BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Monday, February 13, 2012

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement



September 25, 2005

Wingnut Watch: On Michelle Malkin’s TV

Malkinscreencaps-1

Screencaps2-1

In the post-Katrina world, in which America seems (at least, temporarily) to have discovered racial and class disparity, it is instructive to recall the unending lectures (some would say, harassment) about "values" we’ve endured from the right wing.  (Yes, I’m referring to superior folks like inside trader and Schiavo malpractice artist, Dr. Bill Frist; ethics advisor and gaming enthusiast, Bill Bennett, the self-medicating Rush Limbaugh; and the junket loving, rule-bending master of funny money, Tom DeLay, among a growing list of others.)

Because the BAG mostly has eyes for the images, however, I wanted to look at a visual example.

Consider this item from Michelle Malkin’s blog about a week before Katrina struck.  In the entry, Malkin has a moral meltdown over an incident in Seattle in which two men are captured on video having beaten a U.S. soldier who was just back from Iraq.  Of course, the attack is senseless.  While retching over it, however, the one thing Malkin never mentions is that the assailants are black.

That’s because the images she posts do it for her — and more.

One of the assailants is wearing a white t-shirt with a red baseball
hat on backwards. Given the display of anger and defiance, I suggest
the photos carry inferences way beyond the incident reinforcing the
stereotype of young black men as predators. The clothing (aided by
indicting white digital arrows) also helps carry the message. With the baggy white shirt and the red baseball cap on backward, the colors, cap (which appears to be specifically
"called out" by the arrow) and the hip hop look would seem to
subconsciously remind good white people that they are under siege by
black gangsters.)

To highlight just how hypocritical (dare we say, racist?) this post was, seven days later I saw this image posted on YahooNews.

Marinekilled-1

It depicts still another (white) Iraqi veteran involved in a
violent assault. This attack occurred in Mexico after a group of
Marines were apparently accosted by a motorist outside a nightclub. In
this instance, the photograph documents the soldier attended to by his
friends, two of whom are apparently African-American.

Another sickening instance of an Iraqi vet being attacked.
Another case of the incident being visually documented. And, as opposed
to Seattle episode, this incident resulted in a fatality. Somehow,
however, I didn’t notice Ms. Malkin having anything to say about this picture.

(image 1& 2: KOMO TV. August 25, 2005.  Seattle. komotv.com.  image 3:  Raymundo Ruiz/AP. Aug. 31, 2005. Ciudad Juarez, Mexico.  YahooNews.)

  • Tracy

    Things are going south for the administration and they can’t seem to photo-op or spin their way out of the free-fall. I don’t know specifically how things went with Rita – except that the administration deployed at least twice the assets that were deployed during Katrina – but the administration has been in a Catch-22 because if they blew it a second time the inference is that they’re even stupider than we thought, and if they handled Rita correctly, the inference is that they flunked big-time during Katrina. Not only that, more and more it looks like a case of criminal neglect if not premeditated murder. NPR has posted parts of some tapes of conference calls between parish officials and a state emergency official in Baton Rouge. The dates on the NPR site don’t seem to gibe, but it seems clear that the “Listen” at the top of the page links to a pre-landfall conference, and that the five links at the side of the page are to post-landfall conversations or maybe conversations which took place just prior to landfall at a time when things were very hairy.
    The tapes were recorded by Emergency Manager Walter Maestri from Jefferson Parish. In the tapes, someone, I guess Maestri, is telling the man in Baton Rouge that what FEMA promised, and what Maestri repeatedly asked for subsequently, has not arrived. In one of the tapes he complains that a FEMA rep is bivouacked next door to him with 40-50 out-of-state firefighters but will not allow the firefighters to be deployed because they are “FEMA assets.” What the whole thing boils down to is that FEMA promised the locals that they would have MREs, generators, etc. but never came through. And, despite numerous specific requests, one of the locals notes in one tape, FEMA goes on T.V. and says they didn’t deploy because they weren’t asked by local officials. In another tape, the local states that he was still waiting for all the gas and diesel that FEMA promised and that if it had not been for “a ship” they would not have any fuel. “A ship” calls to mind the president of another parish, who said on Meet the Press that he had been offered fuel by the Coast Guard but that FEMA had blocked it. Of course, the above also recalls to mind Mayor Nagin’s anguished cry for help on the radio (“I need five hundred buses”) back when he was still frustrated and sleep-deprived. (Apparently, he’s now come to his senses and decided to re-water his Republican roots, cosy up with Bush, and blame Governor Blanco. The Republicans need Black sell-outs like never before.) Anyway, it’s obvious that the locals did plan but that their mistake was in including FEMA in their plans.
    But I digress. The administration is in trouble. The spin didn’t work, the counter-spin spin didn’t work, and the photo-ops didn’t work, for the left or the right. (Even Peggy Noonan’s mad at him.) Now, Americans are starting to notice Bush’s 2005 vacation in relation to his 2001 vacation, and the Katrina fiasco in relation to the Iraq fiasco, and the Katerina no-bid contracts in relation to the Iraq no-bid contracts, and on and so on. What to do? Go for thing that’s worked since Nixon – play the race card. So we’re back to where we started with this disaster of a disaster-relief mission: blame the victims – not “the victims,” I mean the welfare queens and the black thugs who want to rape your daughter. Malkin is just doing her part by calling attention to black-on-white violence while simultaneously emphasizing that the victims were soldiers. The idea being, I guess, that enemy of my friend is my enemy, and if my enemy hates soldiers the war must be just. Randi Roades of Air America Radio told her listeners: “You’re Bush’s enemy.” It sounded a little over the top to me until she explained that one conquers one’s enemy by dividing it. See, those people in New Orleans deserved to die.

  • Tracy

    Oops. Here’s the address to the NPR site:
    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4859329

  • PTate in MN

    The images that Malkin posted are visual archetypes of black thuggery. First the black man, his head thrown back, his arms clenched and raised. No doubts there. Then he is subdued, whew.
    The second picture is more complex and the race of those portrayed is less obvious. You can’t see what is going on, and it isn’t as iconic. Something bad has happened, I see blood. People are trying to help.
    I agree with you that Malkin’s moral meltdown had a lot to do with selective attention and the not so covert racism of the GOP. But I’m not surprised that she didn’t write about the second incident–it is more ambiguous. It would be very interesting to correlate “implicit racism” with judgments of the race of the men pictured in the second photo. I’d bet that Malkin didn’t see the helping men as African-American.

  • Wally Hettle

    Racist idiot Michelle. You send a troll to dailykos and that is supposed to be interesting.
    Your president is pathetic, and you aren’t any better.

  • http://www.livejournal.com/users/vicfitz82 Victor F

    I work for a daily newspaper in Mt Pleasant, Mich., which is a mostly white college town. The city empties out almost completely during the summer and fills up again to a healthy level during school. I’m a city guy, so I kind of like it when the students come back. Also, I just graduated from the school this May so most of the people I know are students.
    In July 2004, Demarcus Graham, a Flint man, was severely beaten outside a local bar/club. He was comatose and taken to hospital, where he died after 19 days. It took a grand jury more than a year to build a case and finger the assailants. Who are the people being indicted on 2nd degree murder charges? Black football players from CMU.
    Most days I work for the newspaper, a picture of a white person ends up on the front page, and mostly it’s “positive” news like county fairs or something like that. Lately, since the indictments have been coming in, pictures of black people in shackles and prison uniforms have been running on the front page. This bothers me so much, because I know it looks exactly like what you’re describing here. But all I can do is take the photos and hope the context speaks for itself, and not for any racist bias in the paper.
    …although, the paper is all-white. The community is 89% white. The university (Central Michigan University) is mostly white (sorry, can’t find numbers at this moment). It is also the middle of Michigan, which is mostly farmland. Most blacks in Michigan live near larger cities and can go to schools closer to home (and in more interesting and vibrant locales than whitebread Mt Pleasant).
    While I recognize that, at its core, the beating death of Graham was caused by poor decisions and alcohol, I know people are seeing it as “blacks are dangerous” and it bothers me every day, to know that I could be perpetuating this senseless message.

  • michel

    So stop perpetuating it. End of story. End of photo. God is asking you to do it, you already know that. Don’t come here and expect people to feel sorry for you. Do the right thing now. NOW. Then, when the consequences come, we can talk about you.

  • michel

    Yet again, I am wondering about the choices of images, how much analysis these can sustain. Talking about racism while putting the images up there that perpetuate it is, I don’t know, kind of pointless. What exactly are we trying to articulate here? That soldiering is always dangerous, even at home? That African-Americans are complex people and not able to be summed up in a sentence? OK, sure, terrific. We have just proven to ourselves that blacks are people. Wait, let me get out my blackberry; I need to write that down. We have proven that being an American soldier (or the violence that is part of the job) does not come to an end away from the battlefield. Yes, and? Am I missing something? Can we get some images that are not just reactions to reactionaries? Proactive? Creative?

  • PTate in MN

    Victor F: “I know people are seeing it as “blacks are dangerous” and it bothers me every day, to know that I could be perpetuating this senseless message.”
    I think you raise an important and difficult issue, one that echos the Bag’s comments. As humans we are rotten at remembering certain kinds of information and quick to remember other kinds of information. The moment a newspaper or Michelle Malkin prints a photo of an African American accused of a crime, people’s automatic and unconscious stereotypes are activated. We confirm our prejudices. People who are inclined to hate and fear African Americans will use it to justify their discrimination.
    But what to do? In your 89% white community a crime has been committed, and the alleged perpetrators are part of the 11% who are not white. Should we not print photos of individuals who have committed crimes because we know that some people will use those pictures to justify hate-filled attitudes?? It’s the liberal’s dilemma.

  • http://www.livejournal.com/users/vicfitz82 Victor F

    Michel- not asking for sympathy, just asking for input, really. It’s a complicated issue. As a person who frequents this website, I know very well that context can often end up on the back-burner when it comes to individuals analyzing images. Especially in a “liberal blog” context, it’s easy to read into an image something you might not see if it were in, say, the NY Times or something.
    It’s good to remind people like me, who are sometimes not the fastest to act, that what I do is more important that what I think I should be doing, so thanks for that. I know there’s a difference between “do” and “try.” Who was it who said “Do or do not–there is no ‘try?’” Was it Yoda? I realize that’s really the important thing to keep in mind here.
    But how to represent a minority group in a positive, conscious way without seeming condescending or pandering, or exploitative? Where does the issue end and the spin or fluff or whatever else you want to call it begin? As a journalist, I think it’s impossible to not have these ideas in mind as you realize you want to represent your community accurately and fairly.

  • readytoblowagasket

    Here’s something someone can do: Send the 2nd photo to Michelle Malkin and ask her to discuss it.
    Victor F: I think it’s hard to represent a minority group fairly/accurately/positively if you don’t have any direct input from members of that group. Sounds like the office needs to actively recruit a more diverse staff. Don’t know if you have any influence over that, however. Where does that 21 percent of the community get its news? Your paper? Or from a source that better represents minorities (like, say, a more urban paper)?

  • michel

    Victor–well said. I guess I am still wondering why crime is an issue. We seem predisposed to think it is an issue, the issue. I don’t think so. I think that we are sucked into thinking that. Democracy is the issue, human relations are the issue, ethics is the issue. Our fellow human beings and all they COULD BE (not just all they actually are in this alienating social grid) is the issue. If journalism means admitting that security and claims to property trump real thought, then there is no liberal journalism, no real journalism at all. So I put it to you–why is crime worth your time?

  • hauksdottir

    Oh, yes, “values”, and Bill Bennett!
    William Bennett, a good sound Christian moralizer (when he isn’t in Vegas dropping hundreds of thousands of dollars on his little habit), opened his yap a few days ago and said:
    “But I do know that it’s true that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could — if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down. That would be an impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible thing to do, but your crime rate would go down.”
    (Bill Bennett’s “Morning in America” airs on approximately 115 radio stations with an estimated weekly audience of 1.25 million listeners… so this was hardly a private conversation!!!)
    So, he is only pro-life if it is a white life. Otherwise, you might as well die now and get out of his way.
    http://mediamatters.org/items/200509280006
    http://billmon.org/archives/002211.html
    He quite obviously equates black with criminal. Crime is a lot more complicated than the color of one’s skin… social conditioning, parenting, and education all can lead to jobs and association with others who might hold more middle-class attitudes… but maybe he doesn’t think of lawyers who authorize torture (of dark-skinned people), misappropriate billions (from the Native Americans, or order the invasion and murder of entire populations (again of dark-skinned people) as criminals? Maybe he failed as a Secretary of Education because he didn’t believe in its power to lift people from poverty and helplessness… as well as to enrich their lives in a way that no number of stolen TVs or joy-ridden cars can ever do.
    Carolly

  • http://themindofmike.com Mike

    So, let me get this straight then. It’s Michelle Malkin’s fault that these guys happened to be black that assaulted the Vet? That makes perfect sense. Have you ever happened to visit HERE? LOL

  • Micheal Jackson

    YOUR ALL A BUNCH OF NIGGAZ GONNA GET SHOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • crazy gyal

    Ur just dmn racist (michael jackson) and by the way im a nigger as well

  • MARIA SEGOVIA

    WHY DO PEOPLE GOTTA BE LIKE THAT!!