through visions. It’s just news, or is it? If you know of the terrible, are you morally compelled to intercede? If yes, how?
    The image submitted for our consideration says a lot about us as viewers, and nothing about the geopolitcal context in which it has been embedded. And the image contains (comprises) a perspective distortion typical of the telephoto lens which is quite analogous to the way photo journalism (telemetry) functions for its audience. Even when you are familiar with the depth compression of a long lens you still look at this beach picture with a sensation of alarm that the lounging couple is about to be crushed by a giant wave. Will they be innundated, or is just an illusion? And we have to wonder about the converse: will a sneaker wave take us?
    How close can the resort be to a battlefield?
    Do we know more of the suffering of those in Lebanon and Iraq than the pilots of the planes who bomb them.
    Are the readers of the Bag complicit in the suffering on the ground in Isreal and Lebanon, and Iraq and everywhere else that the might of industrial civilization is used punish the innocent masses to gain the conformance of a few.
    If we know, are we compelled to act? If so, how?
    The Bag needs to be addresing these questions but isn’t (maybe can’t). So the comflict appears and plays out in the Bag’s dreams.

  • http://www.keirneuringer.blogspot.com Keir

    Bag: regardless of how you choose to schedule your work here, please continue to have opinions. Otherwise you could find more profitable work (for your pockets, not for your soul) in what you always refer to as the MSM. We need more, not less, diversity; have an opinion. Let us challenge it. Hit us back. It’s called communication. I do not always agree with you, or even see the relevance of the images you choose. But I’m glad you’re doing what you’re doing, and I find this place useful, both for what you and many of your readers bring here.
    About the picture. I have a handful of friends who are safe but unhappy in Northern Israel right now. They are living under semi-voluntary marshall law. No beaches, no cafes, no summer. But the point they have all made to me is we did not want this. I’m not refering to the rockets coming their way; I mean the violence unleashed in their names. (US citizens, with their government committing atrocity after atrocity in Iraq and Afghanistan, can surely relate somehow, except that retaliation seems less immediate.) This is a photo of what they had all (foolishly?) planned for the summer, what they feel their government stole from them.
    It has been an extraordinarily hot summer in some parts of the world. Here, for example, where we have a (slightly more crowded) beach. I have personally felt the absurd disconnect between this conflict, my emotional engagement with it, and the time to relax this summer is affording me.

  • SEAS

    BAG: Like Stacia, I don’t know what your view of this war is, nor the view of the majority of your readers. I’m confused myself about what to think. The contrasting beach image I first thought of though was of the oil spill in Lebanon, which as I understand it Israel deliberately caused. [Wish I had a link, but I guess I'm not that technically savvy.] I’m biased, because I do environmental law for a living, but I think: give a man a fish and he eats for a day; teach a man to fish and he’ll eat for a lifetime; deliberately destroy the habitat on which those fish depend and you sow the seeds of decades of environmental catastrophe that is spreading far beyond Lebanon, but not toward Israel. Fighting terrorism justifies that?

  • http://www.wreckingboy.com/madworld Nezua-Limón Xoloquinta-Jonez

    wire, i beg to differ. i commented on the image, no?
    and i do not think this is a long lens. i think it is a normal lens. those waves are splashing over the rocks. and they do not appear to be about to crash over the people. i know what you mean about telephoto being used for compression of space…but i don’t really see it in this one. i see/feel the depth between them and the rocks. normal lens, i’d guess.
    and BAG:
    I think you are just too close to this situation. and when one is that close, it is best to admit it and proclaim it and speak the bias from the belly…or avoid the issue. my thoughts.

  • ty

    Dear Bag News,
    Take some time off, but dont let the blog die, its by far my favorite blog, and your analysis of photos and the discussions and comments are great great reading.
    Do you have a donation button somewhere? I would happily pay abit for enjoying your excellent insights!!! All the best to you, and thankyou.

  • Cactus

    ummabdulla made an interesting point, about the juxtaposition of photos compared to the fighting in Iraq. I saw a similar sequence on Reuters, since I’ve been watching them occasionally for about 2 weeks. My MSM input has been limited to Olberman/King because I generally can’t stand the rest of the blather. I don’t know the slant of Reuters, if any, but the photogs seem to be from all over. When I saw the photos, it just raised a question about editorializing. Was it just happenstance (the Reuters 24 hour loop recycles gradually) that the photos came in in that sequence. Or did the web editor choose the images with an ‘editorial’ eye.
    My impression, and that’s all it is, is that outside of the US, the sympathy lies on the side of the Lebanese (if not with Hezbollah). Within the US, it seems almost impossible to express a sympathy other than for Israel. Even though there is a lot of prejudice against the Jews here, it seems Arabs trump Jews for those who love to hate. The killing rampage in Seattle area and Mel’s drunken outburst just poured gasoline onto the fire.
    Those inside the US who express outrage at the deliberate destruction of Lebanon are attacked relentlessly. If it’s true that Israel planned this attack a year or more in advance, and if it’s true that the IDF purposely sent it’s military into Lebanon to be killed or captured (as xymphora posits), then it’s hard to have any sympathy for Israel. It’s also hard to believe Hezbollah started it, if it was planned a year ago. Unless, like our dear leader, the Israelis were just waiting for “something” to happen and they were ready to strike.
    Add to that the history of the Israeli military since ‘68 invading it’s neighbors with full force and screaming jets. The change, perhaps, is the availability and the immediacy of images all over the world. These images are coming from both sides and perhaps the world is saying it’s just not an equal fight. Sympathy always goes to the underdog.
    As a sidebar: How much was this encouraged by the US administration to take the focus off of the rapidly deteriorating situation in Iraq? One can barely hear mention of the killing in Iraq these days.

  • mugatea

    Moving is so hard on many levels. We’re having construction done on our house, it’s making us all feel unsettled. It’s challenging to be taken out of routines. In Spain there will be inspiration and energy that is not available at this time. Make sure to take advantage of that nap system they have over there. No Bag’n during nap time, amigo!
    It’s August, most journalism goes into holiday until the fall (mid-Sept/Oct) anyhow.
    I like the composition of the photo. Would make for a nice painting.

  • Shaun

    Dear BAG,
    don’t worry, I’m not going to leave you alone with these callow knee-jerks…
    Don’t apologize for your posts either–I’m sure you’re feeling despondant because even after you said, “those who condemn Israel for it’s health or strength might not see anything curious at all in this shot” a predictable series of comments playing dumb and ‘wondering’ why you’d chosen it appeared. International public opinion always has double standards vis-a-vis Israel and of course that affects the visual media coming out of the conflict…You’re right to point that out; don’t worry about what one contingent of your readers with simplistic anti-America/Israel views have come to expect: a mirror to validate themselves in from every post. You have integrity and a true critical perspective. I love The Bag. Keep up the good work!

  • jt from BC

    Cactus > “I don’t know the slant of Reuters”,
    I would suggest its “buyer beware” and its always advisable to check other sources if one has the time or interest.
    The news organization has been accused of showing a left-wing bias, mostly by right-wing sources, such the National Review and the Wall Street Journal’s editorial division. These accusations are sometimes prompted by the use of words such as ‘militants’ or ‘guerrillas’ instead “terrorists.” [4] Critics claim that Reuters’ avoidance of these words is selective [5], reflecting a larger bias against the United States [6], Israel [7], Jews [8], or Western values in general [9]. Some left-wing sources have responded by claiming Reuters’ bias is actually corporate and thus inherently pro-Western, not anti-Western
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuters

  • readytoblowagasket

    Shaun. Oy!

  • MSE

    I read this blog regularly, but have never commented. I live in the Bay Area and note that a series of “happy propaganda” images regarding Israel have just appeared all over San Francisco as the attack on Lebanon progresses. The images are entitled, “See the Real Israel” and are of bucolic scenery and a smiling, young blonde woman. The state of Israel, backed by billions of US dollars, is very good at propaganda and controlling it’s image. I’m relieved to know that the majority of Bagnewsnotes readers have not been taken in by Israel’s projected image of itself as a victim and a democracy – and perhaps as a zone of freedom and happiness despite the terror and havoc it wreaks upon it’s Palestinian or Lebanese neighbors.
    I’ve spent time in the Middle East – in Jordan, Palestine and in Israel. After having done so, it’s impossible to be fooled by the omnipresent, pro-Israel spin. Seconding an earlier commenter’s suggestion, I recommend the work of Dahr Jamail who is currently in Lebanon reporting: http://www.dahrjamailiraq.com/weblog/

  • transitory

    The photo is foreboding. What to make of that staff sticking up from those rocks busily battered by an angry wave?
    Remember the god Poseidon? A ruler in a partitioned world divided amongst brothers. When Poseidon was angered, he would strike at the earth with his trident causing all manner of natural disaster.
    In relation to the primitive whirling-wind landscape, the mannequin-like couple appear photoshopped in their oblivion.
    Spiritless, listless, hubristic modern mortals dangerously out of touch with forces to be respected and feared. Are they even aware there is no longer ground under their feet?

  • collette

    Dear Bag,
    You said:
    “Those who condemn Israel for it’s health or strength might not see anything curious at all in this shot.”
    Later, apparently in response to criticism, you added:
    “I’m thinking that I can’t really blog (too much) about the Middle East. I don’t know if it’s because my feelings and viewpoint diverge from my readership, or because I can’t find the proper objectivity.”
    I don’t think you have found the ‘proper objectivity’.
    When you wrote about people ‘who condemn the health and strength of Israel’, you wrote in subjective terms and diminished this horrible violence to the level of a sport. You could have been describing fans of an opposing football team. It let us know two things: that you too are caught up in the game, and that you are rooting for Team Israel.
    So you shouldn’t be suprised that you got a fanatic response. I think you should continue to expect it until you change the way you handle the topic.
    Best regards,
    Collette

  • collette

    PS: I beleive that Reuters *did* show a picture of President Bush playing a guitar while his citizens drowned in New Orleans.
    Different waterfront, just as much irony.

  • Pedro

    Dear BAG,
    I really enjoy reading your posts and your commentary and I salute the courage it takes voice oppinions — something that is rather lacking in the media today.
    I do, however, have a different take on the beach-photograph. When I first saw it I immediately tried to imagine what the equivalent would be like on the Lebanese/Palestinean side (don’t forget, there’s still a war in Gaza!). On the Lebanese side, the water would be very still, since about 80km of the coastline are covered in oil slick due to the bombing of a power plant in Beirut. Also, you’d probably see more military hardware in the water. In Gaza, this hardware would be lobbing artillery at the beach.
    What this picture represents, for me, irrespective of the reasons for this war, is leisure. And leisure, the Lebanese and the Palestineans do not have. The photograph, somehow as an anti-symbol, represents, for me, how the lives of these two people — Lebanese and Palestinean — are made to be hell.
    Cheers
    Pedro

  • margaret

    Bag:
    You aren’t responsible for the opinions of your readers, or how they react to pictures. This war in Israel/Lebanon is a volatile one for everyone, all around the world, for it represents the heart of the conflict between all the forces of the Middle East, the involvement of the EU and this country, with Russia and China sitting in the background, as part of the larger struggle for oil, which also plays a part. It is good to have a forum for the debate about what do to to solve the problem. The images are fodder for discussion, and they do shape our perceptions of what is happening, for better, or for worse. This is a valuable web site, and I respect it more than any other on the web, because it makes one think about what we see in the Media, and the reasons why chosen images bombard us, daily. We need to be more thoughtful about what we see and read, so that we can make better political choices. I don’t feel this site is partisan. It is open to the participation of all kinds of views.

  • Cactus

    Hey, guys, lighten up on The Bag. I was the one who sent the photos to him and my question, and it was a question, was why the difference in images from Israel and Lebanon. [Note: The Reuters loop is photos from the past 24 hours and is constantly changing. The day of these images there were, I think, about 4 images each of Israel and Lebanon. The only 'warlike' image of Israel was tanks crossing the border at sunset, very beautiful. It contrasted with photos of destruction and mayhem in Lebanon.] I am conflicted about the ongoing wars in the ME. But since I sent in these photos, I have become aware of quite a bit of Israeli backlash among the left media, including the blogosphere. And along with all that, there seems to be a persistent and obvious increase in ‘public relations’ efforts by those active in the Jewish community in this country. Perhaps we have been conditioned by long opposition to the war in Iraq and the appearance of Israeli aggression against another ME country. In the back of our minds must be the fact that the US is financing it and encouraging it. I don’t know which side The Bag is on, or even if he is. This is the first time in my memory I have been aware of anti-Israeli (not anti-Jewish) expressions in the left community. Personally, it is so sensitive that I have not had the courage to call any of my Jewish friends since July 12. As always, most of the comments here have been enlightening and compassionate. I think that’s why I felt safe enough to send that sequence to The Bag. Incidentally, there are some bloggers on the left that won’t even talk about this war. So, give The Bag some credit for at least trying.

  • Mad_nVT

    I too give BagMan credit for making these posts about Palestine/Israel/Lebanon.
    Very important that we see these photos and have discussion, because what is going on— from Gaza through Israel, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and even into India— is likely to erupt into far worse situations. It’s all connected, just like those nations are all connected in a crooked line.
    And it sure as hell is going to affect every one of us here in North America (and in Europe), and not for the better.
    The lovely people in the photo are at their leisure right now, while people in the nations around them are on fire. Figuratively speaking, those waves pounding on the breakwater are being thrown into greater turmoil by the actions of Israel. These irrational actions by Israel have increased their risk. Similarly, the irrationally stupid and incompetent actions of the Bush Administration have made the US less secure.
    I hear little support for Israeli actions, whether I talk to conservatives, liberals or rednecks— except that Jewish folks that I talk to will defend Israeli actions. Now that is an extremely interesting dynamic, but probably hard to discuss on a site such as this. BagMan may have alluded to this.
    BagMan: thanks for offering us your introspection, take a break when you need to, keep throwing up the photos, but be sure and keep the Middle East on the front burner.
    Isn’t the chaos in the Middle East the biggest threat to World Stability since World War II? We best be thinking and talking about it !!!

  • Mad_nVT

    BagMan, another comment:
    Don’t worry about partisanship, don’t worry about “Fair and Balanced”– just aim for the Truth. And that is a hard target, when we get so many lies out of the Bush Government, and so much dis-information from the Main Mush Media.
    Aim high, aim for the Truth.

  • Shaun

    Cactus, thanks.
    By the way, don’t know if any of you intellectuals still like dialectics but here’s an interesting article on anti-semitism I read today:
    http://www.workersliberty.org/node/6705/print

  • readytoblowagasket

    Shaun, this article finally makes me think you’ve never actually been discriminated against in your entire life. Because anyone who has been discriminated against doesn’t tend to engage in “dialectics” as much as activism.

  • Lighkeeper

    Shaun, wow that article is ridiculous. Dialectics my ass.
    After listing what he sees as anti-semitic quotes from various lefty publications, the author then admits that
    >>…I have falsified the quotes in one decisive respect: where “Zionist” or “Zionism” is mentioned, I have replaced these terms by “Jewish” and “Jewry”.< <
    This is so crudely deceptive it makes one wonder whether academia would be fine with replacing certain words with other more racially charged ones.
    No matter what anyone says, there is a difference between anti-semitism and anti-zionism. And to conflate the two is to mistake - or rather, deny - reality.
    >>The result of anyone who holds this anti-imperialist world view pouncing upon the Palestine-Israel conflict, apparently just one of many liberation struggles in the Third World, is that this structural closeness to anti-semitism becomes an affinity in terms of content. As a matter of necessity, the result must be the production of anti-semitic sterotypes.<<
    WTF? The structural closeness he refers to is superficially imposed and maintained by the MSM. And of course, jumping from anti-imperialism to anti-semitism further denies our ability to have a meaningful debate about this issue.
    Really, I am continually shocked at the level of discourse surrounding the Israel-Palestine debacle. Its as if everyone has collectively agreed to simply ignore reality and 60 years of brutal history – all in an attempt to pay respects to that most unrelenting war on what we like to call ‘terrorism’.

  • Shaun

    RTB, your dichotomy is false; the whole activist tradition is founded on and led by intellectuals who were often ‘discriminated’ against and manifest that experience through their thinking/writing/action (Fanon, Marcuse, Sub-Altern Studies, Critical-Theory, etc)…ironically, the whole point of the article I linked to is to show how ‘activism’ gets hijacked by broader historical forces…
    by the way, how can sitting around debating semiotics and semantics be considered ‘activism’ except in the broad context I just outlined? Broader point I’d like to make to you is this: having your heart in the right place is not good enough, although I commend you.
    Lightkeeper, thanks for even reading it…I’m sorry your not smitten with the phenomenological approach to German left-wing antisemitism–just thought I’d toss it out there as another way of thinking about these issues. Perhaps it is just coincidental that the Israel-Palestine conflict is the only one of dozens in the world everybody cares about…Regardless, here are a couple more articles, including the views of Europe’s lefty prophet, Slavoj Zizek, in case anybody else does find the anti-semitism vs anti-Israel question philosophically interesting…
    http://www.jcpa.org/phas/phas-19.htm
    http://www.lacan.com/milner.htm

  • Chris

    Is it possible that the image of the two people on the beach is showing how un-crowded the beaches are due to the threats from the north? Just a thought.
    Spot on comment regarding the state of the coastline in Lebanon-oil slicks abound.
    Regarding biased photo selections…I’ve noticed the NYT front page photos often feature Israeli soldiers. One photo showed several soldiers returning from the front on an armored vehicle displaying not only a captured Hezbollah flag but also a Lebanese national flag. They were all smiling and happy to be back from a hard day’s work. Just struck me odd that they would have the Lebanese flag and be so proud of it.
    There seem to be a lot of photos showing IDF soldiers that appear to be illustrating them as hard working professionals doing a tough job…almost requesting that we feel sorry for them since they work so hard.
    It’s all so strange. I’m afraid it’s impossible to please everyone with photo choices. On the one hand there is very little criticism of Israel happening within the US and it shows in the images we’re allowed to see. On the other hand images abound of the destruction wrought on Lebanon and these are getting more play in the rest of the world. It just confuses me when Al Jazeera, for instance, is lambasted for putting images of the death and destruction into people’s living rooms as if the information itself is harmful and/or untruthful.
    Emphasis is one thing but a complete lack of coverage vs. a deluge of images is a complex issue and some kind of balance is difficult to find.

  • PTate in MN

    I’m late to this discussion, but two things struck me in this picture. The first is the wave crashing over the rock barrier and the second is the two sunbathers. Both of these elements make me anxious–those two sunbathers are terribly exposed and about to be engulfed by those waves. Their bodies aren’t relaxed, but taut, as if they just sense their danger.
    So the picture can be construed two ways–as 1) Israelis fiddle while Lebanon burns; or 2) Israelis are exposed, naked, vulnerable and about to be washed under. Which interpretation one prefers no doubt depends on more than this image.

  • Cactus

    Re the flag. From old British dramas about their wars ca. 1800 something, one of the ‘gets’ was to capture the enemy’s flag, necessitating the enemy’s resurgent efforts to get it back. Seems a bit silly to this civilian, a bit like the tagging of the street gangs. Imaginary territory.
    As for the NYT images, I understand that there is a large contingent of Jews in NYC as there is in LA. That would slant the coverage of a paper depending upon subscriptions for existence, if they still do.
    It is strange in that always, in previous Israeli wars, it seemed everyone in this country was pro-Israel. Now I seem to see conflicting views and some partiality on the left towards Lebanon. Don’t think that happened before.

  • readytoblowagasket

    If The BAG didn’t seek to challenge *himself* or *be challenged,* he wouldn’t have called this post “Jews On The Beach.” Maybe the two people are, maybe they aren’t Jews; the photo caption calls them Israelis, but doesn’t identify their religious affiliation. And it’s not possible for us to positively identify their religion simply by *looking at them,* not to mention where in the world they are.
    Therefore, I don’t agree that this is an image loaded with “racist” overtones at all, as The BAG (“Those who condemn Israel for it’s health or strength might not see anything curious at all in this shot”) and Shaun (“People love to scoff at the notion of Jews enjoying themselves” — a ridiculous comment, btw) suggest. It’s a menacing scene, but it’s a generic picture with a generic caption, and I would suggest that the photographer was trying to capture the menace building in the not-so-distant darkened skies and exploding in the even closer seas. The reason I think the photographer is focusing on nature is because the people are static, extensions of their chairs, while their surroundings are roiling. More room in the picture frame (and therefore more weight, more importance) is given to the natural surroundings.
    Being conflicted about something is even more reason to explore it — or so therapists like to tell us — and yes, that’s an extremely uncomfortable process. Perhaps The BAG is not used to being in that position on the site, until he explores the topic of Israel.
    So like a good therapist, I’m going to push The BAG especially when he’s off his game. I trust he understands it’s part of the process.

  • Shaun

    What a naive reading: “Maybe the two people are, maybe they aren’t Jews; the photo caption calls them Israelis, but doesn’t identify their religious affiliation.” Wouldn’t that apply to nearly all pictures of Israelis (without obvious signs of religious affiliation like kippahs)? It doesn’t make any difference whether that guy is circumsized or not; if the picture says “Israelis” most people will assume that means Jewish Israelis. Don’t check your common sense at the door. Its a Jewish state in the middle of Arab/Muslim Middle-East–that’s an essential aspect of the conflict and how it’s portrayed in the media–no doubt the photographer understands that, so why can’t you?

  • http://essexmoonlight.blogspot.com/ Chris Black

    Yes, take some time off if you need to – you deserve it – but I’ll look forward to seeing you back in action again….
    …. and welcome to Europe.

  • The BAG

    I’d like to thank everyone for the insight, particularly about “the BAG process.” Having had a few days to think about it, I strongly agree with Mad_nVT that I should continue working the pics from the ME. My feeling is that it would be a gross act of avoidance not to. (Although — relative to Cactus’ point — I worry about whether I’m colluding with BushCo by focusing so much on the ME at the expense of what has/had been a consistent and intent focus on Iraq.)
    I also agree with Collette, however, that I have to find the proper objectivity. That doesn’t mean I have to be free of an opinion, or even a bias. It does mean, however, that I need to be clear (primarily with myself) about where I’m coming from.
    I appreciate Chris’ comment about the complexity of this issue. Although I’m not looking to cater to anyone, there’s a real learning curve here regarding how best to handle subject matter where The BAG audience is so widely and passionately split, and the political issues are so deeply layered and divergent.
    Also, I’m grateful to rtbg for her comment about conflict. She writes: Being conflicted about something is even more reason to explore it — or so therapists like to tell us — and yes, that’s an extremely uncomfortable process. Perhaps The BAG is not used to being in that position on the site, until he explores the topic of Israel. “Ready” has a good handle on me. At first, I was thrown by being thrown by this subject matter. As I come to see the mine field, however, I sort of relish the prospect of working through it.
    Finally, thanks for the general advise and encouragement. What I’m also learning is that I can and should be relying on you more. Lately, for example, more of you have been scouting images for me, sending (just fabulous) ideas for posts, and directing me to insightful material related to visual media. (The evidence of this is the growing number of those hat tips appearing at the bottom of my posts.) Let me say, this material has been invaluable to me — and takes an enormous amount of pressure off. You are so sharp, and so finely attuned to the process now, this increasing flow of material is starting to approximate a research and editorial arm. Even if I don’t respond to each and every message (although that’s my intention, and I mostly do), please keep it up!
    –Michael

  • mugatea

    Yo, Bag,
    hate to be rude.
    But I think rtbg
    is actually a dude.

  • Cactus

    Yo, mugatea
    He may be a she.
    The postings s/he does
    got you all abuzz;
    the thinking sensical,
    the thoughts logical.
    My, could it be
    a woman? No he?
    It’s Pat!

  • http://profile.typekey.com/SOS_independent/ SOS_independent

    I understand the point about the waves crashing, and the Israelis seemingly unaware, but… there are no storms looming. It is a sunny, beautiful, virtually cloudless day. This picture could be taken from anywhere, and that is the point. Israel could be anywhere, and they would still be going through the same thing. And every country’s citizens who can visit and enjoy the beach are going through the same thing Israel is going through right now, whether they know it or not. Anyone whose government is “defending themselves against terrorists,” or “attacking innocent civilians,” or anything Israel is “doing,” our citizens are enjoying the beach, and we are just like Israel.