BagNews Archives About Staff BagNews is a progressive site dedicated to visual politics and the analysis of news images.
Friday, February 10, 2012

Twitter

@bagnewsnotes »
Advertisement



January 15, 2005

Harry The Nazi

 Us.Yimg.Com P Ap 20050113 Capt.Lab10101130053.Britain Royals Prince Harry Lab101

  Certainly, Prince Harry showing up at a costume party wearing a Nazi uniform is going to stir debate about his values; Prince Charles’ parenting style; and the extent to which youth in Britain and the rest of the world are familiar with or understand WWII and the Holocaust.  At least, that summarizes the coverage I’ve read.

I’m not sure how much that accounts for this picture, however. 

This AP photo, which appeared on the cover of today’s LA Times, shows a man holding a newspaper with a large headline reading “Harry The Nazi” accompanying a substantial photo of Prince Harry wearing a Nazi uniform.  By the way, the man (holding the paper?  reading it?  posing with it?) is a newspaper vendor.  The newspaper, let’s just say, is not the London Times. 

But, what is the actual subject of this image?  Is it about the content of the original photo (Harry at the party, and what he’s wearing), or is it about the newspaper exhibiting Harry’s picture (Harry getting caught, and being put on display to the benefit of the gossip industry), or is it about the motive of the news seller (one Roy Ottoway)– who may be standing behind Harry and the paper, but stands to gain not just from the newspaper’s depiction of Harry, but from the AP’s depiction of him.  (In considering the objects, notice the newspaper is the largest element, with Mr. Ottoway a close second, and Harry third.)

By the way, there is one more level of display.  You, the information consumer, would hardly see an image like this in isolation.  Instead, you would see it in another newspaper, or on a news website.  In that case, it’s worth mentioning that Harry is not just entertainment fodder for the gossip rags, but is also a revenue source for the AP, the LA Times and Yahoo, as well.

Maybe this photo is about Hitler, Britain and the Holocaust.  Maybe this shot is about history and about how today’s youth fail to understand it.  Maybe the photo embodies the more symptomatic nature of an intensely rich, intensely famous and intensely scrutinized kid who might understandably be a little confused and pissed off (and might have taken the family’s impending outpouring of attention over the 60th anniversary of the Auschwitz liberation as an opportunity to stage a little rebellion). 

On the other hand, maybe this shot is about the fate of a not-quite-fairy tale prince who’s mother’s life, marriage and death served as one of the largest, most profitable gossip troughs of the last half century.

(image: AP/Adam Butler in YahooNews)

  • woodswitch

    Or maybe the photo has been doctored to embarrass the royal family and either it isn’t really Harry or he isn’t really wearing a Nazi armband. Who publishes The Sun anyway?

  • Michael Daniels

    The man is looking inside the paper though. I seem to remember some pretty interesting pictures on page 3 of certain British papers…

  • http://blog.thought-mesh.net Annoying Old Guy

    It’s all a bit much. First off, it’s amazing how incensed people get over a costume at a party. It’s just a costume! People dress up as axe-murderers and no one cares or thinks they’re advocating axe-murdering.

    And of course, the chattering classes seem far more upset about a stupid costume than actual mass murder of jews. Synagogues get fire bombed and it’s well, it’s just disaffected youth.

    But if we’re going to go by historical evil, wouldn’t it be worse to wear the insignia of just as brutal a regime that killed tens of millions of people, far more than the Nazis? Not to mention massive ethnic cleansing operations. But the Red Star is considered a chic fashion statement. Dress up as Lavrentii Beria and who’d care? It’s obvious that it’s not about Nazis but something else.

  • http://blog.thought-mesh.net Annoying Old Guy

    P.S. Michael, if you’re nostalgic for that kind of reporting, try The Sun’s Page 3 on the Internet. Warning: Not a worksafe link.

  • KZ

    I think this is the LA Times’ way of showing the photo without taking responsibility for it. “Look what the Sun has on its cover!”
    It’s like the way the mainstream US media wait for the National Enquirer to go first with a sex scandal, so that they can report “the National Enquirer printed a story …” rather than taking responsibility for running it first themselves.

  • jr

    If anyone wishes to attend a costume party dressed in Nazi garb, they would be naive to think that it wouldn’t affect people in the least. I personally don’t appreciate serial killer costumes on Halloween, but I don’t believe that Jack the Ripper or Ted Bundy carries the same connotation as Adolf Hitler or Facism in general. Yet people are free to exercise whatever bad judgement they may wish; in Harry’s case however, the party itself was a ‘Colonials and Natives’ soiree, which harbors its own dubious legitmacy, and though it was not a public event, he is a source of seemingly endless public scrutiny. It’s difficult to believe that anyone would find the symbols of that depraved regime suitable as a lark. Despite the fact the Swastika is an ancient Vedic symbol of good fortune, it is clearly more commonly associated with the Weimar Republic and Nazi Germany. Harry would do well to familiarize himself with his own family history regarding that period; it was his great uncle, the Duke of Windsor, who tried unsuccessfully to reinvigorate the Germanic bonds of his family, through his admiration of the emerging power of Hitler; a great deal of Britons and Europeans haven’t forgotten that, and neither should the young Prince, particularly since he seems incapable of generating anything but bad press.

  • Michael Shaw

    Michael, AOG,

    At first, I thought the “page 3″ reference was a joke! Shows how sheltered I am!

  • jr

    Michael S;
    Let the sun shine….let the sun shine in, the sun shine in………

  • http://evilqueen.demesnes.net/ Aine

    My thought, after reading the last paragraph, was:
    On the other hand, maybe it’s Prince Harry’s commentary on the way he sees things in the world of politics going. He recognizes Fascism when he sees it, and this is his way of letting us all know that he’s not going to hide what he knows, no matter how embarrassing it might be to his family. Bush and Co. may never utter the word “fascism” but Harry isn’t going to let them get away with that.
    PS – When did you stop linking to me (and why)? My blog has also moved to a new URL. ;)

  • Michael Shaw

    Aine, I’m not sure I would give Harry that much credit. BTW, I don’t know what happened with the link. I just updated it.

  • http://profile.typekey.com/RashadSalim/ Rashad

    Know its way late adding a comment to this but its just cought my eye. The point is that this story ran for a solid week on mainstream (BBC) as well as tabloid press. It effectively covered up the news broken by the head of the British Museum about the destruction of the ancient site of Babylon which ran for one evening. Untill now people remember Harry’s armband, very very few the loss of a world heritage.

  • timi

    what ever its just a costume leave the guy alone so what Jews need to get over the nazi suff for godsake its hsitory ………..MOVE ON