BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement

September 14, 2005

The Week America Lost New Orleans: A Presidential Retrospective (#3)

Bushairmanny

Katrina Disaster — Day 3

Wednesday, August 31, 2005

As the Gulf Coast disaster spins out of control, most of us see this picture (taken by Mannie Garcia of Reuters) and conclude that the President is out of touch.

However, in light of the incompetence that follows; the time lines that will document that incompetence; and, especially, the accounts that will emerge of President Bush’s actions, access and state of mind over these days, it will become evident that this picture says more (and that other versions will say still more).

For example, Garcia’s shot reveals Bush in his “Commander In Chief” jacket with the large presidential logo on one side and his name and title stitched on the other.  Realizing he had better start looking on top of things — and with the New Orleans fly-by already arranged — isn’t his clothing the one one prop he has to work with?  As a man of gesture — in lieu of the real thing — the jacket is meant to remind that he’s somehow in charge.  (Unfortunately, the picture turns out to be so damning, nobody notices the jacket — which suggests that the only person assuaged by the attire is probably Bush himself.)

Bushatwindow1-1

The “out takes” (by which I mean, the wire photos that didn’t circulate widely because they weren’t as “fit” as Mannie’s) suggest even more, however.  Bush’s expression in this home run photo by AP’s Susan Walsh might turn out to be one of the more revealing portraits of the Bush presidency.  Sadly, it is reminiscent of the “My Pet Goat” photo taken on the morning of 9/11.  In this case, however, the “Oh my God” is replaced with a look of “What the hell do you expect me to do about it?”  Clearly, its a rare glimpse of Bush without the mask, or the script, or the teleprompter, or the Rove or Cheney, or the transmitter — and he knows it.

Bushindarkair

Of the many “out take” images, this one is also interesting — if not somewhat more associative.  (I guess it would be too easy to say it’s literally a guy in the dark.) 

What is unique about this shot is that it’s the only one that manages to depict Bush and New Orleans at the same time.  Because we can see that he sees it, this photo (more than the others) serves as a visual indictment of Bush’s absence from a situation he is clearly responsible for. 

Just as powerfully, however, what the image also represents is the extent to which Bush remains encapsulated in his own confined world.  The image reinforces the understanding that Bush remains walled off at all times, with only the most distant and fragmentary perception of what is going on outside.

Finally, I cannot emphasized enough how absolutely staged these images are.

Of course, that might seem obvious upon making the statement — especially if you share my politics.  Because of the assuming nature of a photo, however (with its suggestion of reality and its emotional draw), it is always going to pull for acceptance of the spin. 

On the other hand, it is much harder to take the President’s posturing at face value when you can see evidence of the stage and the actor, one pose after another.  At that point, you can see that this is simply a photo shoot, and the President, rather than being somebody at this critical moment, is trying to look like someone instead.

(By the way, my last “contact strip” below shows Bush’s actual view of the Superdome — three and a half days before it will ultimately be evacuated.)

Strip1-3

Strip4-6

Strip7-9

Strip11-12

Stripsuperdome

(The other entries in this series are available here.)

(image 1: REUTERS/Mannie Garcia. Air Force One of New Orleans. August 31, 2005. At YahooNews.  image 2: AP/Susan Walsh. Air Force One of New Orleans. August 31, 2005. At YahooNews.  image 3: AP/Susan Walsh. Air Force One of New Orleans. August 31, 2005. At YahooNews.  filmstrip 1-5 (all August 31, 2005.  All from YahooNews):  1. (Mannie Garcia/Reuters) 2. (AFP/File/Jim Watson) 3. (Mannie Garcia/Reuters) 4. (AFP/Jim Watson) 5.  (AP Photo/Susan Walsh/ Canadian Press) 6.  (AFP/Jim Watson) 7. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh) 8. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh) 9. REUTERS/Mannie Garcia 10.  (AP Photo/Susan Walsh) 11.  (AP Photo/Susan Walsh) 12. & 14. The Superdome (AFP/Jim Watson)13. The Superdome. (Mannie Garcia/Reuters).)

  • eva

    Thank you for reminding us that this is a staged photo shoot, the fly-over a White House photo op. Seeing the second photo in particular, which ran with a news story in the first week of Katrina, I had the impression Bush was caught in an unguarded moment, maybe even having an epiphany. It becomes inreasingly clear that none of his moments is “unguarded”, all are totally staged.

  • tc

    Can you talk at all about the body language of his hands? He often looks as if he doesn’t know what to do with them, as if they are awkward appendages over which he has no control.

  • lemondloulou54

    You are right on the money with this. Everyone seems to have forgotten that Bush flew over NO and the Gulf States on Wednesday and “saw” the destruction with his own eyes. Yet it didn’t sink in to his thick skull or, apparently, to anyone else on AF1. Wasn’t everybody on that plane overwhelmed by what they saw? Wasn’t the purpose of the fligh over to assess damage? Was it just to take a photo?
    Aren’t the photographers and the rest of the press on AF1 complicit in the lack of response? I mean, how can anybody see this stuff and not start talking immediately to the president about what he is seeing? Is everybody around this guy a robot?
    I am consistently overwhelmed by this man’s inability to respond on a visceral level to anything.

  • Phredd

    “It’s devastating. It’s got to be doubly devastating on the ground.” – George W. Bush, August 31, 2005

  • eva

    Are we to be moved by the fact that Bush indicated he was moved? Anyone could see that Katrina was devastating. Swift and decisive action, decision-making is what we expect of a leader, not a staged show of emotion for the nightly news three days after the devastation.

  • Gary

    I assure you I noticed the jacket almost immediately and asked myself, does the President usually travel inside the airplane in that stupid jacket? How phoney is that?!

  • http://www.sherrychandler.com Bluegrass Poet

    tc — I’m with you on the hands and arms, it’s what gives him that apelike stance. Here, what’s with the fists??
    Gary — the jacket, are we supposed to associate this with some kind of working man, a lineman say or an auto mechanic? Or is it military?
    Those guys who did the Bush action figure had it right after all — dress up the little president doll.

  • http://www.lananfrank.net/lana/ amanuensis

    He looks like a child that just got in trouble. The jacket actually adds to that effect by looking like a school boy zipper jacket; rather than an adult suit jacket. That he is hunching down to look through the windows just adds to the “am I in trouble?” look he gives the camera.
    You would expect an adult, who is in charge and taking responsiblity, to be pacing and leaning to look out the window. You wouldn’t expect him to be hunched down in the dark and squished into a chair, like a child.
    The Air Force 1 pictures from Sept. 11 are not exactly impressive either, but are at least showing Bush is alive and active,( http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/september11/ ), not cowering in fear.

  • bg

    Did anyone else see a quote attributed to Trent Lott after Bush visited his destroyed house and talked about sitting on the porch of Lott’s new home after rebuilding? I think Lott said something like, “That was the Presidency, not the President talking.”
    I think that “framing” of the Presidency vs: the President is exactly what we see here. It is not the President but the “Presidency” that is on view at all times.
    Like yesterday, Bush taking “responsibility.” HE is not taking responsibility, it is “the Presidency” doing another stand-in for him.

  • Andrew L.

    My eyes are continually drawn to his hands — the fists clenched, almost white-knuckled. Here is a guy who is full of inner turmoil at this moment. He isn’t overcome with empathy and emotion — it is something else. My guess is that it some type of fear and terror — he has no idea how he can fix this and it is tearing him up. He doesn’t know how to be “Presidential” in this crisis.

  • sanitas

    I’d imagine the airspace was closed during this fly-by photo op. When you have a 747 buzzing N.O. at 1700 feet you’d better get those rescue choppers out of the farkin’ way.

  • pragmatic_realist

    One other unique factor in this situation is that he was caught without any of his staff around to manage the situation for him. Cheyney, Rove, Card were all away on vacation. His chief communication person is in Europe getting married, and other staff are there with her. He is caught having to manage this with just a junior aide.
    And it is his own doing. This vacation deal is his own way of sticking it to the country full of people who are working overtime to get their jobs done, taking fewer vacation days, and, for people working part-time, no vacation at all.
    What kind of place is it where ALL the bosses are allowed to take vacation at the same time? Who is running the country?
    His staying on vacation two extra days AFTER the hurricane hit was just a poke in the eye to those who expected him to do something. Like the sullen kid who has to be dragged out in the morning to cut the lawn, he is determined to take his time.

  • E-mart

    I keep noticing that of all the window shades, only the one at Bush’s seat is not fully open. It gives the impression that Bush had just raised it, as though he had kept it closed, blocking out the view, until the time came for photographs to be taken.

  • http://LAVoice.org mack reed

    He’s looked, acted and sounded – throughout – like a frat boy brought before the dean. His “apology” yesterday felt like a scripted mea culpa, and if he thinks about this at all on human terms beyond the obvious political pickle into which it’s flung him, it’s probably more along the lines expressed by his sainted mother: “They were underprivileged anyway.”

  • mr

    I read somewhere that Rove actually invited the reporters in to that part of the plane (from which they are ordinarily excluded) to take the photo and has been roundly criticized for having done so and that in general Repugs are horrified by the photo. Is that wrong, was Rove not there???

  • MonsieurGonzo

    To the extent that the federal government didn’t fully do its job right, I take responsibility,” Bush told a White House news conference at which he openly questioned U.S. preparedness.
    The President has done the obvious, only after it was clear he could not get away with the inexcusable.” -John Kerry

  • http://www.neilcavanagh.com Neil

    The first pic is my favorite. The intentionally clenched fist as if to say “I’m so angry about what’s happened to my people!” The angry father photo-op.
    Meanwhile if he were to lift that right hand up, and keep his left hand where it is, it becomes an offensive gesture towards anyone who might criticize him.

  • DrBB

    The look (picture 2): “Shit this is a big fuck-up. How do I get out of this one?”
    The fists: Anger. Not at the devastation but his own predicament. Looking for someone to hit. “Somebody’s gonna pay for this fuckup and it isn’t gonna be me.”
    The jacket: The boy preznit in his Big Airplane. The quintessential truth about Bush pere et fils: All suit; no man.

  • http://demiorator.blogspot.com/ Wordlackey

    The photos of each of Bush’s visits (and flybys) of the area are so staged I have trouble associating any actual action with them. The plane photos seemed completely designed for captioning rather than gathering info. “Bush surveys damage.”
    I heard that the firemen walking next to Bush on his first on the ground visit were specifically taken away from a preliminary staging area in Atlanta(?). They had actually not done any rescue work at all yet. Their first task in the disaster area was to pose with Bush.
    This is the PR vision of crisis management: sanitized images, concerned sound bites, and control of information. The difference this time is that the disparity between the reality on the ground and the image is beyond easy manipulations.

  • Parallel Universe

    Guess the GOP won’t be selling these to raise campaign dough, like they did with the 9/11 flyover pics . . .

  • lytom

    Considering the reality now, it is outrageous that seeing the destruction, he could only see the profit in a plan to proportion the recovery to his cronies’ corporations, who already reap billions of dollars in Iraq.
    There is no transparency on the awarding of money to corporations to clean up LO … The hyenas are ready to get more dough from the victims’ misfortune!

  • http://profile.typekey.com/aog/ Annoying Old Guy

    As the Gulf Coast disaster spins out of control

    – TheBAG

    The Port of New Orleans began unloading its first cargo ship since Hurricane Katrina on Tuesday night, months sooner than was predicted, a sign that disruption to the nation’s shipping capacity may be less severe than originally forecast.

    – The Washington Post

    Are these two talking about the same event?
    One might want to keep in mind that, once President Bush has been tagged with sole responsibility (as this website does), he’ll naturally pick up sole credit should things turn out better (such as, say, a lower than expected number of deaths).

  • Jeff Caldwell

    I take a back seat to no one in my deep disgust at this Administration’s ineptitude and venality, but what exactly is he supposed to look like in these photos? Are they really that damning? I think we’re wasting a lot of time reading the language of his hands–there’s plenty of bad news in his actions that we need to deal with.

  • bg

    OldGuy–after the right wing has already blamed the victims who “chose to stay” how can Bush take credit for people who did not drown?

  • Lt. Bighorn

    Wrong, AOG.
    Nothing will erase the fact that Dubya chose to remain on vacation for days while the disaster was looming, while the disaster struck, and while thousands suffered in its aftermath.
    If the death toll is less than expected, we will thank God, but not the guitar-strumming cowboy.

  • Lt. Bighorn

    I take a back seat to no one in my deep disgust at this Administration’s ineptitude and venality, but what exactly is he supposed to look like in these photos? Are they really that damning? I think we’re wasting a lot of time reading the language of his hands–there’s plenty of bad news in his actions that we need to deal with.
    You’re right. I have yet to see a picture of Dubya in which he doesn’t look clueless and out of his depth, but maybe that’s just me… or maybe it’s because he is singularly unqualified for the position that was thrust upon him.
    As bad as Katrina was, the worst disaster to hit the United States in recent years was the coup that put this incompetent, arrogant, and venal man in the White House. More unnecessary death and destruction resulted from that one event than from any other.

  • http://phoenixwoman.blogspot.com MEC

    I think those clenched fists indicate how close Dubya is to completely, as they say in the psych biz, decompensating. It’s not anger or frustration — it’s a tight grasp on the shreds of his self-control.

  • The BAG

    AOG,

    The three post I have done so far in my Week America Lost New Orleans/ Presidential Retrospective series are all date, and (at least loosely) written as if composed on that particular day. As far as I understand, the Gulf Coast disaster was spinning out of control on Wednesday, August 31, 2005. Sorry if this wasn’t clear.

  • gordo

    I think that the secret of Bush’s ability to build a personality cult is that he has the instincts of a male model. Quite literally, his brand of leadership has been about image and style over substance and reality.
    Like all models, he depends on talented professionals to set the shots up (Mt. Rushmore, Mission Accomplished), and keen-eyed editors to select the best shots. The White House has also developed a top-notch wardrobe department that can provide him with unique costumes.
    Bush’s advance team knows that if they give him the right costume and set up the picture correctly, Bush can give them the perfect steely gaze or optimistic cast. The photo editors of the newspapers will naturally select the most compelling shots.
    Here, the photo editors betrayed him. Bush appears to be trying for a combination of heartfelt sympathy and a determination to make things right, and there were probably dozens of discarded photos that would have conveyed exactly that. In the wake of Katrina, though, the Fourth Estate was in no mood to play along, and the photo selected aptly reflects the tenor of the coverage. For the first time in my memory, the mainstream media’s preferred image of the President is one in which he seems to be caught off-guard, helpless, and frightened.

  • http://www.geocities.com/vodyanoi Half Canadian

    Whew, after all of this “expert psycho analysis”, when will you guys get off your butts and use your powers to solve all of those unsolved crimes?

  • MonsieurGonzo

    Ground Control to Major Tom
    insofar as propaganda goes, this “great leader at the window of his aircraft” thing has lost its juice; eg., it seems like only yesterday that the BAGman was doing the same thing with CA Governor Schwarzenegger and his “leader looks out the window” mudslide moment…
    …then there is perhaps the original prototype for this whole genre, Leni Riefenstahl’s great film, Triumph of the Will : magnificently edited images show the leader’s aircraft descending as if from heaven; its shadow = the leader’s will literally herding and organizing the chaotic masses milling about in the streets below to become orderly columns of singular purpose.
    but the 50+ year-old “stock shot” from which this Bush image is derived has gotta be Hitler at the window of his Fokker tri-plane window, looking out over the destroyed city of Warsaw / Eastern Front / Paris (pick one) and here it is, kids.

  • neologic

    “Bush’s absence from a situation he is clearly responsible for.” He did not cause the hurricane or the flood, and there is nothing he could have done to prevent it. The federal response was botched for sure, but the view out of the plane would have been the same no matter who was president. Who could think otherwise and be ‘reality based’ ?
    I dislike the man and his plan too, but this thread is absurd, and its the kind of thing that hurts the left as creationism hurts the right.
    Looking at his face here, you could read anything you want into it. Actually, instead of projecting your fantasies about his self doubt and fear, many people would actually see this as humanizing Bush- he looks like anyone would look when faced with that kind of wreak.

  • http://profile.typekey.com/aog/ Annoying Old Guy

    TheBAG;
    Ah, my mistake. I would agree that it seemed that way back then.
    gordo;
    I think Bush has been able to build his personality cult primarily because his opponents react to almost every event with a great thrashing hysteria. When it turns out later that the Patriot Act didn’t turn American in to a fascist police state, or the brutal Afghan winter didn’t destroy our military forces, or Baghdad wasn’t Stalingrad on the Euphrates, or the hurricane Katrina aftermath didn’t spiral out of control, Bush looks like a calm, collected leader by comparison. I want to extend my thanks to all of you for doing your part in this. I doubt Bush would have made it this far without people like you helping him along.

  • George Myers

    Look uo in the air. Is that the plane President Reagan authorized bt never flew in to replace the one Jackie Jeenedy decorated? What’s that down below? Is that Molly Marine, “A statue of a Woman Marine located in New Orleans, LA. The first statue of a woman in military service in the United States.”? Is she still there? (From: “An Unofficial Dictionary for Marines containing words, phrases and acronyms used by United States Marines through the ages”) Look up in the air! It’s a lie, a murder, an abortion! (From: Professor Hogan, undergrad. “Planetary Atmospheres” professor)

  • Mad

    It is fascinating that different people can look at a person and a photo and see such different qualities in the person. Here in this thread we have people who don’t like Bush or BushPlan, and yet do not see anything wrong with the the expression on Bush’s face or with his posture, or with his posturing.
    Millions of conservatives still love Bush. They see Dubya as a Great Leader.
    I am both dumbfounded and confused by this. The man that I see in the second photo above displays no leadership qualities whatsoever. He looks devious, he looks like he is in trouble, and he looks lost.

  • geri

    Who else in Washington has their name stitched on their jacket? I see a man posed for a scene…. he does not need to understand what he sees before him. He is logo.. a name on his clothes, because he is a photo op, an image and sales.
    It is beyond sad that our constitution has distilled with age to this.

  • David W.

    I am reminded of another photograph, taken on 9/11/2001 of Air Force One flying high over the fields of Iowa along with two Air Force fighter jets. Just lonely white contrails streaking across the sky and fading away, with a leader who was distant as well.

  • Martin

    I can’t understand the decision to wear the stupid jacket. Surely Bush must know that the most reassuring “costume” for such a situation is the classic suit and tie?

  • Moquiti

    I perceive the fists more as frustration. Not knowing what to do. Knowing that he must do SOMETHING! “I TOLD them to evacuate those people!” [if they had just listened to me, none of this would be have happened] Most critically, knowing this: this is as bad as 9/11, or worse, because he can’t just strut up onto a platform, look presidential, and declare: “Let’s go shopping!”

  • fotonique

    The BAG said:

    …the picture turns out to be so damning…
    …wire photos that didn’t circulate widely because they weren’t as “fit” as Mannie’s…
    Finally, I cannot emphasize enough how absolutely staged these images are.
    Because of the assuming nature of a photo, however (with its suggestion of reality and its emotional draw), it is always going to pull for acceptance of the spin.
    …it is much harder to take the President’s posturing at face value when you can see evidence of the stage and the actor, one pose after another. At that point, you can see that this is simply a photo shoot…

    Posers & Propagandistas?
    Mannie Garcia, Reuters
    Jim Watson, Agence France Press
    Susan Walsh, President, White House News Photographers’ Association (founded 1921*):

    WHNPA Bylaws (PDF)
    ARTICLE III (Code of Ethics)
    The White House News Photographers’ Association, a professional organization dedicated to the support of photojournalism and to ensure the rights of its members in the performance of their duties, strongly believes in the public’s natural and legal right to freedom in searching for the truth and the right to be accurately and completely informed about the world in which we live. We believe that there is a direct linkage between the survival of a Democratic Society and an accurate and free Press. To that end, we believe that the public journal (both print and television) is a public trust and that all connected with it are to the full measure of their responsibility, trustees for the public. We believe that motion and still pictures are an indispensable means of informing people about their world. We strongly urge and expect our members to maintain the highest standards of ethical conduct in serving the public interest. To that end, all WHNPA members must aspire to the following code of ethics:
    1. A healthy Democracy depends on a free and accurate press.
    2. The public journal is a public trust and those who work in it are trustees for the public.
    3. The practice of Photojournalism (Both TV and Stills) is worthy of the highest dedication and professionalism of those who enter into it as a life’s work.
    4. Truthfulness, Accuracy, and Fairness are fundamental to good Photojournalism. To publish distortions of the truth is indefensible.
    5. [missing text: Photojournalists and Journalists should publish images and words only of what he or she holds in his or] her heart to be true.
    6. Our images and words shall be objective and published for the public good. We shall be stoutly independent of power and of material or monetary influence.
    7. It is our duty to encourage, assist, and educate all members of our profession, and those who aspire to it, so that the quality of photojournalism may always be raised to higher standards.
    8. In the pursuit of our profession, we shall always be mindful of our duty to the common good of society, sensitive to matters of privacy and the grief of others, and to discharge that duty so that when our work is done, we shall have endeavored to lift the level of human ideals and achievement higher than we found it.

    *U.S. Presidents Since 1921.

  • http://www.loveliberty2004.com Liberty

    I’m not sure how anyone could look at that photo of him and feel reassured, comforted, or as though they know he’s handling the crisis. I remember by about day three, I was sobbing my eyes out at the plight of the people down there. His apologies, his lack of, these photos, hugging those victims, his driving through the rubble… ALL of it is utterly scripted. Not once have I seen him show genuine emotion or sympathy.
    Daily, he finds new ways to make me sick…

  • Kip W

    “Hey, I can see Trent Lott’s house from here!”

  • http://crazydaisy.us Kerstin

    Kip W ~ Great, now you’ve got me worried ’bout bladder control. Good one.
    Arrogant Obstinate Geezer! Oh, how you break my liberal heart.
    “Bush looks like a calm, collected leader by comparison. I want to extend my thanks to all of you for doing your part in this. I doubt Bush would have made it this far without people like you helping him along.”
    Can it be that good old-fashioned conservative intellectual rigor is truly dead? Say it ain’t so! But, alas, it appears to be true. Even you, oh paternalistic one, have been reduced to playing The Blame Game.
    Well, if you’re gonna play that game, let’s blame Poppa Bush, eh? After all, if it weren’t for all the paternal bail-outs, this cowboy would still be passed out … on Trent Lott’s front porch.

  • http://mediaintrouble.blogspot.com media in trouble

    Perhaps someone has brought this up already.
    However, It is rather difficult to take a picture of the third nature without changing lenses or filters to accomodate for the difference in light. I am no photographer but I remember trying to take pictures like these on an airliner and let’s just say you need to mess with apertures and such.
    Perhaps a professional photographer can make more comments on the technical aspect which deems these photos to be as you suggested, staged.

  • http://profile.typekey.com/aog/ Annoying Old Guy

    Kerstin;
    I’m not blaming anyone, I was simply expounding an alternate theory with regard to gordo’s post. I would think that my theory, which portrays Bush as a rather weak candidate in absolute terms, would be more acceptable here than one that requires him to be clever and capable.
    m.i.t;
    You are quite correct. It’s something I frequently have problems with. Basically, any picture on the airplane in which you can see outside (e.g., New Orleans) is going to strongly underexpose the inside (i.e., put Bush in the dark).

  • carol

    It’s really simple: Bush was posturing in the “fly over” because he doesn’t experience real emotions or have any depth. That explains his stupid scowls, deer in the headlight look, and inappropriate comments (Looking forward to Lott’s new porch) and inability to say or do anything that isn’t rehearsed and created by more clever people. He tries to ACT like he THINKS real presidents would act in any given situation and comes off appearing phony and weird. It’s always, always about him. I turned off the sound during his speech tonight and just observed his expressions and mannerisms. What a loser. The international mystery is how anyone is fooled by this dimwit.

  • carol

    It’s really simple: Bush was posturing in the “fly over” because he doesn’t experience real emotions or have any depth. That explains his stupid scowls, deer in the headlight look, and inappropriate comments (Looking forward to Lott’s new porch) and inability to say or do anything that isn’t rehearsed and created by more clever people. He tries to ACT like he THINKS real presidents would act in any given situation and comes off appearing phony and weird. It’s always, always about him. I turned off the sound during his speech tonight and just observed his expressions and mannerisms. What a loser. The international mystery is how anyone is fooled by this dimwit.

  • http://profile.typekey.com/sjones/ Steve Jones

    Look, I know all about Godwin’s Law and all, but God Damn! Photo 2 bears an awful resemblance to the photo at the upper right of this page.

  • http://profile.typekey.com/sjones/ Steve Jones

    Oh, never mind.

  • http://crazydaisy.us Kerstin

    Carol ~ It’s not really a mystery how people are fooled by Dimwit. They see themselves in him. They relate to his dimwitedness. Perhaps the mystery is how we became a nation of dimwits.
    AOG ~ Gotchya. You know, I think Bush is clever. His use of charm is very clever, so clever a lot of people have a hard time seeing beyond it. But clever like a fox? No. He’s not capable, but certainly the people managing his persona know what they are doing.

  • gleex

    After the prop CIC blue jacket I think the most important/obvious object is his watch that he is turning (or being directed to turn) so its face catches the light for the photographer. There is a lot one could say about why his watch would be featured so prominently (or why he is positioned in what looks like a contrived pose). The watch draws the eyes to his tangle of arms and fists (mismanaged time and might) and away from his face and eyes (lack of vision and empathy – but if done right I am sure he could achieve that look for the photo – perhaps hands-on rather than vision was in mind…but from a plane taking the imperial look, hard to be hands-on from there). Unfortunate “time” to be so tangled up, I wonder if he has a greater need to have his watch on the ready after such a long vacation. Having never had such a long vacation I am not sure how long it takes to snap out of it, never mind if a person is running the country and the entire team is off buying $2,000 shoes or $2.9M waterfront property while New Orleans sinks and its people drown. I mean who is going to take a leadership role at writing speeches that make the POTUS -sound like- a leader, or who is going to set up that perfect photo so the POTUS -looks like- a leader?
    Perhaps he is setting his watch to a new timetable. Perhaps he is realizing that he wasted away in Crawfordville, or at his guitar strumming photo op – and now he has lost time on this photo op. Perhaps he just thinks the watch looks really cool with his CIC jacket/costume.
    I think the most important theme is light (and dark). I think they got it backward though. It should be dark outside the window, and the light should be coming from the busy activity and problem solving that should be going on. There is just a bit of light that falls on his face, but as we know the reality of what he was seeing did not sink in.
    Sadly for the victims the obvious message one takes from this picture (and especially seeing the series of pictures) is that it’s just a photo op. The message is supported by the fact that even after this “fly by” he still did not get it and needed a DVD of TV news shows the following day to figure out human being were suffering and dying. We also know from the aftermath that fixing the politics was more important than fixing the problem (for example the front page of the NY Times had an article on Rove’s plan to stonewall and implicate the locals…all that talent to plan and coordinate – what a sin that it did not go into helping people).
    One can only hope these are the last pictures from the last moment of the anti-reality crowd.
    Sorry if I have confused themes, elements, etc. I am unsure of the accurate terminology.

  • fotonique

    Applicable Photo Techniques:
    Using Window Light
    Exposure Compensation
    Spot Metering
    Exposure Bracketing
    Fill Flash (not used here)
    Any professional will be familiar with these methods.

  • babydeebie

    Loved your post, gleex.
    Bush has mismanaged time. He also loves to look down, as Zeus, upon the lowly humans.

  • DanM

    Maybe the clenched fists are indicative of his internal defensive efforts against feelings of empathy and regret trying to break into his consciousness. Perhaps his anxious look is a reflection of these frightening, unfamiliar, unwanted, shadowy feelings stirring on the periphery of his awareness.

  • DanM

    As an afterthought – seeing the scenes of devastation might have stirred up old memories in Bush of times when he himself felt powerless, abandoned, and wretched. The clenched fists represent his defensive struggle to keep these memories and the associated feelings repressed.

  • http://molly.douthett.net Molly

    I think you’re on to it DanM. Except those memories are not buried; they are simmering just below the surface and could blow at any time. He is dangerous.

  • http://profile.typekey.com/aog/ Annoying Old Guy

    fotonique;
    I looked through your links. They demonstrate quite clearly that fill flash is the only technique that would get both the outside scenery and Bush properly exposed. Given the nature of the other pictures, it looks to me like flash photography was not allowed, which wouldn’t be surprising.

  • johnathan mccauley

    can you tell me how many times president bush surveyed damage from ground level since the two hurricanes devastated the coast of louisiana vs. the coast of texas and other states affected by the two storms.
    thank you.
    j.m.

  • lcatlow

    i watched the coverage that day of the ‘flyover’ and it was Fox News who reported Bush was in the air.
    then i waited and surfed all my news coverage to hear and see more.
    no additional reports came from Fox or from any other networks.
    then within later in day there was footage of Bush back in Washington.
    it was a day or more later before photos began to appear everywhere.
    i a had strong feeling that it was possible that he was not even on the plane. the sequence from the time Fox mentioned his flyover to his arrival in DC where he transfered from US ONE to a helicopter just doesn’t fit.
    i propose that these photos were another poor attempt to mislead Americans. this president is a disgrace and exhibits total lack of integrity.
    i like many Americans feel helpless and still can’t believe he was elected under pecular circumstance again.